Existing caisson foundations, utilised for offshore wind turbines, are required to resist significant lateral loads and overturning moments generated by wind and currents. This paper presents an innovative type of foundation, a ‘winged caisson foundation’, to support offshore wind turbines, which has the ability to provide a larger overturning capacity compared with standard caisson designs. Through a series of small-scale experiments at 1g conditions, the competence of the proposed foundations was examined. Different models with various wing sizes and different soil densities were tested in the laboratory under overturning loadings and the results were compared with a standard caisson. The moment–rotation performance of the foundation under both monotonic and cyclic loading was examined to assess the potential benefits of adding wings to caisson foundations. The results showed that there is a significant increase (up to 75%) in overturning capacity provided by the novel foundation, demonstrating its great potential over standard caissons for use in offshore wind turbine foundations.
Article navigation
October 2020
Editors
Research Article|
January 13 2020
Monotonic and cyclic lateral load tests on monopod winged caisson foundations in sand
Koohyar Faizi, BSc, MSc;
Koohyar Faizi, BSc, MSc
PhD student, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK (corresponding author: k.faizi@pgr.bham.ac.uk; koohyar.faizi@yahoo.com)
Search for other works by this author on:
Asaad Faramarzi, BSc, MSc, PhD, FHEA;
Asaad Faramarzi, BSc, MSc, PhD, FHEA
Assistant Professor, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Samir Dirar, BSc (Hons), MPhil (Cantab), PhD (Cantab), PCAP, FHEA;
Samir Dirar, BSc (Hons), MPhil (Cantab), PhD (Cantab), PCAP, FHEA
Associate Professor, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
David Chapman, BSc(Hons), DIS, PhD, CEng, MICE, FHEA
David Chapman, BSc(Hons), DIS, PhD, CEng, MICE, FHEA
Professor, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
March 12 2019
Accepted:
December 02 2019
Online ISSN: 1751-8563
Print ISSN: 1353-2618
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2020
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (2020) 173 (5): 448–460.
Article history
Received:
March 12 2019
Accepted:
December 02 2019
Citation
Faizi K, Faramarzi A, Dirar S, Chapman D (2020), "Monotonic and cyclic lateral load tests on monopod winged caisson foundations in sand". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 173 No. 5 pp. 448–460, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.19.00056
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Serviceability of suction caisson founded offshore structures
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (December,2016)
Characterising the model uncertainty of ISO methods for punch-through capacity prediction
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (August,2021)
Effect of the installation process on monopile lateral response
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (September,2021)
Observation of sand movement during bucket installation
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (November,2017)
Development of a combined VHM loading apparatus for a geotechnical drum centrifuge
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (March,2013)
Related Chapters
Tower crane bases
Temporary Works: Principles of Design and Construction
Introduction to earthquake geotechnical engineering in relation to foundation design
Seismic Design of Foundations: Concepts and applications
Selection of strong motion for foundation design
Seismic Design of Foundations: Concepts and applications
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
