Purpose

This paper aims to evaluate Morocco’s Whole-of-Government (WoG) framework during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake, applying complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory to assess its effectiveness with minimal international aid. Through extensive stakeholder engagement and real-time analysis, it examines interagency coordination among civilian and military actors and their interactions with external nongovernmental responders. This study identifies strengths and weaknesses within the WoG framework and presents a strategic roadmap with practical recommendations to enhance disaster resilience, offering valuable insights for Morocco and other middle-income countries facing similar challenges.

Design/methodology/approach

Framed by CAS theory, this research uses a rigorous mixed-methods approach through a collaborative case study methodology. Qualitative insights were derived from on-site observations and interviews with 126 stakeholders, including survivors. At the same time, quantitative data were collected through content analysis from multiple sources and rigorously triangulated to capture the full spectrum of WoG mobilization. The data were processed using TAMS Analyzer, and systemic evaluation was conducted through the M-MACBETH methodology, supported by a 21-member expert group. Informed by the assessment results and international best practices, this paper presents an actionable roadmap aimed at building a stronger and more flexible disaster management (DM) system.

Findings

The case study reveals that Morocco’s experience offers both a warning and a blueprint for future disaster response efforts. Although the WoG framework successfully coordinated military, civilian and political leadership, weaknesses in local preparedness, civil society integration and misinformation management reduced the overall effectiveness of the response. Aligned with CAS principles and informed by global best practices, the research advocates creating a National Emergency Management Agency with a comprehensive nationwide organigram to balance community-led initiatives with centralized authority, fostering a more resilient, adaptive and coordinated DM system.

Originality/value

This paper addresses a key research gap by applying CAS theory to a real-world disaster in the underexplored North African context. It offers a detailed, first-hand evaluation of Morocco’s WoG framework, assessing its ability to manage a large-scale disaster with minimal yet selective international aid. This study paves the way for comparative research across regions, disaster types and governance models while providing a practical roadmap for Morocco and similar nations to transition toward a Whole-of-Society strategy for DM, enhancing long-term resilience.

On September 8, 2023, Morocco was struck by the Al Haouz earthquake, one of the most devastating natural disasters in its history. Recorded at Mw 6.8 by the United States Geological Survey, the earthquake’s epicenter was located near Ighil in the Al Haouz province, 72 km southwest of Marrakech. Tremors extended over 500 km, affecting an area of more than 31,000 km2 – comparable to the size of Belgium. A significant aftershock, measured at Mw 4.9, further compounded the disaster’s devastating effects.

The earthquake’s impact was catastrophic. According to the Moroccan Ministry of the Interior, 2,960 lives were lost, with 5,674 people injured, primarily in the provinces of Al Haouz and Taroudant. Nearly 500,000 individuals were displaced, including 380,000 severely affected near the epicenter. Housing destruction was extensive, with 60,000 homes damaged and 19,000 completely demolished. Critical infrastructure suffered severe disruptions: over 530 educational institutions were affected, 50,000 households were left without basic services and 20 main roads were rendered inaccessible, along with over 100 rural tracks blocked by landslides and debris.

In response to these multifaceted challenges, Morocco adopted a Whole-of-Government (WoG) approach – a governance framework designed to unify governmental actors for coordinated and effective disaster response (DR). This domestically driven strategy integrated military assets, civil departments and agencies under centralized decision-making. International aid was selectively accepted from the UK, Spain, Qatar and the UAE, raising critical questions about Morocco’s capacity for autonomous DM, particularly given its socioeconomic vulnerabilities and proximity to Europe, which amplifies cross-continental impacts.

The WoG approach has been extensively explored by scholars who have significantly contributed to its conceptual and practical development. Shergold (2004) highlighted its role in addressing interdepartmental challenges through unified governance, whereas Ostrom (1990) emphasized collaborative frameworks central to intergovernmental coordination. Moravcsik (2013) contextualized the dynamics of state-driven integration underpinning WoG mechanisms. In the specific context of DM, scholars such as ‘t Hart and Tummers (2014), Boin et al. (2016) underlined the importance of adaptive leadership and interagency coordination for effective crisis management. McConnell (2011) complemented these insights by evaluating the balance between coordination and adaptability in WoG responses.

This case study examines Morocco’s WoG DR framework, assessing its internal integration and performance while critically analyzing its engagement with broader environmental actors, including Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), community stakeholders and media. As a complex system, the WoG approach is expected to dynamically interact with its environment, leveraging contributions from diverse actors to optimize resource mobilization and enhance response outcomes. Identified gaps in these interactions highlight critical areas for improvement.

A central feature of the WoG approach was the involvement of the Royal Armed Forces, which played a pivotal role in logistical support and coordination. The integration of military and civilian actors highlights the importance of civilian–military relations in effective DM, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Scholars such as Huntington (1981), Burk (2002) and Janowitz (2017) offered diverse perspectives on military involvement in civilian operations, ranging from advocating strict separation to promoting active engagement. This study analyzes first-hand cooperation practices within the WoG framework, assessing their effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement.

While the WoG approach emphasizes interagency coordination among government entities, the broader Whole-of-Society (WoS) framework advocates for inclusive collaboration with civil society, the private sector and communities. Ortenzi et al. (2022) highlighted WoG’s government-centric focus, contrasting it with WoS’s emphasis on collective action. Kjellén et al. (2023) and Burris and Terry (2023) echoed this distinction, arguing that integrating nonstate actors is essential for effective disaster resilience. The United Nations (UN) further underscores resilience as a shared responsibility, advocating broader societal engagement. Aligning Morocco’s WoG framework with the transformative advantages of the WoS approach could enhance its inclusivity and adaptability, paving the way for a more holistic DR strategy.

Our study highlights disaster resilience in North Africa – a region frequently overlooked despite its considerable vulnerabilities and complex geopolitical challenges. Governance issues, political dynamics and socioeconomic constraints often obstruct the implementation of adaptive DM systems. By examining Morocco’s response to this earthquake, the research investigates how these factors shaped the WoG framework’s strengths and limitations.

This case offers a valuable lens to assess the WoG framework in a middle-income country contending with resource constraints and rural vulnerabilities. The study emphasizes the framework’s application across three key dimensions: operational effectiveness, stakeholder coordination and adaptability and flexibility, providing actionable recommendations to enhance DM systems in Morocco and similar contexts.

The central research question guiding this study is: To what extent was Morocco’s WoG response effective in managing the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake? To address this, four interrelated subresearch questions (SRQs) are explored:

SRQ1.

How did the adopted approach influence the operational effectiveness of the response to the 2023 earthquake?

SRQ2.

How did the WoG framework foster stakeholder coordination while supporting adaptability and flexibility in Morocco’s DR?

SRQ3.

What were the key strengths and challenges in Morocco’s use of a WoG approach with limited international assistance?

SRQ4.

What practical lessons can be drawn from this experience to enhance disaster resilience and management in Morocco and other countries facing similar challenges?

To address these research questions, it is crucial to define key terms central to evaluating the WoG framework. In this study, effectiveness refers to the framework’s ability to achieve DR goals through timely, targeted outcomes, such as minimizing delays and optimizing resources, whereas influence reflects the role of feedback loops and real-time adjustments in shaping and enhancing its overall performance. Together, these concepts offer a focused lens to assess the adaptability and precision of the WoG approach during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake.

Grounded in complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory, this study uses principles such as feedback loops, self-organization and adaptability to evaluate Morocco’s WoG framework. A mixed-methods approach – incorporating extensive fieldwork, in-depth interviews, comprehensive content analysis and M-MACBETH methodology guided by an expert panel – supports this evaluation. Lessons from proven international best practices and successful initiatives are incorporated into a proposed roadmap to guide future policy adaptations and refine DM strategies in Morocco and similar contexts worldwide.

Finally, by focusing on governance structures, civilian–military coordination and sociopolitical dynamics, this study contributes to the broader literature by offering a critical examination of Morocco’s DM framework. It assesses the effectiveness of the WoG approach during the earthquake response, providing a robust evaluation of adaptive governance mechanisms in dynamic crises and laying the groundwork for comparative analyses of DM systems across diverse national contexts.

The remainder of the paper is structured as follows: Section 2 covers the theoretical foundation, Section 3 outlines the methodology, Section 4 presents the findings, discussing key successes and challenges within the WoG framework, and Section 5 addresses broader implications, offering an actionable roadmap to strengthen future DM resilience. Section 6 concludes with key insights from the case study.

CAS theory provides a robust foundation for evaluating Morocco’s WoG approach during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake. By emphasizing principles like feedback loops, self-organization and adaptability, CAS captures the dynamic coordination and resource management essential in DM. This theoretical lens addresses critical gaps, particularly in underexplored North African contexts, by exploring how comprehensive systems like WoG operationalize these principles to manage complexity and uncertainty effectively.

CAS theory offers an ideal framework for analyzing the intricate dynamics of Morocco’s governmental response during the Al Haouz earthquake. As Holling (1973) emphasized, complex systems must adapt to maintain functionality under external pressures, whereas Hollnagel (2015) highlighted resilience as the capacity to absorb disruptions and reorganize to sustain performance – both essential to the WoG framework. This adaptive, multilayered system integrates governmental entities and external actors like NGOs and local communities, enabling coordinated, flexible responses in rapidly evolving disaster scenarios.

These interactions shape resource mobilization, coordination strategies and adaptability during the response. NGOs, while external to the WoG framework, acted as critical contributors by providing localized relief. Their actions, influenced by CAS dynamics, created feedback loops that informed governmental adjustments and enhanced system responsiveness. This dynamic interplay aligns with Comfort’s (2007) emphasis on real-time collaboration and iterative learning and reflects Holland’s (2000) principle of emergence, where local interactions yield system-level coherence. The seamless integration of military, civilian and community actors also demonstrates Tierney’s (2019) focus on adaptive leadership and flexibility in DM.

Framing the WoG framework as a complex system through CAS theory provides a nuanced understanding of how governmental operations synergize with external elements, showcasing the adaptability, innovation and resilience required to manage disaster scenarios with strategic precision.

The application of CAS theory in DM has gained attention for explaining decentralized coordination in dynamic, multistakeholder environments. CAS principles provide critical insights into how actors adapt to changing disaster conditions, yet their integration into comprehensive frameworks like the WoG approach remains underexplored in large-scale disasters.

Comfort (1994) highlighted self-organization as vital for mutual learning and adaptation in communities affected by earthquakes. However, her work focused on local-level coordination, leaving national and cross-sector integration underexamined. Shi et al. (2021) explored civil–military collaboration in China, showing the effectiveness of decentralized resource allocation but with limited applicability to regions with distinct civil–military dynamics. Zhang et al. (2016) similarly emphasized self-organization but restricted their analysis to localized systems.

Kapucu and Garayev (2016) compared horizontal and vertical DM networks, finding decentralized systems more adaptable and resource-efficient in rapidly evolving crises. Waugh and Streib (2006), reflecting on Hurricane Katrina, critiqued hierarchical responses for hindering adaptability, advocating decentralized models. However, neither study explored these systems in integrated WoG frameworks.

In humanitarian logistics (HL), Schiffling et al. (2022) demonstrated resilience emerging from self-organizing behaviors, whereas Piraina and Trucco (2022) examined nonlinear interactions in logistics. Both studies neglected essential cross-sector coordination. Wu et al. (2024) highlighted adaptive feedback loops enabling real-time adjustments by local governments in China, whereas Coetzee et al. (2016) focused on self-organization in low-income communities. Sadeghi et al. (2021) emphasized scaling self-organization in complex systems but noted gaps in broader applications.

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed further CAS applications. Guo et al. (2021) explored self-organizing networks in China’s public health system, whereas Hong and Lim (2023) emphasized governance failures in South Korea. Haraguchi (2020) highlighted feedback loops in civil–military coordination but noted challenges in centralized systems.

In summary, although CAS principles have been applied to DM, their role in WoG frameworks remains insufficiently explored. This study addresses this gap by focusing on feedback loops, self-organization and adaptability to critically evaluate Morocco’s response to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake.

The CAS theory provides a robust framework for analyzing Morocco’s WoG response to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake. CASs are dynamic networks of interacting agents – such as individuals, organizations and technologies – that evolve and adapt to changing internal and external conditions. Defined by principles like feedback loops, self-organization and adaptability, CAS emphasizes resilience and innovation, making it particularly suited to evaluating the intricate dynamics of DM.

While the selected principles form the backbone of this study, other CAS principles, though valuable in broader contexts, were excluded to focus on the immediate dynamics of DR. Table 1 systematically outlines the rationale for inclusion and exclusion, ensuring a practical and analytically robust framework.

Table 1

Selection and exclusion of CAS principles for evaluating the WoG framework

CAS principleInclusion/exclusionRationale
Feedback loopsIncludedCrucial for real-time communication and adaptive strategies. They enable continuous learning and recalibration, ensuring responsive and precise resource allocation during dynamic disaster scenarios
Self-organizationIncludedCentral to fostering decentralized coordination. It allows agents, like communities or government bodies, to form adaptive structures autonomously, ensuring speed and flexibility in operations
AdaptabilityIncludedKey to evaluating flexibility and responsiveness, this principle reflects how the WoG framework adjusted strategies and resources across disaster phases, maintaining operational continuity
NonlinearityExcludedWhile inherent in disasters, its effects are captured through feedback loops. Broader applications, like managing cascading outcomes, are more relevant to long-term planning than immediate responses
Co-evolutionExcludedFocused on mutual adaptation over time, coevolution is essential for long-term system resilience but less applicable to the immediate, high-intensity demands of DR
TaggingExcludedWhile useful for identifying roles and organizing resources, tagging overlaps with self-organization and offers limited added value in short-term DM contexts
Diversity and redundancyExcludedImportant for ensuring system robustness and fallback options, diversity and redundancy are more applicable to long-term system resilience than to time-critical DR operations
AggregationExcludedRelevant for studying collective patterns in stable systems, aggregation is less critical for evaluating immediate coordination and operational effectiveness during disasters
EmergenceExcludedEmbedded within self-organization, emergence reflects decentralized actions leading to system-wide behaviors. Its separate inclusion would be redundant for this analysis
Decentralized controlExcludedIntegral to self-organization, decentralized control supports localized decision-making. Including it separately is unnecessary, as its role is captured under broader evaluations of decentralized collaboration
Building blocksExcludedRefer to modular components forming complex systems. While essential for scalability and long-term design, they are less relevant to the immediate demands of DR, which prioritize real-time adaptability over modularity
Source: Authors’ own work

The principles of Feedback Loops, Self-Organization and Adaptability are central to understanding Morocco’s WoG response. These principles capture the dynamic interplay among governmental entities and external actors like NGOs and local communities. For example, feedback loops facilitated real-time information sharing between field units and command centers, enabling rapid adjustments to resource distribution. Self-organization allowed local communities to autonomously mobilize and address immediate needs, complementing centralized efforts. Adaptability was reflected in the system’s ability to reallocate resources and adjust operational priorities as disaster phases evolved.

Although principles like Nonlinearity and Co-evolution offer valuable insights in broader contexts, they were excluded to focus on the immediate dynamics of DR. Feedback Loops, Self-Organization and Adaptability capture the dynamic interplay among governmental entities, NGOs and local communities. For example, real-time information sharing between command centers and field units enabled rapid adjustments, whereas autonomous community efforts filled critical gaps. Adaptability allowed resource reallocation and operational prioritization as disaster phases evolved.

This study highlights Morocco’s capacity to integrate complex interdependencies, recalibrate strategies under uncertainty and innovate in high-pressure scenarios. By focusing on practical applications of CAS principles, it bridges theoretical insights with real-world practice, offering actionable recommendations for adaptive governance and disaster resilience in resource-constrained environments.

The alignment of our selected CAS principles with DM outcomes forms a robust framework for evaluating Morocco’s WoG response. By operationalizing these principles, the study bridges theoretical insights with practical evaluation, ensuring a thorough assessment of the framework’s effectiveness.

Table 2 outlines how each CAS principle aligns with specific research variables, offering clear definitions and measurable criteria. This structured approach emphasizes the interplay between CAS principles and DM variables, enabling a precise evaluation of the WoG framework’s strengths and areas for improvement.

Table 2

Framework for evaluating Morocco’s WoG response: operationalizing CAS principles with aligned scope and variables

CAS principleAligned research variableVariable conceptual alignmentVariable definition/descriptionOperationalization
Feedback loopsOperational effectivenessGrounded in the principle of Feedback Loops, this variable emphasizes the integration of real-time information to recalibrate priorities, optimize resource allocation and maintain situational awareness. It also highlights the resilience of logistical chains, effective communication systems and precise command-and-control mechanisms for rapid and impactful responses“Operational effectiveness” refers to a DM framework's capacity to achieve objectives efficiently under dynamic, resource-constrained conditions. It encompasses the timely deployment of resources, infrastructure readiness and seamless execution of response strategies– Facilitating real-time information exchange among decision-makers and field units to dynamically allocate resources
– Making iterative adjustments to operations based on evolving situational updates
– Balancing centralized planning with decentralized execution to enhance WoG responsiveness and agility
Self-organizationStakeholder coordinationAnchored in the CAS principle of Self-Organization, this variable emphasizes interactions within governmental bodies and with external actors, such as Civil Society and NGOs, to achieve cohesive outcomes. It highlights the importance of trust-building, information sharing, role clarity and adaptive management to address evolving complexities while minimizing inefficiencies like redundancy or resource competition“Stakeholder coordination” refers to the alignment and collaboration among interagency, interdepartmental and cross-sectoral entities during DR efforts. It assesses how effective coordination fosters systemic resilience by enabling autonomous decision-making within a unified framework and harmonizing individual efforts with collective objectives– Encouraging autonomous collaboration between civilian and military agencies to tackle logistical challenges
– Facilitating the emergence of interagency frameworks during crisis conditions to streamline operations
– Engaging external stakeholders (e.g. NGOs) in a manner that supports and aligns with the integrity of the WoG framework
AdaptabilityAdaptability and flexibilityRooted in the CAS principle of adaptability, the “Adaptability and Flexibility” variable captures the system's ability to adjust dynamically to changing circumstances, challenges or demands. It emphasizes the capacity to respond effectively to evolving conditions, ensuring resilience and continuity while maintaining functionality and addressing evolving complexities in disaster contexts“Adaptability and flexibility,” treated as a single variable, refers to the system's capability to dynamically adjust strategies and resource allocations in response to evolving conditions and unforeseen challenges, ensuring resilience and continuity of efforts. “Adaptability” emphasizes structural and procedural adjustments to address changing needs, whereas “flexibility” highlights versatility in operations and resource utilization without compromising functionality– Adjusting strategies dynamically to respond to changing priorities and unforeseen challenges
– Ensuring flexibility in reallocating resources and adapting roles during various disaster phases, such as transitioning from SAR to recovery
– Leveraging diverse tools and assets, including military and civilian resources, to address situational constraints effectively
– Integrating unplanned resources seamlessly to support response efforts without disrupting overall objectives
Source: Authors’ own work

This targeted framework highlights the operational dynamics of the WoG framework, offering actionable insights for enhancing DR strategies while maintaining a strong theoretical foundation.

The Moroccan DR framework is a cornerstone of this country’s approach to managing a variety of natural disasters, including floods, seismic activities, forest fires and landslides. Situated in Northwest Africa, Morocco’s diverse landscapes, from coastal plains to mountain ranges, necessitate a robust and adaptive DM strategy. Since 2015, Morocco has implemented an advanced regionalization plan, dividing the country into 12 administrative regions, each governed by a Regional Governor (Wali) appointed by the King. This administrative structure is further subdivided into prefectures and provinces, each led by a Governor, supported by local elected bodies such as regional and prefectural councils.

To effectively manage disasters, Morocco uses comprehensive strategies like the ORganisation des SECours (ORSEC), or Rescue Organization plan. Contrary to the common misconception, noted in studies like Ivčević et al. (2021), ORSEC is specific to Morocco’s DM system, distinct from “Organisation de la Réponse de SEcurité Civile.”

Since its establishment in 1970 and subsequent enhancements in 1983, further improved after the 2004 Al Hoceima earthquake, the ORSEC Plan includes the Monitoring and Coordination Center, established in 2007 for national-level response coordination. Updated in 2016, the plan now incorporates a system for managing postdisaster impacts through insurance and subsidies. In 2021, the National Strategy for Natural Disaster Risk Management (2020–2030) was integrated into ORSEC, focusing on risk assessment, prevention and efficient recovery.

Figure 1 illustrates the ORSEC Plan’s objectives, including establishing a proactive relief command structure, defining roles within a clear DR framework and systematically cataloging resources from interagency and private sectors.

Figure 1

ORSEC plan objectives and framework for DM

Figure 1

ORSEC plan objectives and framework for DM

Close modal

The activation of the ORSEC Plan by Governors initiates the mobilization of critical resources and personnel, entailing the establishment of a Ministry-level Monitoring and Coordination Center for centralized decision-making. This process is reinforced by a Fixed Command Post at prefectural or provincial headquarters and an Operational Command Post near disaster sites, ensuring effective on-site management and coordination. This leads to the establishment of a dedicated structure ensuring a coordinated involvement of key actors across the territorial spectrum, as depicted in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Multilevel structure in responding to disasters under the ORSEC plan

Figure 2

Multilevel structure in responding to disasters under the ORSEC plan

Close modal

In scenarios where a disaster’s magnitude exceeds the capacity of existing structures, the army’s involvement becomes essential, as mandated by Royal Decree N°1185-66. The army plays a critical role across multiple phases of DR under the Asset Deployment Plan. The integration of this plan into Morocco’s DR framework exemplifies the WoG approach, ensuring complementarity among national resources and the necessary interoperability across different operational levels. Figure 3 illustrates the army’s structured approach within the Asset Deployment Plan, facilitating a comprehensive and coordinated response to various disaster scenarios.

Figure 3

The Royal Armed Forces’ four-phase DR cycle

Figure 3

The Royal Armed Forces’ four-phase DR cycle

Close modal

The army’s DM strategy, primarily conducted through the Monitoring and Surveillance Unit, involves strategic oversight and coordination with the Ministry of the Interior. Shifting from traditional military “command and control” models, the Asset Deployment Plan emphasizes Operational Command Chains and Coordination with Civil Authorities, fostering a more collaborative and civilian-oriented strategy.

This transition is pivotal in amalgamating military precision with civil administrative efficiency in DM contexts. Figure 4 shows the Royal Armed Forces’ strategy in responding to disasters under the Asset Deployment Plan framework.

Figure 4

The Royal Armed Forces’ multilevel asset deployment plan

Figure 4

The Royal Armed Forces’ multilevel asset deployment plan

Close modal

In such circumstances, the development of effective coordination structures is crucial for maintaining situational awareness and bolstering civil–military operational synergy. At the Ministry level, the Monitoring and Coordination Center plays a pivotal role in coordinating various DR efforts and facilitating cross-departmental decision-making. This cooperative framework extends from the central government to regional, provincial and local levels, involving both military and civil authorities in established command posts and coordination centers. This integration is designed to ensure a rapid and efficient response at the ground level, as detailed in Figure 5.

Figure 5

Information and resource flow within multilevel WoG structures

Figure 5

Information and resource flow within multilevel WoG structures

Close modal

The integration of military strategic capabilities with civilian administrative strengths in the ORSEC plan, tailored to address both natural and technological disasters, is fundamental to maintaining Morocco’s socioeconomic stability. Implementing the WoG approach not only effectively mitigates disaster impacts but also significantly enhances the country’s preparedness, responsiveness and recovery capacity. Through this integrated framework, Morocco establishes a standard in balancing strategic military involvement with proficient civil governance for optimal DR.

Overall, our research critically evaluates Morocco’s DR framework, using the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake as a case study to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Grounded in CAS principles, it operationalizes Feedback Loops, Self-Organization and Adaptability to assess Operational Effectiveness, Stakeholder Coordination and Adaptability and Flexibility. This integration offers a nuanced understanding of DR mechanisms, emphasizing dynamic interplay within the WoG framework and providing a solid foundation for Section 3, where these variables are rigorously analyzed with advanced tools.

Our research methodology for studying DM is grounded in a robust framework. We used a case study approach, guided by the frameworks of Vega’s (2018) framework, to critically analyze stakeholder dynamics and logistical challenges within the WoG framework during DR. This approach necessitated direct engagement with DM professionals and the local populations affected by the disaster, demanding our physical and emotional presence. We placed a strong emphasis on empathy and care, parallel to establishing robust data triangulation for a comprehensive analysis.

To ensure a well-rounded evaluation of the earthquake response, we formed an expert group, bridging the gap between academic research and practical application, aligning with Altay et al. (2021) and Kovács et al. (2018). Figures 6 and 7 visually represent our methodology, depicting our comprehensive research timeline and framework, respectively.

Figure 6

Timeframe of the case study steps

Figure 6

Timeframe of the case study steps

Close modal
Figure 7

Comprehensive research methodology framework

Figure 7

Comprehensive research methodology framework

Close modal

Our study uses a comprehensive data collection process to evaluate the WoG approach in response to the Al Haouz earthquake. Using a systematic methodology over a 25-day fieldwork period, we conducted site visits, interviews and surveys across the Marrakech-Safi and Souss-Massa regions.

Guided by the framework of Kunz et al. (2017), we integrated direct observations, content analysis and interviews to capture all critical components of Morocco’s WoG approach. The fieldwork covered 1,000 km across 20 urban and rural sites, including multilevel command posts, logistics structures, civilian medical facilities and Military Mobile Surgical Field Hospitals, focusing on assessing the effectiveness of Morocco’s DR framework during this crisis.

The development of our questionnaire is depicted in Figure 8, illustrating the process that began with the conceptual operationalization of our research questions and objectives. This foundational step translated our aims into specific core concepts essential for effective inquiry, ensuring the validity and relevance of the interviews by anchoring them in established literature. These core concepts subsequently informed the formulation of research objectives and the sequencing of interview questions (see  Appendix 1), accommodating a diverse array of respondents – including responders and recipients – across varying qualifications, functions and educational backgrounds.

