What is the effect of slavery on long-run party system development in the Americas? Recent research has examined these issues in the United States by focusing on contemporary white attitudes. However, relatively little research has considered the comparative generalizability of this agenda. In this article, we explore the impact of the intensity of slavery on political behavior in Colombia, a relatively stable democracy during the 20th century, with a de facto two-party system. We find that places where enslaved Africans were a larger proportion of the population in 1843 show higher levels of support for the Liberal Party. These results are robust to different specifications and strategies to identify the effect of slavery and are consistent across a different set of elections that span the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries. We further explore and test two mechanisms related to the strength of the colonial state and the development of a party stronghold in areas with slavery. To complement the argument, we explore the contemporary partisan alliances of different ethnic groups in Colombia and show that the initial affiliation between liberals and black communities remained stable over time.
Slavery, Elections and Political Affiliations in Colombia
We thank the editor-in-chief (Jeffrey A. Jenkins), the editorial team, and referees for suggestions that improved the paper significantly. We are also grateful for the guidance provided by Pablo Querubín, Cyrus Samii, and David Stasavage. We received comments and suggestions from Antonella Bandiera, and from audiences at NYU, Temple University, University of Tennessee, Knoxville and MPSA.We thank Camilo Garcia-Jimeno for sharing historical data with us. We are especially grateful to Leticia Arroyo Abad and participants at the 2021 Political Institutions and Political Economy (PIPE) Symposium on “Slavery and its Legacies” for their excellent comments. All errors are our own.
Ahmed AT, Johnson M, Vásquez-Cortés M (2021), "Slavery, Elections and Political Affiliations in Colombia". Journal of Historical Political Economy, Vol. 1 No. 3 pp. 283–318, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/115.00000011
Download citation file:
