Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

– Buy-sell arrangements for the death of a co-owner may be funded with life insurance. Although many factors may enter the decision of whether to fund the buy-sell with life insurance, the degree of tolerance to risk is a major factor. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the risk aversion necessary to make life insurance funding the preferred option.

Design/methodology/approach

– The decision whether to use life insurance was modeled using the expected utility theorem under state-dependent utility. Aversion to risk was varied to determine at what risk aversion levels insurance was preferred. Analysis was done for difference ages and thus mortality risk and for difference levels of insurance markups.

Findings

– Life insurance funding is preferred at relatively low amounts of risk aversion, especially if the surviving partner becomes more risk averse upon the co-owner's death. A lower percentage of life insurance would be used if insurance premiums are significantly above actuarially fair premiums.

Practical implications

– Given currently available insurance rates, most closely held small businesses probably should fund their buy-sell arrangements activated upon death of a partner with life insurance. However, cash flow constraints may hinder insurance purchase and planning may be myopic in that more imminent strategy issues may be present that a future death.

Originality/value

– Although the use of life insurance to fund buy-sell arrangements is typically suggested for the small closely held business, little economic or financial analysis has been completed to date.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal