Polarisation has been an integral part of how the retail financial services market operates in the UK, since its implementation in 1988. The term ‘polarisation’ refers to the practice whereby financial advisers must belong to one of two groups: either independent advisers able to advise the consumer on a range of financial services products, or tied agents who can only advise on the products of one company. In this paper, the author first sets out how the process of polarisation was implemented, before going on to consider the impact of the current two‐stage review by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of competition in financial service provision. He argues that while some change in the retail financial services market would be helpful there are considerable dangers in the FSA’s clear recommendation that polarisation should be abolished.
Article navigation
1 June 2002
Viewpoint|
June 01 2002
To polarise or not to polarise Available to Purchase
Paul Smee
Paul Smee
Director General, AIFA, Austin Friars House, 2‐6 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2HD, UK; tel: +44 (0)20 7826 9030; fax: +44 (0)20 7628 1678; e‐mail: paul@aifa.net
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1740-0279
Print ISSN: 1358-1988
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (2002) 10 (2): 135–140.
Citation
Smee P (2002), "To polarise or not to polarise". Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 10 No. 2 pp. 135–140, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980210810166
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Incentive compatibility and the optimal design of deposit protection schemes: An assessment of UK arrangements
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (June,2002)
FSA Consultation Paper 121 and the move to depolarisation ‐ A critical analysis
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (September,2002)
Supporting a risk‐based anti‐money laundering approach through enforcement action
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (March,2005)
Risk‐based regulation in the Financial Services Authority
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (December,2002)
Better than best execution? The Financial Services Authority’s new proposals to reform UK best execution requirements
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (March,2003)
Related Chapters
Successive Minority Governments – Yet Cooperation and Policy Reform
Public Governance in Denmark: Meeting the Global Mega-Challenges of the 21st Century?
Working With Paradoxes: How Shifts in Risks Are Altering Public Relations
Communication in Uncertain Times: How Organizations Deal with issues, Risks and Crises
Towards a (Dis)Integrated Europe: The Constructs of ‘Europe’ and ‘Troika’ Versus ‘Portugal’ and ‘The Portuguese’ in a Corpus of Portuguese Opinion Articles
National Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis: Doing and Undoing Europe
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
