Article navigation

In the first paper of the second part of this themed issue on sustainable adaptation (see Darch, 2017), we continue our journey on railways, moving from a framework for the network to the specific issue of bridge scour. Scour is the primary cause of bridge failure in the UK and worldwide, and damage or loss of these integral structures has obvious safety risks as well as the potential for long-term disruption. Dikanski et al. (2017) develop a model that links climate change to bridge scour risk, using a series of data analysis and modelling steps. Risks increase in future but scour models are currently only used for the prioritisation of vulnerable sites. This is an essential early step, but as the authors note, the assessment of absolute risk will ultimately be required to support adaptation.

Dikanski et al. also identify a number of barriers to sustainable adaptation, including the inability to rely on historical weather events to estimate probabilities, use of historically-informed standards, and data quality issues. As noted, these issues have much wider applicability, along with others beyond the technical assessment of risk, including economic assessment and social preferences.

Another critical infrastructure is buildings. Low- and zero-carbon dioxide buildings have received significant attention, but it is equally important that new and existing buildings can cope with future weather. Flooding events have highlighted the vulnerability of buildings, streets and even whole districts to climate change. Buildings are also susceptible to overheating and designers must balance adaptation and mitigation needs in producing comfortable, efficient and affordable spaces.

Kinnane et al. (2017) focus on housing design and provide a detailed case study of a real, occupied, low-carbon dioxide adaptable home. The paper illustrates the future challenges associated with overheating, and different techniques for reducing this. It is clear that the way we use our homes, and preferences regarding thermal comfort, will have significant effects on building performance. Kinnane et al. conclude with an important point that we need to design for adaptability, allowing buildings to respond to both a changing climate and changing occupant needs.

In the final paper of this themed issue, we journey overseas, where adaptation is often intertwined with development, both of infrastructure and adaptive capacity. Community-based adaptation (e.g. see Ensor et al. (2014)) has emerged as an approach to adaptation in which communities are at the centre of understanding climate change impacts and drive the adaptation process.

Mulligan et al. (2017) consider responses to flooding in Kibera, the largest informal settlement in Nairobi, Kenya. As population and urbanisation increase, informal settlements are rapidly growing; home to millions of urban poor they are typically located in vulnerable areas such as river floodplains. Mulligan et al. use surveys of almost a thousand households to assess vulnerability and adaptation. They consider the meaning of sustainable adaptation in the local context, adding two extra dimensions to conventional approaches suggested by Brown (2011): that measures should reduce poverty and/or vulnerability; that actions are sustainable in the long-term and do not undermine resilience. Insecure tenure was found to disincentivise household adaptation, whilst public-policy approaches are constrained by lack of effective community engagement. Mulligan et al. put forward a case for community-responsive adaptation that combines autonomous and local physical measures with market-based adaptation such as savings and loan groups, the latter being a rare example of a current sustainable measure.

The set of papers in this themed issue has illustrated critical components of the sustainable adaptation journey, including new science, innovative modelling approaches, better governance and integrated planning. However, to use an analogy from physics, there is a lot of ‘potential energy’ that needs to be converted into the ‘kinetic energy’ of action; let’s make the next themed issue on sustainable adaptation about delivery.

Graphic. Refer to the image caption for details.

Brown
 
K
 
2011
 
Sustainable adaptation: an oxymoron?
 
Climate and Development
 
3
 
1
 
21
 -
31
Darch
 
G
 
2017
 
Editorial
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability
 
170
 
4
 
185
 -
186
 
Dikanski
 
H
,
Hagen-Zanker
 
A
,
Imam
 
B
,
Avery
 
K
 
2017
 
Climate change impacts on railway structures: bridge scour
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability
 
170
 
5
 
237
 -
248
 
Ensor
 
J
,
Berger
 
R
,
Huq
 
S
 
2014
 
Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change: Emerging Lessons
 
Practical Action Publishing
 
Rugby, UK
Kinnane
 
O
,
Grey
 
T
,
Dyer
 
M
 
2017
 
Adaptable housing design for climate change adaptation
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability
 
170
 
5
 
249
 -
267
 
Mulligan
 
J
,
Harper
 
J
,
Kipkemboi
 
P
,
Ngobi
 
B
,
Collins
 
A
 
2017
 
Community-responsive adaptation to flooding in Kibera, Kenya
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability
 
170
 
5
 
268
 -
280
 

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options