Figure 8

The development process of our literature-informed questionnaire

Figure 8

The development process of our literature-informed questionnaire

Close modal

Rather than adhering strictly to a formal interview format with rigid questions, we adopted a flexible approach that used the questions as a foundation for open-ended discussions. This approach encouraged interviewees to share their unique insights and perspectives, fostering richer dialogue and enhancing the depth and quality of the data collected.

In addition, local guides were instrumental in navigating cultural norms and language barriers, including Dialectal Arabic and Tachelhit, spoken in the High Atlas region. Besides, daily debriefings, accurate transcriptions and iterative analysis ensured meticulous documentation. Interviews were transcribed daily, with details verified within 48 h. Clarifications were sought when necessary, and proofreading involved cross-validation and random sampling to ensure data reliability. This rigorous process culminated in a comprehensive and representative narrative of the earthquake’s impact and the ongoing role of the WoG approach in DM.

Furthermore, the key to our data collection was a meticulous sampling strategy, integrating purposive and snowball techniques. For this purpose, selecting participants was a critical process, guided by the following criteria:

  • Relevance: Participants included DM professionals and local earthquake survivors experiencing the disaster firsthand.

  • Diversity and inclusivity: The sample included diverse demographics – gender, age, health, socioeconomic, urban/rural and ethnic/linguistic backgrounds.

  • Transparency and fairness: Used random sampling to avoid biases and ensure balanced participant representation.

  • Ethical considerations: Ensured informed consent, confidentiality, privacy and respect for cultural norms.

Finally, to address our dual objectives of generalizing findings to a broader population and gaining a nuanced understanding of DM evaluation at the individual level, we strategically selected a sample of 126 participants. The diverse group, including 33 earthquake survivors, provided valuable WoG approach insights, balancing diversity with manageable in-depth analysis.

Moreover, the research involved a 21-member expert panel, assembled progressively throughout our fieldwork, all possessing extensive experience in DM. Their diverse expertise and qualifications, respectively, highlighted and elaborated upon in  Appendix 2 and  3, proved essential in the evaluation of the DR framework, significantly enriching the clarity and relevance of our research findings.

Following our fieldwork, we conducted a rigorous 21-day process of meticulous data proofreading and quality control. Guided by Rath (2016), the process involved team discussions, peer debriefing and external peer reviews to ensure accuracy and reliability. We then initiated the data processing phase for structured organization, focusing on data categorization and clustering using TAMS Analyzer.

Figure 9 illustrates our systematic approach, enabling a nuanced and comprehensive analysis of DM dynamics within the WoG approach. As a result, we processed and organized 28 key elements related to the WoG framework, clustering them into nine main aspects (see  Appendix 4). These elements were analyzed through the lens of CAS principles, providing deeper insights into how these principles were operationalized within Morocco’s DM framework during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake response.

Figure 9

TAMS analyzer methodology overview

Figure 9

TAMS analyzer methodology overview

Close modal

To bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and the practical realities encountered during the Al Haouz earthquake response, this study adopts a collaborative, multidimensional evaluation approach. The M-MACBETH methodology, as developed by Bana e Costa et al. (2016), serves as the core analytical tool, enabling the quantification of qualitative judgments. Recognizing that most members of the expert panel are practitioners with limited familiarity with theoretical concepts, CAS principles were simplified into actionable variables for greater accessibility and engagement.

The evaluation focuses on three key dimensions of the DR framework:

  1. Operational Effectiveness;

  2. Stakeholder Coordination; and

  3. Adaptability and Flexibility.

These dimensions, previously defined as the study’s research variables, correspond directly to the CAS principles of Feedback Loops, Self-Organization and Adaptability. Each variable is distinct and independent, reflecting a separate critical aspect of the WoG approach.

The evaluation ensures that all components and key aspects of the response framework are analyzed, quantified and systematically prioritized. This approach is aligned with the methodological rigor required to integrate expert insights into a coherent and actionable framework.

Our recruited panel of experts, actively engaged in ongoing DM operations, was convened to conduct the evaluation, leveraging their expertise and firsthand insights for a comprehensive and contextually grounded assessment.

Despite logistical challenges – including connectivity issues in remote areas – the process spanned 28 days and used virtual meetings, telephone interviews and email exchanges. These structured interactions facilitated the following:

  • Semantic precision: Experts provided clear, context-sensitive judgments on the components of the WoG framework.

  • Pairwise comparisons: Participants assessed the relative importance and effectiveness of each component using pairwise evaluations.

  • Consensus building: Through iterative discussions, the group reached an agreement on the significance and hierarchy of the WoG framework's elements.

Figure 10 illustrates the M-MACBETH evaluation process, showing how the methodology supports the systematic analysis of theoretical insights while maintaining alignment with the practical experiences of the expert panel. This approach ensures a balanced, detailed evaluation of the WoG framework.

Figure 10

M-MACBETH evaluation process for WoG approach

Figure 10

M-MACBETH evaluation process for WoG approach

Close modal

Figure 11 illustrates the application of the WoG Evaluation Framework, integrating real-time data and expert assessments to measure effectiveness across the three study variables. Each variable was systematically analyzed, quantified and ranked based on expert perspectives, ensuring a comprehensive and stakeholder-driven evaluation. Leveraging the multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology, specifically M-MACBETH, this process identified key successes and main challenges of the WoG approach, enabling the formulation of actionable recommendations to enhance disaster resilience and develop a stronger, more flexible DM system for future scenarios.

Figure 11

Evaluation framework for the WoG approach in the earthquake response

Figure 11

Evaluation framework for the WoG approach in the earthquake response

Close modal

The earthquake that struck the High Atlas Mountains, spanning a 700-km range, presented unique challenges due to its rugged terrain, vulnerable infrastructure and disrupted transportation routes. Based on the Ministry of the Interior’s regular updates, Figure 12 highlights the extensive impact across Provinces, with a noted increase in fatalities and casualties between September 10 and 12, due to intensified rescue efforts and improved access.

Figure 12

First-week earthquake casualties and fatalities by province

Figure 12

First-week earthquake casualties and fatalities by province

Close modal

In response, Moroccan authorities activated the WoG framework, coordinating military and civilian efforts. This included setting up multiple Command Posts across the three most impacted provinces (Al Haouz, Taroudant and Chichaoua), as depicted in Figure 13, which illustrates the WoG system’s informational, hierarchical and organizational structure.

Figure 13

Diagram of WoG implementation within Al Haouz earthquake response

Figure 13

Diagram of WoG implementation within Al Haouz earthquake response

Close modal

Overall, following data organization and coding, the M-MACBETH evaluation provides an in-depth assessment of each WoG framework element. The results, presented in Figure 14, include a complete ranking of all 27 elements along with their respective Overall Impact Scores, highlighting the top three successes and weaknesses in the DR.

Figure 14

WoG key elements assessment through MACBETH

Figure 14

WoG key elements assessment through MACBETH

Close modal

To maintain clarity and emphasize the most impactful factors, a structured prioritization process was applied. The top 10% of elements were categorized as “Key Successes,” whereas the bottom 10% were designated as “Main Challenges.” Because each element accounts for approximately 3.7% of the total, this threshold includes three elements, representing 11.1% of the total impact. This approach ensures a focused analysis of the most critical factors.  Appendix 5 and  6 provide further insights into the criteria and key aspect assessments.

Table 3 highlights these prioritized elements alongside their overall impact scores as determined by the expert group evaluation. The subsequent subsections succinctly analyze these achievements and challenges, offering a comprehensive depiction of the WoG framework’s performance within Morocco’s DM context.

Table 3

Top three successes and weaknesses from the M-MACBETH WoG evaluation

CategoryWoG elementOverall impact score/100
Key successUse of military aerial assets and advanced technology92.19
Resource deployment and logistics86.78
Political response83.33
Main challengesLocal preparedness and response13.01
Integration of civil-led aid14.02
Media narratives and social media dynamics15.74
Source: Authors’ own work

The adopted WoG framework showcased its real-time adaptability to evolving challenges, exemplified by the coordination of military and civilian units and the spontaneous emergence of self-organizing networks among stakeholders. This highlighted the pivotal roles of diverse entities and the implementation of adaptive strategies, culminating in three key successes.

Indeed, the use of military aerial assets and advanced technology during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake demonstrated the WoG framework’s capacity to manage operational complexity through adaptability and integration. These resources were not deployed as standalone tools but functioned within a dynamic system where their interactions significantly enhanced DR outcomes. As summarized in Table 4, the deployment of cargo aircraft, helicopters and drones highlights Morocco’s ability to effectively leverage military aerial capabilities within a civilian-led WoG framework.

