Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

The purpose of this note is two‐fold. One is to pay a belated tribute to an old teacher of mine, Allyn Young. The other is a perhaps overly ambitious attempt to supplement the excellent review of growth theory of 1964, by arguing that there is a direct line between neo‐classical growth theory as Young left it in 1928 and present day theorising; a link, I fear, that is not generally recognised. What originality it may possess lies in expanding upon the implications of Young's argument. But in such a wide and important field as growth, a somewhat different synthesis of existing but scattered ideas seems worth attempting.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal