Late in 2001, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) introduced a new set of arrangements for deposit protection in the UK. While the changes involve a welcome improvement on previous arrangements, much more could be done to enhance their overall cost‐effectiveness. This paper explains the flaws in previous and current arrangements and, using a relatively crude but nevertheless objective measure of the extent of their compliance with International Monetary Fund (IMF) best practice ‘rules’, compares their degree of ‘incentive‐compatibility’ (or economic efficiency ‐ ie the extent to which they minimise the problems created by adverse selection, moral hazard and principal/agency conflict) with the counterpart schemes operating elsewhere in the European Union and beyond. In this way, areas for future improvements are identified, which will ideally require accommodating changes in the guiding Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive.
Article navigation
1 June 2002
Review Article|
June 01 2002
Incentive compatibility and the optimal design of deposit protection schemes: An assessment of UK arrangements Available to Purchase
Maximilian J.B. Hall
Maximilian J.B. Hall
Economics Department, Loughborough University, Ashby Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK; tel: +44 (0)1509 222714; fax: +44 (0)1509 223910; e‐mail: m.j.hall1@lboro.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1740-0279
Print ISSN: 1358-1988
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (2002) 10 (2): 115–134.
Citation
Hall MJ (2002), "Incentive compatibility and the optimal design of deposit protection schemes: An assessment of UK arrangements". Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 10 No. 2 pp. 115–134, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980210810157
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
To polarise or not to polarise
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (June,2002)
FSA Consultation Paper 121 and the move to depolarisation ‐ A critical analysis
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (September,2002)
Supporting a risk‐based anti‐money laundering approach through enforcement action
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (March,2005)
Risk‐based regulation in the Financial Services Authority
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (December,2002)
Better than best execution? The Financial Services Authority’s new proposals to reform UK best execution requirements
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (March,2003)
Related Chapters
Consuming Animals, Constructing Naturalness
Transforming the Rural: Global Processes and Local Futures
Unsettling Spaces: Higher Education Institutions in the United Kingdom
As the World Turns: Implications of Global Shifts in Higher Education for Theory, Research and Practice
A REVIEW OF THE USE OF FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITES BY THE UK HIGHWAYS AGENCY
Challenges of Concrete Construction: Volume 1, Composite Materials in Concrete Construction
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
