Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

This paper focuses upon the common law and developed legislative position to the ostensible ownership problem whereby a non‐owner in possession of a motor vehicle purports to pass a good title in favour of an innocent purchaser. It is argued that the traditional conflict of principle between the nemo dat doctrine and the civilian possession vaut titre approach cannot provide a satisfactory ex post solution to the ostensible ownership problems that arise in the motor vehicle and more general asset finance context. What is advocated is an ex ante solution, namely, a notification mechanism which could resolve the current legal dilemma of determining where the loss should fall.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal