In this paper, we examine the comparative advantage of Korea and China while focusing on their technology level. The three digit SITC (Standard International Trade Classification) data is classified by technology level and the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) is derived from 1992-2009 by using UN COMTRADE data. For careful interpretation of the comparative advantage and technology levels, we also examined intra-industry trade and unit values of bilateral Korea-China trade, and semi-conductor industry technology. We found that the revealed comparative advantage has moved from low technology products to high technology products in Korea. China still maintains a comparative advantage in low technology products such as textiles and clothing, but at the same time, China’s high and medium-high technology products have recently gained a comparative advantage. The perception that China only has a comparative advantage for labor intensive products with low technology should be changed based on our analysis. However, China’s advancement in technology should not be overestimated. When comparing the unit value of basic materials of Korea’s and China’s exports, we found that Korea’s export product prices are on average higher than that of China’s, although the gap is reducing. A wider technology gap between Korea and China still exists in the semi-conductor industry, which is one of the most advanced high technology industries throughout the world.
Article navigation
31 December 2011
Research Article|
December 31 2011
Comparison of Comparative Advantage of Korea and China by Technology Level
Jung Taik Hyun;
Jung Taik Hyun
1
Department of International Trade, Inha University
, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Jin Young Hong
Jin Young Hong
2
Research Fellow, Jung seok Research Institute
, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing on behalf of Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
Received:
November 15 2011
Revision Received:
November 25 2011
Accepted:
November 25 2011
Online ISSN: 2508-7592
Print ISSN: 1738-2122
© 2011 Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
2011
Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Journal of International Logistics and Trade (2011) 9 (2): 119–148.
Article history
Received:
November 15 2011
Revision Received:
November 25 2011
Accepted:
November 25 2011
Citation
Hyun JT, Hong JY (2011), "Comparison of Comparative Advantage of Korea and China by Technology Level". Journal of International Logistics and Trade, Vol. 9 No. 2 pp. 119–148, doi: https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2011.9.2.119
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Exploring Egypt‐China bilateral trade: dynamics and prospects
Journal of Economic Studies (July,2012)
Regional and global production networks: the case of China
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies (October,2014)
Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade in Korea: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Journal of International Logistics and Trade (April,2018)
A Study on the Characteristics of Intra-Industry Trade for Korea’s E-Commerce Trade
Journal of International Logistics and Trade (March,2020)
Economic impact of the Canadian co-operative sector (2009 and 2010)
International Journal of Social Economics (May,2017)
Related Chapters
Chapter 2 Do Factor Endowments Matter for North–North Trade?
Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Trade Theory and Policy
Brands in International Trade Theory
Multidisciplinary Insights from New AIB Fellows
Chapter 3 Comparative Advantage and Trade Liberalization in a Chamberlinian–Ricardian Model
Globalization and Emerging Issues in Trade Theory and Policy
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