Table 4

Summary of military aerial asset contributions

Military aerial assetNo. of unitsTypeFlight hoursOperational highlights
Cargo aircraft5– C130
– C27J
19Provided logistical support, aerial photography, relocation of teams and equipment transportation
Helicopters10 (Royal Air Forces)– Chinook (CH47D)
– Puma (SA330)
– Bell 205
182Facilitated team coordination, access to isolated areas, evacuation and aid delivery
 10 (Royal Gendarmerie)– Super Puma (H225)217 
Drones3Unavailable information114Enabled real-time information gathering, mapping, infrastructure inspection and risk mitigation
Source: Authors’ own work

These aerial assets aligned military and civilian efforts by providing a shared situational understanding, whereas communication resources, such as the RUDER network, ensured seamless information flow, including coordination with external actors like the Mohammed V Foundation. The system’s adaptability was evident in its recalibration of communication strategies and resource deployment to meet evolving challenges. The activation of RUDER, supplemented by satellite and fiber optic technologies, maintained uninterrupted connectivity even in remote areas. Signals battalions played also a critical role by inspecting and maintaining mission-critical communication systems, demonstrating the framework’s flexibility and capacity to integrate additional resources to address unforeseen complexities.

As shown in Figure 15, military aerial assets and advanced technologies strengthened the WoG framework’s efficiency, fostering real-time coordination, operational agility and strategic resource management.

Figure 15

Role of military aerial assets and technology in enhancing WoG DR

Figure 15

Role of military aerial assets and technology in enhancing WoG DR

Close modal

In addition, the integration of resource deployment and logistics demonstrated the WoG framework’s capacity to address complexity through coordinated efforts by military SAR teams (primarily special forces), civil protection units, field surgical military hospitals and interdepartmental logistical support services, heavily reliant on military capabilities. Operating under a unified command structure, these entities harmonized decentralized, context-specific actions with overarching DM objectives. The WoG framework also engaged effectively with its broader environment, drawing on vital contributions from external actors like the Red Moroccan Crescent and the Mohammed V Foundation. These NGOs complemented governmental efforts, particularly in community engagement and resource mobilization. This interaction-driven approach optimized resource deployment fostered multistakeholder collaboration and enabled dynamic adaptation to evolving disaster conditions.

The WoG deployment (Figure 16) provided crucial relief to Al Haouz and Taroudant provinces via the Marrakech–Agadir axis and to Chichaoua province through the Chichaoua–Imindounit axis. Both axes encountered substantial challenges, including difficult access, predominantly mountainous terrain, and perilous, limited-capacity roads compared to the broader Moroccan road network. The Marrakech–Agadir axis followed the regional route 203 for 176 km, extending to the national route 10 for 136 km, featuring slightly flatter and less mountainous sections. In contrast, the Chichaoua–Imindounit axis, closer to Marrakech, faced complications due to unreliable and poorly maintained roads, specifically the provincial routes 2020 and 2038, covering a distance of 100 km.

Figure 16

Map of WoG deployment network and strategic resource allocation

Figure 16

Map of WoG deployment network and strategic resource allocation

Close modal

Complementing this, Figure 17 illustrates the evacuation process, using both ground and air transport to tailor medical care based on each region’s accessibility challenges, further reinforcing the framework’s operational adaptability.

Figure 17

Map of medical evacuation plan in disaster-stricken provinces

Figure 17

Map of medical evacuation plan in disaster-stricken provinces

Close modal

Figure 18 depicts the interplay between structured governmental responses and the adaptive complexity of Morocco’s response system, showcasing real-time adjustments to evacuation routes, supply chains and aid prioritization. This approach balanced centralized oversight with localized responsiveness, enabling an agile and cohesive WoG response.

Figure 18

Summary of resource deployment and logistics contributions

Figure 18

Summary of resource deployment and logistics contributions

Close modal

Regarding the political response, this element underscores the strategic coordination at the core of the WoG framework. Given the limited engagement – or near-total passivity – of local elected officials and political parties during this critical period, structural vulnerabilities within the governance system became evident. Their minimal participation in response and recovery efforts highlighted an overreliance on centralized mechanisms and underscored the absence of robust institutional frameworks capable of effectively mobilizing local actors.

In this context, three strategic sessions chaired by the King on September 9, 14 and 20 exemplified a centralized governance approach to navigating the crisis. These sessions served as a unifying platform for civilian and military actors, facilitating strategic resource prioritization, rapid aid mobilization and cohesive planning for both immediate relief and sustainable recovery. Such high-level political engagement is indispensable for fostering coherence across interagency and interdepartmental operations, particularly when military capabilities constitute a central component of the response system.

As illustrated in Figure 19, while the centralized response effectively directed immediate relief efforts, it also illuminated the importance of integrated governance in mitigating the impacts of large-scale disasters.

Figure 19

Overview of the political response to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake

Figure 19

Overview of the political response to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake

Close modal

During the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake, the WoG approach highlighted crucial areas for improvement across local preparedness, media narratives and the integration of civil-led aid. Despite the rapid mobilization of national resources, unprepared rural communities, the spread of misinformation and uncoordinated civilian efforts strained the DR.

Regarding local preparedness and response, the lack of policy foresight and insufficient investment in local infrastructure within remote, rural communities, exposed critical vulnerabilities in DR efforts.

Figure 20 highlights the adaptive challenges encountered during the WoG response to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake and their direct impact on DM operations. It underscores the critical need to strengthen local preparedness and response capacities while fostering seamless coordination and adaptability across all levels.

Figure 20

Key challenges facing local response under the WoG framework

Figure 20

Key challenges facing local response under the WoG framework

Close modal

Furthermore, the second main weakness is integration of civil-led aid. While public solidarity demonstrated its strength, it also highlighted significant challenges during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake response. Figure 21 provides a detailed breakdown of the key issues that emerged from uncoordinated civilian efforts, emphasizing the need for more structured collaboration between community-led initiatives and the formal WoG framework.

Figure 21

Challenges in integrating civil-led aid into the WoG framework

Figure 21

Challenges in integrating civil-led aid into the WoG framework

Close modal

Despite efforts from the Mohammed V Foundation for Solidarity to centralize relief efforts through warehouses and depots, the lack of alignment between civil society and national responders led to operational inefficiencies. Unorganized aid efforts created congestion in disaster zones, delaying SAR operations and obstructing resource distribution. The uneven allocation of aid across regions, with some areas receiving excessive supplies and others suffering shortages, further compounded these challenges.

In sum, while civil-led aid is vital in DM, a more cohesive integration strategy is necessary to prevent inefficiencies, optimize resource deployment and ensure seamless coordination among WoG stakeholders and their broader environment, including associations and citizen-led humanitarian convoys.

Finally, the third major weakness lies in media narratives and social media dynamics, which had both constructive and disruptive effects on the WoG response.

Social media not only mobilized relief efforts but also spread misinformation, causing confusion and eroding public trust. National media highlighted DM efforts, whereas international outlets occasionally focused on sensationalism, diverting attention from critical challenges. Local influencers added complexity by spreading conflicting information, making consistent messaging difficult. The Moroccan official press agency’s fact-checking efforts often fell short, as citizens lacked the habit or awareness to access the dedicated section on the agency’s official website. This limited public engagement in verifying information, which allowed misinformation to spread unchecked. The situation underscores the need for a robust, real-time communication strategy to align narratives across platforms, swiftly counter false information and maintain public trust. Figure 22 summarizes the key media-related challenges and their impact on the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake response.

Figure 22

Impacts of media-related dynamics within the WoG framework

Figure 22

Impacts of media-related dynamics within the WoG framework

Close modal

The evaluation of Morocco’s WoG response to the Al Haouz earthquake, analyzed through CAS principles, provides critical insights into the operational strengths and systemic challenges encountered during DM. Feedback Loops, Self-Organization and Adaptability illuminate the intricate dynamics of centralized planning, decentralized execution and stakeholder coordination required to navigate rapidly evolving crises. Although the WoG framework demonstrated agility and responsiveness in addressing immediate needs, systemic vulnerabilities hindered its overall effectiveness.

Our analysis underscores the urgent need to strengthen localized systems to align actions with strategic plans, mitigate vulnerabilities and build long-term resilience. It also highlights the delicate balance required to integrate external actors, such as NGOs, into a cohesive governance framework while maintaining distinct roles and responsibilities.

Table 5 synthesizes these findings under each CAS principle, offering a structured analysis of achievements, challenges and actionable reforms.

