This study compares those interim disclosures that managers desire to make with those they are required to make. Managers and regulators agree on the optimal degree of disclosure on growth potential and size. It appears that the less managers voluntarily disclose, the greater the firm's growth potential. This may be because managers feel that other evidence signals the good future prospects or the information indicating positive growth is too proprietary to reveal to competitors. Some differences are observed. Managers would pay more attention to the specific needs of their governance groups. Regulations would require more disclosure of variables indicating: business risk; capital structure; and growth. These differences in perceived need for disclosure highlight the importance of continued study of the optimal scope and scale of disclosure.
Article navigation
1 February 2000
Review Article|
February 01 2000
Desired vis‐à‐vis required interim disclosures
Hannu J. Schadewitz;
Hannu J. Schadewitz
University of Tampere, P.O. Box 607, 33101 Tampere, Finland
Search for other works by this author on:
Antti J. Kanto;
Antti J. Kanto
Professor of quantitative method in business at the Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration
Search for other works by this author on:
Hannu A. Kahra;
Hannu A. Kahra
Professor of Economics at the University of Oulu, Finland
Search for other works by this author on:
Dallas R. Blevins
Dallas R. Blevins
Professor of finance at the University of Montevallo, Montevallo, Alabama
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1740-0279
Print ISSN: 1358-1988
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (2000) 8 (2): 170–179.
Citation
Schadewitz HJ, Kanto AJ, Kahra HA, Blevins DR (2000), "Desired vis‐à‐vis required interim disclosures". Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 170–179, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025041
Download citation file:
132
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Investment analysts’ perception of disclosure in UK interim financial reports
Journal of Applied Accounting Research (December,2007)
Interim financial reporting disclosure by listed firms in the Asia-Pacific region and influencing factors
Pacific Accounting Review (November,2022)
Effective interim leadership and management: development of a cyclical model of interim assignments
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance (July,2020)
A review of effective interim leadership and management: a cyclical model of interim assignments
Human Resource Management International Digest (October,2020)
The interim manager – a catalyst for organizational learning?
The Learning Organization: An International Journal (May,2022)
Related Chapters
Preliminary feedback on the Interim Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment for UK reservoirs, 2004
Improvements in reservoir construction, operation and maintenance: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the British Dam Society at the University of Durham from 6 to 9 September 2006
Application of the Interim Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment across multiple dam owners by multiple Jacobs offices
Ensuring reservoir safety into the future: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the British Dam Society at the University of Warwick from 10–13 September 2008
Interim storage of spent KNK II breeder fuel elements
FAST REACTOR FUEL CYCLES
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
