Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study empirically examines the impact of financial institutions (mutual funds, pension funds, banks and insurance firms) on the ecological footprint of six developed economies.

Design/methodology/approach

Using data from 2001 to 2020, we employed robust econometric techniques, including CS-ARDL, FMOLS, and the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel causality test, to estimate the environmental impact of the development of both bank and non-bank financial institutions.

Findings

The findings report that banking development, mutual funds and pension funds reduce the ecological footprint. Whilst the insurance market's development enhances the ecological footprint, it suggests heterogeneous and diverse impacts of financial institutions on environmental quality. On the disintegration of insurance funds, we found that both non-life and life insurance market development increases the ecological footprint (depicted in the Graphical abstract). The findings suggest comprehensive integration of ecological footprint quality in the investment/lending practices of financial institutions to mitigate environmental degradation in developed economies.

Originality/value

This study is the first of its kind to explore the impact of both financial (banks) and non-financial institutions' development on environmental degradation.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal