Integral bridges are preferred on infrastructure schemes as they have lower maintenance costs than a conventional jointed bridge. A key aspect of integral bridge design is the assessment of long-term passive resistance that develops in the abutment backfill due to seasonal movements of the superstructure. This resistance is currently defined by an intermediate earth pressure coefficient termed K*, and is typically evaluated using the limit equilibrium (LE) approach prescribed in BSI PD-6694-1:2011+A1:2020. This paper adopts the alternative numerical design approach and investigates the development of K* behind full-height abutments using soil–structure interaction (SSI) modelling in Plaxis-2D software. The study demonstrates that mobilised passive resistance is primarily a function of backfill and structural stiffnesses, and that the current LE approach does not capture the backfill resistance profile correctly. The effectiveness of the SSI method was verified by comparison to the LE method. The current study provides an SSI methodology that is an efficient design approach, and which is suitable for a wide variety of integral bridge arrangements beyond the current LE method applicability.
Article navigation
December 2024
Research Article|
December 02 2024
Soil–structure interaction behind integral bridge abutments
Michael Wiechecki, BEng, MIEAust;
Michael Wiechecki, BEng, MIEAust
Principal Geotechnical Engineer, WSP Australia Pty Limited, Perth, Australia (corresponding author: michael.wiechecki@wsp.com, mike.wiechecki86@gmail.com)
Search for other works by this author on:
Indrasenan Thusyanthan, BA/MEng, PhD, CEng;
Indrasenan Thusyanthan, BA/MEng, PhD, CEng
Managing Director, Gavin & Doherty Geosolutions Ltd, London, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Nowak, BSc, ARSM, CEng, CGeol;
Paul Nowak, BSc, ARSM, CEng, CGeol
Technical Director, Infrastructure Geotechnics, Atkins member of the SNC-Lavalin Group, Epsom, Atkins, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Jessica Sandberg, BEng, CEng, MICE
Jessica Sandberg, BEng, CEng, MICE
Senior Bridge Engineer, Atkins member of the SNC-Lavalin Group, Epsom, Atkins, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
June 12 2022
Accepted:
April 10 2023
Online ISSN: 1751-8563
Print ISSN: 1353-2618
Emerald Publishing Limited: All rights reserved
2024
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (2024) 177 (6): 601–614.
Article history
Received:
June 12 2022
Accepted:
April 10 2023
Citation
Wiechecki M, Thusyanthan I, Nowak P, Sandberg J (2024), "Soil–structure interaction behind integral bridge abutments". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 177 No. 6 pp. 601–614, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.22.00115
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Rigorous lower and upper bounds for the 3D passive earth pressure problem
Geotechnique Letters (December,2019)
On the development of effective heave pressure in deep excavations
Geotechnique (November,2024)
Limit-state solutions for the active earth pressure behind walls rotating about the base
Geotechnique (November,2023)
Effect of structural boundaries and stress history on at-rest soil pressure of sand
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (April,2020)
Landslide influence zone – a hidden hazard
Geotechnique (July,2020)
Related Chapters
Dynamic response of flexible square tunnels: centrifuge testing and validation of existing design methodologies
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2015
Some remarks on the seismic behaviour of embedded cantilevered retaining walls
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2015
Reliability of traditional retaining wall design
Risk and Variability in Geotechnical Engineering
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