Table 5

Evaluation synthesis of Morocco’s WoG response to the Al Haouz earthquake

CAS principleWoG strengthsWoG areas for enhancementProposed reforms
Feedback loops– Real-time recalibration of centralized priorities and resource allocation was facilitated by continuous updates from field units and situational awareness
– Communication networks supported feedback mechanisms, relaying updates to decision-makers and enabling iterative adjustments
– Gaps in local preparedness and inadequate infrastructure disrupted effective feedback mechanisms
– Overreliance on national resources exposed vulnerabilities in local preparedness and capabilities
– Strengthen localized systems by improving infrastructure and providing targeted training for local responders to improve real-time responsiveness
– Institutionalize permanent DM structures, combining centralized leadership with decentralized, region-specific responses for scalability and adaptability
Self-organization– Civilian agencies and military actors autonomously addressed logistical challenges, demonstrating adaptability in balancing centralized directives with decentralized execution
– The Moroccan Red Crescent and the Mohamed V Foundation played a pivotal role in addressing health-care and psychosocial needs, effectively complementing and enhancing the formal WoG framework's efforts
– Fragmented coordination with civil efforts led to inefficiencies, such as road congestion, unsolicited aid and redundant actions
– Limited integration with NGOs and community groups disrupted cohesion in response efforts
– Insufficient oversight of media narratives and the lack of a comprehensive communication strategy involving all media stakeholders, have led to unclear information dissemination, inconsistent public messaging and contributed to misinformation and public distrust
– Establish a National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) supported by Regional Emergency Management Offices (REMOs) to formalize coordination and ensure coherence across all levels of response
– Develop Civil Society Liaison Committees (CSLCs) at regional levels to integrate NGO and community efforts into the broader WoG environment
– Establish national Media Management Units (MMUs) to guide, monitor and support responsible media and content creation, ensuring alignment with WoG priorities and consistent messaging across all levels of government and to the public
Adaptability– Military units dynamically adjusted strategies to maintain operational continuity and highlighted adaptability in addressing shifting priorities
– Flexible resource allocation supported evolving needs, from rescue operations to recovery logistics and rebuilding efforts, driven by proactive political leadership aligned with shifting priorities
– Limited regional capacity and reliance on volunteers strained adaptive responses
– Insufficient mechanisms to align evolving civil contributions with WoG priorities disrupted continuity
– Develop structured training programs to empower local systems and reduce reliance on centralized resources
– Implement adaptive frameworks to align civil efforts with WoG priorities, enhancing responsiveness to evolving crises
Source: Authors’ own work

These reforms aim to embed adaptive governance into operational structures, fostering a DM framework that is both cohesive and resilient, capable of effectively interacting with its broader environment.

In sum, addressing the identified systemic gaps necessitates a shift from a reactive WoG framework to a proactive and inclusive WoS model. By institutionalizing the proposed reforms, Morocco can build a DM system that not only addresses existing vulnerabilities but also embodies a global reference for adaptive governance. This transition offers a viable blueprint for middle-income nations navigating similarly complex crises, balancing centralized leadership with decentralized adaptability to foster resilience and efficiency.

The response to the Al Haouz earthquake underscores the intricate interplay of WoG framework, analyzed through CAS principles. It illustrates how Morocco’s self-reliance in DR serves as both a contextual strength and a critical test of WoG adaptability, offering valuable lessons for similarly situated and constrained nations.

Feedback Loops facilitated real-time recalibration of centralized priorities and resource allocation, enabling iterative adjustments to deployment strategies based on field updates. Self-organization enabled agencies to dynamically adapt to evolving demands, striking a balance between centralized directives and decentralized execution. Adaptability was evident during the transition from SAR operations to recovery, demonstrating the capacity of centralized leadership to guide systemic adjustments in response to evolving needs.

Despite these strengths, systemic gaps disrupted these mechanisms. Weak local preparedness and inadequate infrastructure heightened reliance on national resources, underlining the need for robust localized systems to build resilience. Fragmented coordination with civil efforts resulted in inefficiencies such as road congestion, unsolicited aid and redundancies. In addition, the limited integration of communication strategies challenged public trust and affected operational coherence.

To address these challenges, the study advocates transitioning from a WoG to an inclusive WoS framework rooted in CAS principles, proposing reforms to embed adaptive governance into operational structures. By institutionalizing these reforms, Morocco’s DM system – and those in similar middle-income, resource-constrained contexts – can effectively address systemic vulnerabilities while enhancing efficiency and inclusivity.

The study bridges the WoG approach with CAS theory, offering refined insights into DM frameworks by analyzing Morocco’s response to the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake. It demonstrates how centralized decision-making integrates with decentralized execution, advancing WoG models to reflect dynamic and adaptive governance. By operationalizing CAS principles – Feedback Loops, Self-Organization and Adaptability – within the WoG framework, the study aligns these principles with operational effectiveness, stakeholder coordination and adaptability and flexibility. This alignment enhances theoretical models, providing a nuanced lens to evaluate the interplay of governance and logistics in complex DR systems, aligning with Ortenzi et al. (2022) and Altay et al. (2024) on adaptive governance and systems-thinking in fostering disaster resilience.

Extending CAS theory to middle-income contexts, the study emphasizes adaptive governance and selective self-reliance in resource-constrained settings. It illustrates how CAS principles drive iterative learning, emergent collaboration and strategic recalibration during evolving crises, resonating with Comfort (2007) and Heaslip et al. (2019) on leadership and logistical agility. By incorporating external actors like NGOs and civil society into systemic interactions, the study advances WoG theory and highlights the need for permanent DM structures with specialized expertise. These findings enrich CAS and WoG frameworks, offering actionable insights for building resilience and responsiveness under socioeconomic constraints, furthering contributions by Besiou et al. (2021) and McEntire (2023).

Methodologically, the integration of M-MACBETH and CAS principles introduces an innovative dual-method approach to DM evaluation. By combining quantitative MCDM with qualitative CAS insights, the study ensures analytical rigor while addressing the complexities of resource-constrained environments. These methodological advancements refine the understanding of WoG dynamics and CAS theory in DM, offering practical frameworks for improving DR in middle-income countries like Morocco.

Practically, the findings advocate for institutional reforms, including the establishment of a National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) to strengthen multisectoral collaboration and operational resilience. The study also underscores the importance of aligning short-term humanitarian actions with long-term sustainable goals, echoing Besiou et al. (2018, 2021) and Tatham et al. (2017), who champion frameworks like the Humanitarian Common Logistics Operating Picture for streamlined operations. In addition, the proposed media management units (MMU) highlights the critical role of structured communication in fostering public trust and transparency, as emphasized by Lindell and Prater (2003) and Krishnappa et al. (2024).

In sum, this study uniquely explores CAS and WoG frameworks in Morocco, a middle-income country addressing DM challenges with limited international aid. Bridging theory and practice, it highlights the frameworks’ scalability and adaptability to socioeconomic constraints. By focusing on real-world governance under resource limitations, the research enriches CAS and WoG theory, offering actionable insights for fostering resilient DM systems and informing policymakers in similar contexts.

To address the gaps identified in Morocco’s WoG framework during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake, we propose a multifaceted roadmap grounded in CAS principles (Table 6). This strategy fosters resilience by embedding robust feedback loops, promoting decentralized self-organization and enhancing adaptive capacity across the DM system.

Table 6

Proposed roadmap for strengthening Morocco’s WoG framework in DM

Key proposalsImplementation stepsOperationalizationPilot best practices
Establishment of NEMARecruit experts in logistics, emergency response and humanitarian operationsPartner with organizations like UNISDR and the Red Cross for capacity buildingTurkey: The Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) coordinates DR through regional offices and maintains a national disaster database for risk assessment and early warning
Launch a pilot in high-risk regions with REMOs under NEMA’s supervisionTest coordination among local authorities, military, civil protection and NGOs
Investment in disaster simulation softwareDevelop or adopt scenario-based simulation toolsTrain responders through scenario-based crisis simulationsJapan: Crisis management simulation software for disaster preparedness
Decentralization of local responsesFormation of Prefectoral Emergency Management Committees (PEMCs)Establish PEMCs with defined roles and responsibilitiesIndonesia: Village Resilience Program (Desa Tangguh Bencana) trains villages for DR
Training and resourcesProvide regular training sessions, emergency kits, communication tools and temporary shelter materialsNew Zealand: Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) works with communities and universities to strengthen disaster readiness
Collaborate with universities and civil protection agencies for resources and expertise
Integration of civil society and NGOsEstablish a Civil Society Liaison Unit (CSLU) within NEMA and a CSLC within each REMO to integrate NGO efforts as well as civil-led aid into the formal WoG approachCreate a digital platform to track needs, register resources and streamline aid distributionPhilippines: National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council dashboard facilitates real-time coordination between the government and civil society
Enhancement of communication and media managementEstablish an MMU within NEMA to monitor misinformation and provide real-time updates. Furthermore, create a Media Management Committee (MMC) within each REMO to facilitate media coverage on the ground during crisesPartner with the Moroccan official press agency (MAP) for regular communication updatesIndia: Mobile alerts and legal frameworks under the IT Act help control misinformation and ensure public communication
Establish early warning systems integrated with mobile networksPartner with social media platforms to provide verified updatesAustralia: Partnerships with Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp ensure reliable disaster information
Source: Authors’ own work

Our roadmap emphasizes interagency cooperation and optimized resource allocation to ensure resilience in complex, multilayered disaster scenarios. It lays the foundation for a more agile and cohesive DR system, improving Morocco’s ability to respond to future crises.

