This study explores the main factors considered when shippers and container shipping lines select their import/export and transshipment ports. In the present study, 38 container port selection indices were chosen from the previous research and field interviews. The scores of the 38 items were collected via survey to the three major maritime/port market players: shippers, shipping lines, and container terminal operators. In order to analyze the different priorities imposed on the port selection factors by the three market players, the ANOVA method has been employed. The empirical test shows the different perceptions about port selection attributes among service suppliers and demanders. In addition, the 38 items have been categorized into seven key factors through an exploratory factor analysis. The ANOVA technique was employed again to analyze the perspective differences for the port selection factors among the market players. The results show that there are significant differences among the players assessing the importance of the three port choice factors: liners and terminal operators give more weight to ‘hinterland and terminal basic conditions’ than shippers; terminal operators do not take ‘line operation’ as seriously as carriers and shippers; the factor of ‘terminal operation’ is more significantly considered by liners and terminal operators than by shippers.
Article navigation
31 December 2010
Research Article|
December 31 2010
Container port selection factors: heterogeneity among major market players
Sang-Yoon Lee;
Sang-Yoon Lee
*
1
Graduate School of Logistics Inha University Incheon
, Korea
*Corresponding Author: Associate Professor, Graduate School of Logistics Inha University Incheon, Korea. Fax: 82-32-860-8236 E-mail: sylee@inha.ac.kr
Search for other works by this author on:
Young-Tae Chang;
Young-Tae Chang
1
Graduate School of Logistics Inha University Incheon
, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Tae-Woo Lee
Paul Tae-Woo Lee
2
Department of Logistics and Shipping Management Kainan University
, Taiwan
Search for other works by this author on:
*Corresponding Author: Associate Professor, Graduate School of Logistics Inha University Incheon, Korea. Fax: 82-32-860-8236 E-mail: sylee@inha.ac.kr
Publisher: Emerald Publishing on behalf of Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
Received:
October 04 2010
Revision Received:
October 13 2010
Accepted:
October 13 2010
Online ISSN: 2508-7592
Print ISSN: 1738-2122
© 2010 Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
2010
Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Journal of International Logistics and Trade (2010) 8 (2): 73–90.
Article history
Received:
October 04 2010
Revision Received:
October 13 2010
Accepted:
October 13 2010
Citation
Lee S, Chang Y, Lee PT (2010), "Container port selection factors: heterogeneity among major market players". Journal of International Logistics and Trade, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 73–90, doi: https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2010.8.2.73
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
A longitudinal study of seaport selection: the perspective of container shipping companies
Maritime Business Review (September,2023)
Overview of interport competition: Issues and methods
Journal of International Logistics and Trade (June,2007)
Towards more efficient logistics: increasing load factor in a shipper’s road transport
The International Journal of Logistics Management (May,2017)
Internal coordination to enable high load factor
The International Journal of Logistics Management (November,2017)
Innovators and transformers: Revisiting the gap between academia and practice: insights from the green logistics phenomenon
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management (July,2024)
Related Chapters
Behavioral Red Flags and Loss Sizes from Asset Misappropriation: Evidence from the US
Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research
Forecasting Pain and Discomfort for Canines with Disease for Establishing Appropriate Medication Levels
Advances in Business and Management Forecasting
Forecasting Treatment Outcomes for the Futures Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Center
Advances in Business and Management Forecasting
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
