A series of consultations between patients treated surgically for colorectal cancer and their hospital consultants were examined to establish the main focus of the consultation at various stages in the post‐surgical period. The results showed that follow‐up consultations were predominantly doctor driven. Patients interviewed less than 12 months since the time of surgery (short‐term group) were more likely to receive a longer consultation with a significantly higher number of verbal interactions (questions, responses) than patients more than 12 months since surgery at the time of interview (long‐term group). Furthermore, patients in the short‐term group played a greater participatory role within consultations than patients in the long‐term group. The predominant focus throughout all consultations was biomedical, with little attention afforded to patients’ expressions of post‐operative anxiety. At present, it appears that out‐patient consultations play a minimal role in either detecting or addressing psychosocial morbidity amongst colorectal cancer patients in the post‐surgical period.
Article navigation
1 June 1999
This article was originally published in
Journal of Management in Medicine
Research Article|
June 01 1999
Focus of doctor‐patient communication in follow‐up consultations for patients treated surgically for colorectal cancer
Judith McCool;
Judith McCool
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and
Search for other works by this author on:
Jenny Morris
Jenny Morris
Institute of Health Studies, University of Plymouth, Pool, Cornwall, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7441
Print ISSN: 0268-9235
© MCB UP Limited
1999
J Manag Med (1999) 13 (3): 169–177.
Citation
McCool J, Morris J (1999), "Focus of doctor‐patient communication in follow‐up consultations for patients treated surgically for colorectal cancer". J Manag Med, Vol. 13 No. 3 pp. 169–177, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02689239910292062
Download citation file:
219
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Determining priorities for purchasers: The public response to rationing within the NHS
J Manag Med (August,1997)
Handbook of Communication and Emotion: : Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts
Reference Reviews (March,1998)
Gatekeeping: a challenge in the management of primary care physicians
J Manag Med (August,2001)
The “doctor‐customer” relationship: Hippocrates in the modern marketplace
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (February,2002)
Who really wants health‐care choice?
J Manag Med (December,2000)
Related Chapters
Transforming Professional Bureaucracies in Hospitals and Higher Education Institutions
Towards A Comparative Institutionalism: Forms, Dynamics And Logics Across The Organizational Fields Of Health Care And Higher Education
Can Care and Cure Coexist in Age of Internet Influenced Healthcare? Psychological Androgyny and Interpersonal Competence in Indian Doctors
Emotions and Service in the Digital Age
By what Means are Medical Professionals Able to Reject Hostile Environment Policy within the NHS?
Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