Besides, Figure 23 presents the proposed organizational structure for Morocco’s emergency management system, with NEMA overseeing operations across 12 regions. This structure establishes a clear chain of command and fosters multistakeholder collaboration, balancing centralized leadership with regional autonomy to ensure smooth coordination at all levels. However, the framework faces potential barriers, such as bureaucratic resistance within existing government structures, which may delay its integration into the current DR framework. In addition, insufficient funding and resources could limit operational capacity amid competing national priorities and communities may resist initiatives perceived as undermining their autonomy.

Figure 23

Proposed Morocco WoG DM framework organizational chart

Figure 23

Proposed Morocco WoG DM framework organizational chart

Close modal

A phased implementation approach is recommended to overcome these challenges, involving community consultations and pilot programs to foster local ownership. Figure 24 outlines the phased strategy for Regional Emergency Management Offices (REMOs), focusing on iterative testing and strategic adjustments.

Figure 24

Proposed implementation strategy for Morocco’s WoG approach to DM

Figure 24

Proposed implementation strategy for Morocco’s WoG approach to DM

Close modal

Ultimately, launching such pilot programs, starting from high-risk regions, will help identify potential bottlenecks early, enabling targeted improvements and enhancing stakeholder coordination. This gradual approach will ensure effective REMO expansion, increasing preparedness and resilience in Morocco and similar countries seeking to strengthen their DM strategies.

This study offers valuable insights into the operationalization of Morocco’s WoG approach during the 2023 Al Haouz earthquake, presenting lessons with global relevance for DM. By applying CAS theory, the research illustrates how adaptive frameworks like WoG effectively respond to large-scale crises. Feedback loops, self-organization and adaptability facilitated rapid adjustments to evolving challenges, validating key CAS principles.

The findings highlight notable successes, particularly the seamless interagency deployment supported by strong military contributions and orchestrated through decisive political leadership. However, the study also exposes the limitations of centralized coordination, especially in resource-constrained environments, where flexibility and local responsiveness are essential. It emphasizes the need for more resilient preparedness strategies, inclusive frameworks and adaptive communication and media management to confront future crises.

A key takeaway is the importance of balancing centralized authority with decentralized, community-driven initiatives to foster adaptability and resilience. Combining national leadership with local engagement, this hybrid model holds particular relevance for similar contexts across Africa, Asia and Latin America. Further research on WoG frameworks across diverse governance models and disaster types is crucial, with comparative studies offering essential lessons to enhance global disaster preparedness.

Ultimately, advancing toward a WoS approach will be pivotal for achieving sustainable DM by reinforcing regional and local preparedness, promoting active community participation, enhancing civil society integration and implementing a robust communication strategy with improved media engagement. By bridging theory and practice, we hope this real-time evaluation meaningfully contributes to the development of a more conceptually coherent and empirically grounded DM framework, tailored to the specific needs of Morocco and other middle-income countries facing similar disaster risks, socioeconomic vulnerabilities and infrastructural challenges.

The authors extend their gratitude to the expert group who participated in this project and all respondents who agreed to be interviewed, particularly during the rush of earthquake management efforts.

