The aim of this paper is to show current position of domestic airports and provide an improvement scheme through the comparative analysis of efficiency and social efficiency. We used SBM (Slack Based Measure) for efficiency and undesirable output model that is extended from SBM for social efficiency. In addition, window analysis is used for analyzing the trend of the values. For the scope of this study, we analyzed fourteen airports in Korea from 2004 to 2009. In the models, we considered the length of runway, the number of employees and terminal area as input factors, and the number of passengers, the amount of cargo and the number of flights as desirable outputs and directly controllable CO2 emissions from airports as undesirable output. The results show that all of the efficiencies are higher than the social efficiencies and both of them are decreasing by years. To improve social efficiency in 2009, the average amounts of reduced CO2 emissions which account for 48.3% of the total emissions are required.
Article navigation
31 December 2011
Research Article|
December 31 2011
Social efficiency benchmarking of transport infrastructure with non-radial approach: focusing on airports
Hun-Koo Ha;
Hun-Koo Ha
*
1
Asia-Pacific School of Logistics, Inha University
*Corresponding Author: Professor, Asia-Pacific School of Logistics, Inha University, email: hkha@inha.ac.kr
Search for other works by this author on:
Young-In Jeon;
Young-In Jeon
2
Graduate School of Logistics, Inha University
Search for other works by this author on:
Kyung-Chang Min
Kyung-Chang Min
2
Graduate School of Logistics, Inha University
Search for other works by this author on:
*Corresponding Author: Professor, Asia-Pacific School of Logistics, Inha University, email: hkha@inha.ac.kr
Publisher: Emerald Publishing on behalf of Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
Received:
May 21 2011
Revision Received:
July 15 2011
Accepted:
July 15 2011
Online ISSN: 2508-7592
Print ISSN: 1738-2122
© 2011 Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
2011
Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Journal of International Logistics and Trade (2011) 9 (2): 149–160.
Article history
Received:
May 21 2011
Revision Received:
July 15 2011
Accepted:
July 15 2011
Citation
Ha H, Jeon Y, Min K (2011), "Social efficiency benchmarking of transport infrastructure with non-radial approach: focusing on airports". Journal of International Logistics and Trade, Vol. 9 No. 2 pp. 149–160, doi: https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2011.9.2.149
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Does bank regulation and supervision impedes the efficiency of microfinance institutions to eradicate poverty? Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries
Studies in Economics and Finance (June,2020)
Validity of generalized compensation contract for PPP project with consideration of private fair reference depending on concession profit
China Finance Review International (January,2018)
Amending CSV: contingency theory for the quest of fit
Social Responsibility Journal (September,2025)
Financial inclusion and the performance of microfinance institutions: does social performance affect the efficiency of microfinance institutions?
Social Responsibility Journal (June,2021)
Heathrow Terminal 5: health and safety leadership
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2008)
Related Chapters
Introduction
Inside London's Airports Policy: Indecision, decision and counter-decision
A brief overview of air-transport history
Inside London's Airports Policy: Indecision, decision and counter-decision
Airports policy up to the 1974 Maplin Review
Inside London's Airports Policy: Indecision, decision and counter-decision
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