‘t Hart
,
P.
and
Tummers
,
L.
(
2014
),
Understanding Public Leadership
,
Palgrave Macmillan
,
London
.
Altay
,
N.
,
Kovács
,
G.
and
Spens
,
K.
(
2021
), “
The evolution of humanitarian logistics as a discipline through a crystal ball
”,
Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management
, Vol.
11
No.
4
, pp.
577
-
584
.
Altay
,
N.
,
Heaslip
,
G.
,
Kovács
,
G.
,
Spens
,
K.
,
Tatham
,
P.
and
Vaillancourt
,
A.
(
2024
), “
Innovation in humanitarian logistics and supply chain management: a systematic review
”,
Annals of Operations Research
, Vol.
335
No.
3
, pp.
965
-
987
.
Bana e Costa
,
C.A.
,
De Corte
,
J.M.
and
Vansnick
,
J.C.
(
2016
),
On the Mathematical Foundations of MACBETH
,
Springer New York, NY
, pp.
421
-
463
.
Besiou
,
M.
,
Pedraza-Martinez
,
A.J.
and
Van Wassenhove
,
L.N.
(
2018
), “
Or applied to humanitarian operations
”,
European Journal of Operational Research
, Vol.
269
No.
2
, pp.
397
-
405
.
Besiou
,
M.
,
Pedraza‐Martinez
,
A.J.
and
Van Wassenhove
,
L.N.
(
2021
), “
Humanitarian operations and the UN sustainable development goals
”,
Production and Operations Management
, Vol.
30
No.
12
, pp.
4343
-
4355
.
Boin
,
A.
,
Stern
,
E.
and
Sundelius
,
B.
(
2016
),
The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure
,
Cambridge University Press
.
Burk
,
J.
(
2002
), “
Theories of democratic civil-military relations
”,
Armed Forces & Society
, Vol.
29
No.
1
, pp.
7
-
29
.
Burris
,
S.
and
Terry
,
N.
(
2023
), “
Whole-of-government
”,
Society and Person. Society and Person
(December 1, 2023).
Coetzee
,
C.
,
Van Niekerk
,
D.
and
Raju
,
E.
(
2016
), “
Disaster resilience and complex adaptive systems theory: finding common grounds for risk reduction
”,
Disaster Prevention and Management
, Vol.
25
No.
2
, pp.
196
-
211
.
Comfort
,
L.K.
(
1994
), “
Self-organization in complex systems
”,
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART
, Vol.
4
No.
3
, pp.
393
-
410
.
Comfort
,
L.K.
(
2007
), “
Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control
”,
Public Administration Review
, Vol.
67
No.
s1
, pp.
189
-
197
.
Guo
,
X.
,
Kapucu
,
N.
and
Huang
,
J.
(
2021
), “
Examining resilience of disaster response system in response to covid-19
”,
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
, Vol.
59
, p.
102239
.
Haraguchi
,
M.
(
2020
), “
How can a municipal government continue operations during megadisasters? An analysis of preparedness using complex adaptive systems
”,
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal
, Vol.
29
No.
5
, pp.
779
-
792
.
Heaslip
,
G.
,
Vaillancourt
,
A.
,
Tatham
,
P.
,
Kovács
,
G.
,
Blackman
,
D.
and
Henry
,
M.C.
(
2019
), “
Supply chain and logistics competencies in humanitarian aid
”,
Disasters
, Vol.
43
No.
3
, pp.
686
-
708
.
Holland
,
J.H.
(
2000
),
Emergence: From Chaos to Order
,
OUP Oxford
.
Holling
,
C.S.
(
1973
), “
Resilience and stability of ecological systems
”.
Hollnagel
,
E.
(
2015
), “
Disaster management, control, and resilience
”,
Disaster Management: Enabling Resilience
, pp.
21
-
36
.
Hong
,
S.Y.
and
Lim
,
J.H.
(
2023
), “
Why is success of South Korea’s covid-19 response fading?
”,
International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services
, Vol.
53
No.
3
, pp.
323
-
330
.
Huntington
,
S.P.
(
1981
),
The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations
,
Harvard University Press
.
Ivčević
,
A.
,
Mazurek
,
H.
,
Siame
,
L.
,
Bertoldo
,
R.
,
Statzu
,
V.
,
Agharroud
,
K.
and
Bellier
,
O.
(
2021
), “
The importance of raising risk awareness: lessons learned about risk awareness sessions from the Mediterranean region
”,
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
, Vol.
21
No.
12
, pp.
3749
-
3765
.
Janowitz
,
M.
(
2017
),
The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait
,
Simon and Schuster
.
Kapucu
,
N.
and
Garayev
,
V.
(
2016
), “
Structure and network performance: horizontal and vertical networks in emergency management
”,
Administration & Society
, Vol.
48
No.
8
, pp.
931
-
961
.
Kjellén
,
M.
,
Wong
,
C.
,
van Koppen
,
B.
,
Uprety
,
L.
,
Mukuyu
,
P.
,
Avidar
,
O.
, … and
Saleh
,
A.
(
2023
),
Governance: A ‘Whole-of-Society’ approach
,
IWMI
.
Kovács
,
G.
,
Spens
,
K.
and
Moshtari
,
M.
(Eds) (
2018
),
The Palgrave Handbook of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management
,
Springer
.
Krishnappa
,
N.
,
Saraswathi
,
D.
and
Chelliah
,
C.
(
2024
), “
Exhaustive insights towards social-media driven disaster management approaches
”,
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications
, Vol.
15
No.
5
.
Kunz
,
N.
,
Van Wassenhove
,
L.N.
,
Besiou
,
M.
,
Hambye
,
C.
and
Kovács
,
G.
(
2017
), “
Relevance of humanitarian logistics research: best practices and way forward
”,
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
, Vol.
37
No.
11
.
Lindell
,
K.
and
Prater
,
S.
(
2003
), “
Assessing community impacts of natural disasters
”,
Natural Hazards Review
, Vol.
4
No.
4
, pp.
176
-
185
.
McConnell
,
A.
(
2011
), “
Success? Failure? Something in-between? A framework for evaluating crisis management
”,
Policy and Society
, Vol.
30
No.
2
, pp.
63
-
76
.
McEntire
,
D.A.
(Ed.) (
2023
),
The Distributed Functions of Emergency Management and Homeland Security: An Assessment of Professions Involved in Response to Disasters and Terrorist Attacks
,
CRC Press
.
Moravcsik
,
A.
(
2013
),
The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht
,
Routledge
.
Ortenzi
,
F.
,
Marten
,
R.
,
Valentine
,
N.B.
,
Kwamie
,
A.
and
Rasanathan
,
K.
(
2022
), “
Whole of government and whole of society approaches: call for further research to improve population health and health equity
”,
BMJ Global Health
, Vol.
7
No.
7
, p.
e009972
.
Ostrom
,
E.
(
1990
),
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
,
Cambridge university press
.
Piraina
,
M.
and
Trucco
,
P.
(
2022
), “
Emergency management capabilities of interdependent systems
”,
Environment Systems and Decisions
, Vol.
42
No.
2
, pp.
149
-
176
.
Rath
,
L.L.
(
2016
), “
Low-barrier-to-entry data tools: creating and sharing humanities data
”,
Library Hi Tech
, Vol.
34
No.
2
, pp.
268
-
285
.
Sadeghi
,
J.K.
,
Struckell
,
E.
,
Ojha
,
D.
and
Nowicki
,
D.
(
2021
), “
Absorptive capacity and disaster immunity: the mediating role of information quality and change management capability
”,
Journal of Knowledge Management
, Vol.
25
No.
4
, pp.
714
-
742
.
Schiffling
,
S.
,
Hannibal
,
C.
,
Tickle
,
M.
and
Fan
,
Y.
(
2022
), “
The implications of complexity for humanitarian logistics: a complex adaptive systems perspective
”,
Annals of Operations Research
, Vol.
319
No.
1
, pp.
1379
-
1410
.
Shergold
,
P.
(
2004
), “
Connecting government: whole of government responses to Australia’s priority challenges.[launching speech made on 20 April 2004]
”,
Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration
, No.
112
, pp.
11
-
14
.
Shi
,
Y.
,
Zhai
,
G.
,
Xu
,
L.
,
Zhou
,
S.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Liu
,
H.
and
Huang
,
W.
(
2021
), “
Assessment methods of urban system resilience: from the perspective of complex adaptive system theory
”,
Cities
, Vol.
112
, p.
103141
.
Tatham
,
P.
,
Spens
,
K.
and
Kovács
,
G.
(
2017
), “
The humanitarian common logistic operating picture: a solution to the inter‐agency coordination challenge
”,
Disasters
, Vol.
41
No.
1
, pp.
77
-
100
.
Tierney
,
K.
(
2019
),
Disasters: A Sociological Approach
,
John Wiley & Sons
.
Vega
,
D.
(
2018
), “
Case studies in humanitarian logistics research
”,
Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management
, Vol.
8
No.
2
, pp.
134
-
152
.
Waugh
,
W.L.
, Jr.
and
Streib
,
G.
(
2006
), “
Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management
”,
Public Administration Review
, Vol.
66
No.
s1
, pp.
131
-
140
.
Wu
,
G.
,
Hu
,
Z.
,
Wang
,
H.
and
Liu
,
B.
(
2024
), “
Adding sectors or strengthening ties? Adaptive strategies for cross-sector collaboration in disaster governance
”,
Public Management Review
, pp.
1
-
23
.
Zhang
,
H.
,
Zhang
,
X.
,
Comfort
,
L.
and
Chen
,
M.
(
2016
), “
The emergence of an adaptive response network: the Lushan, China earthquake
”,
Safety Science
, Vol.
90
, pp.
14
-
23
.
Aoki
,
N.
,
Tay
,
M.
and
Rawat
,
S.
(
2024
), “
Whole‐of‐government and joined‐up government: a systematic literature review
”,
Public Administration
, Vol.
102
No.
2
, pp.
733
-
752
.
Balcik
,
B.
,
Beamon
,
B.M.
,
Krejci
,
C.C.
,
Muramatsu
,
K.M.
and
Ramirez
,
M.
(
2010
), “
Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities
”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol.
126
No.
1
, pp.
22
-
34
.
Boin
,
A.
and
't Hart
,
P.
(
2010
), “
Organising for effective emergency management: lessons from research 1
”,
Australian Journal of Public Administration
, Vol.
69
No.
4
, pp.
357
-
371
.
Cozzolino
,
A.
(
2012
),
Humanitarian Logistics: cross-Sector Cooperation in Disaster Relief Management
,
Springer Publisher
.
Van Wassenhove
,
L.N.
(
2006
), “
Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear
”,
Journal of the Operational Research Society
, Vol.
57
No.
5
, pp.
475
-
489
.

Table A1 

Table A1

Questionnaire for evaluating WoG approach in Al Haouz earthquake management

Question no.Question
1How do you assess the effectiveness of civil–military collaboration in earthquake management? Any specific examples?
2How would you rate the quality of communication and coordination among different entities involved (NGOs, local authorities, military, etc.)? Any encountered obstacles?
3How were resources allocated and managed within the DR framework? Did you observe any gaps or excesses in resources?
4What impact did the DR efforts have on local communities? Any aspects that could be improved?
5How were popular humanitarian aids from associations and civil society integrated into the DR efforts? What were the benefits and challenges?
6What is your overall perception of the DR, and can you share any significant personal experiences related to this response?
7How did you receive information about the DR? Which channels were most effective?
8What role did traditional and social media play? Any examples of their positive or negative impact?
9How were information and rumors managed during the crisis? Any instances where traditional or social media influenced the situation?
10Did you use traditional or social media to obtain or share information about the DR? What were your experiences?
11What are the main challenges and opportunities you identified within the DR framework?
12What improvement strategies would you recommend to enhance the effectiveness of DR framework?
Source: Authors’ own work

Figure A1 

Figure A1

Selected expert group panels with profiles

Figure A1

Selected expert group panels with profiles

Close modal

Table A2 

Table A2

Selected expert group panels with profiles

Panels of expert groupNo. of participantsRanksGenderAgeProfessional experienceLevel of education
Military staff03Senior officersMale40–52 YOOver 18 yearsMilitary academy degrees, supplemented by higher education in strategic studies
Civil protection staff03Senior officersMale48 YO26 yearsCivil protection academy degrees, supplemented by bachelor’s degrees (BD) in public safety
38 YO15 years
30 YO12 years
Medical staff02Senior positionFemale58 YO27 yearsMedical degree, complemented by a master's degree (MD) in public health
Male51 YO19 yearsMedical degree, complemented by specialization in emergency medicine
Local officials02Decision-makersFemale39 YO15 yearsMD in public administration, with additional qualification in community development
Male32 YO9 yearsMD in political science
Local representatives02Decision-makersMale43 YO10 yearsMD in political science
Female37 YO8 yearsBD in law
National NGOs staff02Representative membersFemale31 YO10 yearsMD in development studies
Male25 YO6 yearsBD in social sciences
Civil society staff02Representative membersFemale43 YO13 yearsMD in public administration
28 YO5 yearsMD in sociology
Humanitarian volunteers02Intermediate to advancedFemale36 YO15 yearsBD in social work
Male27 YO5 yearsAutomotive industrial engineering specialist
RG, National Police and Auxiliary Forces Staff03Senior officersMale45 YO20 yearsDegree from Police Academy with further education in law
41 YO19 yearsMilitary Academy degree, supplemented by BD in law
37 YO16 yearsMilitary Academy degree, supplemented by higher education from Gendarme College, and BD in international relations
Source: Authors’ own work

Figure A2 

Figure A2

Overview of data clustering within elements and related key aspects

Figure A2

Overview of data clustering within elements and related key aspects

Close modal

Figure A3 

Figure A3

WoG criteria assessment through MACBETH

Figure A3

WoG criteria assessment through MACBETH

Close modal

Figure A4 

Figure A4

WoG key aspects assessment through MACBETH

Figure A4

WoG key aspects assessment through MACBETH

Close modal
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licenceLink to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal