Purpose

Urban centers in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) face a distinct “human bottleneck” hindering sustainable last-mile delivery (SLMD), despite rapid technological advancements. This study aims to explore behavioral drivers – including consumer habits, courier motivations and cultural norms – that critically influence SLMD success, shifting focus from technology to human decision-making.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic literature review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines analyzed 56 peer-reviewed studies from 2016 to 2025. Combining bibliometric mapping with thematic coding, the study integrates behavioral psychology, sustainability metrics and MENA-specific logistical challenges.

Findings

The analysis reveals a persistent “intention-behavior gap,” where stakeholder support for sustainability is undermined by economic constraints and perceived risks. Technological innovations like artificial intelligence (AI) routing and electric fleets are necessary but insufficient alone, as fragmented governance and diverse socio-cultural expectations slow progress. Technology currently operates in a behavioral vacuum, neglecting local context.

Research limitations/implications

Future studies should move beyond descriptive accounts by employing revealed preference data, longitudinal designs and mixed-methods approaches to validate behavioral determinants. Particular attention should be given to socio-cultural moderators – such as trust, gender norms and informal networks – that shape adoption in MENA contexts. Expanding comparative research across regions will also clarify the generalizability of the hybrid SLMD framework and strengthen its theoretical contribution to urban mobility transitions.

Practical implications

Logistics providers and policymakers must pair technical upgrades with human-centered strategies, adopting culturally tailored incentives over generic models. Urban planners should incorporate behavioral insights as core infrastructure alongside physical assets to build resilient smart cities.

Originality/value

Challenging the dominant “tech-first” narrative, this research foregrounds behavioral determinants as key levers for SLMD in the MENA region. While existing studies often focus on algorithmic efficiency, this paper introduces a hybrid SLMD framework that bridges behavioral science, urban planning and logistics innovation, offering a culturally grounded roadmap tailored to the region's unique blend of rapid digital adoption and traditional governance.

Graphical abstract
Figure 4

Coding process flow diagram

Figure 4

Coding process flow diagram

Close Figure 4

Last-mile delivery represents the final and most critical link in supply chains and logistics, where products reach the end consumer directly. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, this sector has gained increasing importance due to the rapid growth of e-commerce, demographic shifts and unregulated urbanization. While last-mile delivery is globally considered the most costly and complex challenge in the supply chain, the specificities of the regional context add new dimensions related to infrastructure, governance and societal behaviors.

The MENA region is witnessing significant growth in delivery markets, with projections indicating that the last-mile sector in the Middle East and Africa will expand at a compound annual growth rate exceeding 10% between 2024 and 2031 (Bagekari, 2025). This growth is driven by increasing demand for fast and flexible delivery services, particularly in major cities such as Riyadh, Dubai, Cairo and Casablanca. However, challenges related to weak infrastructure, inadequate urban planning and multi-cultural and diverse consumer behaviors make achieving sustainability in this sector a complex task.

In addition, some Gulf states have begun adopting innovative solutions such as drones and autonomous robots to reduce costs and enhance efficiency, while others, such as Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Tunisia, still face obstacles related to geopolitical and economic conditions. This disparity reflects the need for multi-layered approaches that combine technological innovation, behavioral interventions and public policies to ensure that last-mile operations in the region are more sustainable, equitable and efficient.

Sustainable last-mile delivery is a critical challenge for rapidly urbanizing MENA cities, driven by the explosive growth of e-commerce, rising consumer expectations and mounting environmental pressures (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Kervola et al., 2022; Shehata, 2023). While technological innovations such as drones, electric vehicles (EVs) and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven logistics have dominated the research agenda, there is growing recognition that behavioral determinants (consumer preferences, courier motivations and socio-cultural norms) are equally vital for the adoption and effectiveness of sustainable delivery solutions (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Prisco et al., 2025; Ganjipour and Edrisi, 2023). The MENA region's unique urban fabric, governance structures and socio-demographic diversity further complicate the landscape, demanding context-sensitive approaches that move “beyond the algorithms” (Shehata, 2023; Chaudhry et al., 2025; Hadoud, 2024).

Despite the rapid digitization of the MENA supply chain, a critical disconnect remains between the technical feasibility of sustainable last-mile delivery (SLMD) and its practical implementation. Current scholarship has predominantly focused on the “hard” infrastructure of logistics – such as the integration of EV fleets or the mathematical optimization of delivery routes – treating the urban environment as a static set of variables. However, in the high-context cultures of the MENA region, the “soft” variables – human agency and socio-cultural norms – often act as the primary gatekeepers of change. There is a significant scarcity of empirical research exploring how consumer psychological constructs (e.g. environmental self-identity vs price sensitivity) and courier behavioral drivers (e.g. job precariousness vs technological self-efficacy) interact to influence the adoption of green logistics (Oflaç and Özcan, 2025). In cities like Amman or Riyadh, where social trust and informal networks play a vital role in the delivery process, ignoring these behavioral determinants results in a “performance gap” where sophisticated algorithms fail to yield sustainable outcomes (Alsoussi, 2025).

The central problem addressed by this study is the widening “intention-behavior gap” observed among MENA e-commerce stakeholders. While regional governments have signaled a strong commitment to sustainability through initiatives like Jordan's Economic Sophistication strategy or Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030, the daily logistics operations remain heavily reliant on carbon-intensive practices. Consumers express a verbal preference for “green” delivery but frequently default to high-frequency, low-efficiency home delivery options due to cultural expectations of “immediacy” and the lack of social incentives for using shared parcel lockers. For couriers, the pressure of performance-based pay models often incentivizes aggressive, fuel-inefficient driving over eco-friendly protocols. Without a clear understanding of these behavioral levers, SLMD interventions risk being perceived as alien impositions rather than localized solutions (Zami et al., 2025).

By pivoting the research lens toward the behavioral determinants of SLMD, this paper seeks to provide a more holistic framework for urban logistics in developing centers. The rationale for this focus is twofold: first, behavioral changes often require significantly less capital investment than large-scale infrastructure overhauls, making them more viable for immediate implementation in resource-constrained urban environments. Second, addressing the socio-cultural specificities of the MENA region such as the gendered nature of delivery reception and the unique geocoding challenges ensures that the proposed solutions are resilient and socially inclusive (Gonzalez et al., 2023). This study contributes to the literature by moving beyond the “Western-centric” models of logistics, offering a context-sensitive analysis of how behavioral change can be engineered to meet the dual goals of economic growth and environmental preservation.

This study introduces a hybrid SLMD framework that integrates behavioral science, governance and technological innovation to explain sustainable last-mile delivery (SLMD) in MENA urban centers. The novelty lies in extending established behavioral theories theory of planned behavior (TPB) that explains the intention-behavior by showing how attitudes, norms and perceived control influence delivery choices, yet often fail to translate into action due to cost sensitivity and infrastructural barriers (Ajzen, 1991), value-belief-norm theory that highlights the role of cultural and moral values, particularly environmental and religious norms, in motivating pro-environmental practices (Stern et al., 1999) and technology acceptance model (TAM) that interprets stakeholders' acceptance of emerging technologies, emphasizing perceived usefulness, ease of use and trust in novel systems such as drones or blockchain (Davis, 1989) – into a logistics context shaped by socio-cultural diversity and governance fragmentation. Unlike existing sustainable urban logistics or smart-city frameworks, which emphasize infrastructure and algorithmic optimization, this model foregrounds human agency and its interaction with institutional and technological systems.

By weaving these theories together, the framework demonstrates how behavioral intentions are mediated by governance structures and enabled or constrained by technology. It explicitly incorporates MENA-specific moderators such as social trust, informal networks, gender roles and economic pragmatism, extending Western-centric models to capture regional realities.

The framework's conceptual insight is that sustainable delivery outcomes emerge at the intersection of three domains: behavioral determinants, governance structures and technological innovation as shown in Figure 1. This integrative approach moves beyond descriptive accounts to explanatory and predictive modeling, offering a more inclusive and context-sensitive lens for SLMD research. In doing so, it challenges the “tech-first” narrative and provides a novel interdisciplinary contribution to sustainable urban logistics.

The literature on SLMD in MENA urban centers reveals a robust body of work focused on technological and operational innovations but a comparatively underdeveloped integration of behavioral determinants within this context. Existing studies extensively document advancements such as EVs, drones, blockchain and AI-driven logistics optimization (Ferreira and Esperanca, 2025; Askri et al., 2025; Engelhardt et al., 2022). These innovations promise substantial environmental and economic benefits, including reduction of emissions and cost efficiency (Lingkon and Ali, 2024; Mahmoodi et al., 2025). However, literature often treats technology as a panacea, neglecting the complex socio-cultural and governance factors that mediate technology adoption and effectiveness.

Behavioral determinants – including consumer preferences, courier motivations and socio-cultural norms – are increasingly recognized as critical but remain insufficiently theorized and empirically explored (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Cauwelier et al., 2024; Alharbi, 2025). While consumer studies highlight price sensitivity, delivery speed, convenience and sustainability information as key drivers (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Thomas et al., 2022), there is a persistent attitude-behavior gap whereby positive environmental attitudes do not consistently translate into sustainable choices (Cauwelier et al., 2024). This gap is compounded by socio-demographic variations, such as age, gender and education, which influence openness to innovative delivery methods (Montero-Vega et al., 2025; Kader et al., 2023).

Courier motivations are shaped by work autonomy, hedonic factors and economic incentives, with technological enablers like blockchain and AI improving trust and operational transparency (Alromema et al., 2025; Kadadha et al., 2023). Yet, organizational culture and lack of clear strategies impede widespread adoption in several MENA markets (Sultan et al., 2023; Ismail and Jokonya, 2023).

Socio-cultural factors, including religious values, social trust and informal networks, act as significant moderators in behavioral adoption (Alharbi, 2025; Al-Kenane et al., 2025). Gender dynamics and environmental knowledge further influence consumer and courier behavior, underscoring the necessity of culturally tailored interventions (Gonzalez et al., 2023; Alawadh et al., 2024).

Governance fragmentation and infrastructural deficits are recurrent themes that limit the scalability and effectiveness of SLMD innovations (Rosales and Haarstad, 2023; Wanganoo and Patil, 2020). Public-private cooperation and smart-city initiatives show promise but face challenges related to institutional barriers and data governance (Chaudhry et al., 2025; Gura et al., 2022).

Critically, literature tends to present behavioral, technological and governance factors as parallel strands rather than interdependent elements. Few studies systematically interrogate the tensions and synergies among these dimensions, particularly in relation to the unique MENA context characterized by rapid urbanization, socio-political instability and cultural heterogeneity (Cauwelier et al., 2024; Rodriguez-Palero et al., 2025).

Moreover, the predominance of stated preference data introduces biases that limit the understanding of actual behaviors, emphasizing the need for empirical validation through revealed preference studies and field experiments (Alkhazali et al., 2025). The scarcity of comprehensive datasets and transparency from local institutions further constraints research depth, particularly outside the Gulf states where infrastructural and governance conditions are more favorable (Alsoussi, 2025).

In summary, the literature calls for deeper theoretical integration of behavioral science frameworks with urban planning and governance models to move beyond descriptive accounts toward explanatory and predictive understanding. This integration should explicitly address the intention-behavior gap, socio-cultural moderators and institutional dynamics unique to MENA urban logistics. Multi-disciplinary, hybrid methodologies combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, including digital twins and stakeholder engagement, are recommended to capture the complexity of SLMD systems (Illahi and Mir, 2021; Shaker et al., 2025).

2.1.1 Behavioral determinants: definitions and scope

Behavioral determinants encompass the psychological, social and cultural factors shaping the actions of consumers, couriers and other stakeholders in last-mile delivery. Key elements include:

  1. Consumer preferences: Price sensitivity, delivery speed, convenience and sustainability information (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Thomas et al., 2022);

  2. Socio-demographic factors: Age, gender, education, income and urban/rural residence (Prisco et al., 2025; Ganjipour and Edrisi, 2023);

  3. Courier motivations: Work autonomy, hedonic motivation, economic incentives and job satisfaction (Alromema et al., 2025) and

  4. Psychological influences: Attitudes, perceived risk, trust, personal norms and the attitude-behavior gap (Prisco et al., 2025; Ganjipour and Edrisi, 2023).

2.1.2 Sustainable last-mile delivery: criteria and innovations

SLMD is defined by the triple bottom line (TBL):

  1. Environmental: Emissions reduction, energy efficiency and modal shift to green vehicles (Kervola et al., 2022; Lingkon and Ali, 2024; Ferreira and Esperanca, 2025);

  2. Economic: Cost efficiency, operational viability and business model innovation (Kervola et al., 2022; Anika et al., 2021);

  3. Social: Job creation, equity, safety and consumer satisfaction (Kervola et al., 2022; Rodriguez-Palero et al., 2025) and

Key innovations include EVs, drones, blockchain, AI and urban consolidation centers (Ferreira and Esperanca, 2025; Askri et al., 2025; Engelhardt et al., 2022).

2.1.3 MENA urban centers: regional context and challenges

MENA cities are characterized by:

  1. Rapid urbanization and informal housing (Shehata, 2023; Chaudhry et al., 2025; Hadoud, 2024);

  2. Environmental pressures: Water scarcity, heat waves and air pollution (Taye et al., 2025; Mohammed Qasem and Scholz, 2025);

  3. Governance structures: Fragmented authority, public-private cooperation and smart-city initiatives (Chaudhry et al., 2025; Gura et al., 2022) and

  4. Infrastructural challenges: Lack of formal addresses, legacy logistics systems and digital divides (Wanganoo and Patil, 2020; Balfaqih and Alharbi, 2022).

This study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology designed to rigorously synthesize the existing body of knowledge on SLMD in the MENA region, with a particular focus on behavioral determinants. The approach integrates quantitative bibliometric mapping and qualitative thematic content analysis to capture both the breadth and depth of relevant research, ensuring methodological rigor, transparency and contextual relevance.

Note: AI language tools were used to assist in refining the clarity and readability of the manuscript text. These tools were employed only for language editing and did not contribute to the research design, data analysis, or conclusions.

The SLR follows a pre-defined protocol aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Page et al., 2021), enabling a transparent, replicable and unbiased selection and evaluation of literature. The review targets both peer-reviewed journal articles and primary conference proceedings (published between 2016 and 2025), as proceedings in this field often undergo peer review and provide relevant empirical insights. The geographic focus is on urban centers within the MENA region, capturing studies that operationalize behavioral constructs alongside sustainability outcomes framed within the triple bottom line (environmental, economic and social).

A comprehensive search was conducted across two primary academic databases, Scopus and Web of Science, selected for their extensive indexing of logistics, urban planning, environmental management and social science literature. The search combined keywords across three thematic blocks using Boolean operators:

  1. Logistics terms: “last-mile delivery,” “urban logistics,” “e-commerce logistics and” “final-mile”;

  2. Behavioral concepts: “stakeholder behavior,” “consumer preference,” “courier motivation,” “perceived risk” and “trust” and

  3. Contextual terms: “MENA,” “Middle East,” “North Africa,” “GCC,” and specific urban centers such as “Dubai,” “Riyadh,” “Amman” and “Cairo”.

3.2.1 Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria were strictly applied to ensure relevance and quality:

  1. Peer-reviewed journal articles and primary conference proceedings published in English from 2016 to 2025;

  2. Studies explicitly address behavioral operationalization (psychological or socio-demographic factors) in SLMD;

  3. Research focusing on sustainability outcomes within the triple bottom line framework and

  4. Geographic focus on MENA urban centers or comparative studies including the region.

Exclusion criteria filtered out:

  1. Grey literature, book reviews, editorials, theses and conference abstracts;

  2. Studies focusing solely on long-haul freight modes (maritime and air cargo) and

  3. Research without explicit urban or regional contextualization.

Table 1 below outlines the applied parameter to ensure the review remained focused on behavioral and regional dimensions. This structured filtering ensures that the review remains centered on contemporary urban challenges rather than general logistics theory.

Table 1

Systematic literature review – eligibility criteria (researcher)

CriterionInclusion criteria (accepted)Exclusion criteria (rejected)
TimeframeStudies were published between 2016 and 2025Research published prior to 2016 (to ensure technological relevance)
Document typePeer-reviewed journal articles and primary conference proceedingsBook reviews, editorials, theses, and “grey” literature
LanguageFull-text available in EnglishStudies in other languages without official translations
Stakeholder focusResearch addressing consumers, couriers or policymakers (stakeholder behavior)Purely mechanical or engineering-focused studies with no human element
SustainabilityFocus on the Triple Bottom Line (environmental, economic or social)Studies focused solely on profit maximization or traditional logistics
Geographic scopeMENA Urban Centers or direct comparative studies involving the regionStudies focused exclusively on rural areas or Western-only contexts (e.g. EU/US)
Delivery modeLast-mile delivery, e-commerce logistics and urban freightLong-haul shipping, maritime logistics or air-cargo mid-stream

3.2.2 Study selection and screening

The initial search yielded 269 records imported into Zotero for management. Following deduplication, titles and abstracts were screened against eligibility criteria, resulting in 114 articles for full-text review. Further screening excluded 58 studies lacking sufficient behavioral focus or urban context, leading to a final corpus of 56 studies included for synthesis. The selection process is documented in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (Figure 2).

Figure 1

Hybrid framework for SLMD in developing centers

Figure 1

Hybrid framework for SLMD in developing centers

Close Figure 1

To capture both macro-level trends and micro-level behavioral insights, a dual-strategy synthesis was employed:

3.3.1 Bibliometric mapping

Metadata from the 56 studies (publication year, keywords, authorship and geographic focus) were analyzed using science-mapping techniques, including co-citation and keyword co-occurrence analyses. This quantitative mapping visualized research clusters, temporal trends and dominant thematic areas within MENA SLMD literature, informing the qualitative coding framework.

Figure 3 displaying co-citation networks and keyword co-occurrence clusters. Visualization highlights dominant thematic areas, temporal trends and research clusters across the 56 selected studies.

Figure 2

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the study selection process

Figure 2

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the study selection process

Close Figure 2

3.3.2 Thematic coding

The qualitative synthesis followed the three-step coding process suggested by Saldaña (2021), Figure 4 illustrating the progression from raw codes – such as delivery speed, trust in automation, regulatory fragmentation and religious values – to axial categories (consumer preferences, courier motivations, governance and infrastructure and socio-cultural factors) and finally to selective themes (intention–behavior gap, stakeholder trust and incentives, policy and cultural barriers).

Figure 3

Bibliometric mapping of SLMD studies in MENA

Figure 3

Bibliometric mapping of SLMD studies in MENA

Close Figure 3

This figure visually represents Saldaña's three-step coding process (open, axial and selective), clarifying how behavioral, technological and governance dimensions were systematically synthesized within the SLMD context. It enhances methodological transparency by showing the logical progression from individual insights to overarching themes.

3.3.3 Quality assessment (critical appraisal)

Each study underwent critical appraisal using a modified mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) (Hong et al., 2018), assessing: methodological transparency and rigor, appropriateness of sampling strategies and validity and reliability of conclusions.

Studies rated below a “moderate” quality threshold were excluded from the final synthesis to ensure robustness of evidence. Inter-coder reliability for thematic coding was established through double coding of 20% of the sample, yielding a Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.82, indicating strong agreement (Cohen, 1960; McHugh, 2012).

3.3.4 Meta-synthesis of sustainability outcomes

Finally, the review analyzed the reported “outcomes” of sustainable innovations. This involved categorizing findings into the triple bottom line (TBL) framework. We specifically looked for “trade-offs” – for instance, where an environmental gain (e.g. using electric drones) might result in a social loss (e.g. noise pollution or job displacement for traditional couriers).

Consumer Preferences and Acceptance

  1. Key drivers: Delivery price, speed, convenience and sustainability information are primary factors influencing consumer acceptance of sustainable last-mile options (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Thomas et al., 2022);

  2. Socio-demographic variation: Younger, urban and more educated consumers are more open to innovative and green delivery methods (e.g. parcel lockers and autonomous robots) (Montero-Vega et al., 2025; Kader et al., 2023);

  3. Psychological factors: Social influence, hedonic motivation and personal norms positively affect adoption, while perceived risk and need for human interaction are barriers (Ganjipour and Edrisi, 2023; Kenesei et al., 2025).

  4. Attitude-behavior gap: Positive environmental attitudes do not always translate into sustainable choices, highlighting the need for targeted interventions (Cauwelier et al., 2024).

Courier motivations and workforce retention

  1. Work autonomy and hedonic motivation are critical for attracting and retaining couriers in crowd-sourced models, especially in Saudi Arabia (Alromema et al., 2025);

  2. Economic incentives are important but less decisive than autonomy and enjoyment, particularly for occasional workers (Alromema et al., 2025) and

  3. Technological enablers: Blockchain and AI improve transparency, trust and operational efficiency, supporting workforce sustainability (Kadadha et al., 2023; Elmay et al., 2024).

Socio-demographic and cultural influences

  1. Cultural norms and social influence (including religious values) shape consumer intentions, with notable effects in Gulf countries (Alharbi, 2025; Al-Kenane et al., 2025);

  2. Gender and education affect delivery preferences and openness to new technologies (Montero-Vega et al., 2025; Kader et al., 2023) and

  3. Environmental knowledge and altruism enhance green behavior, suggesting the importance of education and awareness campaigns (Alawadh et al., 2024).

Psychological factors and perceived risk

  1. Perceived risk (privacy, safety and theft) is a major barrier to autonomous delivery adoption; trust-building and transparent communication are essential (Kenesei et al., 2025; Wu et al., 2024);

  2. Personal norms mediate the effect of social norms on sustainable behavior, with hedonic motivation varying across demographic groups (Prisco et al., 2025; Polisetty et al., 2024) and

  3. Technology-related anxiety and complexity reduce adoption; regulatory support and user education can mitigate these effects (Zhou et al., 2025; Alharasees et al., 2024).

Barriers and gaps in behavioral adoption

  1. Organizational culture: Lack of clear strategies, technical knowledge and collaboration impede adoption in Egypt and other MENA markets (Sultan et al., 2023; Ismail and Jokonya, 2023);

  2. Consumer priorities: Economic criteria often outweigh environmental concerns, creating a cultural barrier to sustainability (Boggio-Marzet et al., 2023) and

  3. Infrastructure deficits: Poor addressing systems and legacy logistics reduce efficiency and satisfaction (Wanganoo and Patil, 2020).

Synthesis:

Behavioral determinants are increasingly recognized but often under-theorized or treated as secondary to technological and economic factors. There is a need for deeper, context-specific behavioral research, especially integrating cultural and psychological dimensions unique to MENA (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Cauwelier et al., 2024; Alharbi, 2025).

Business models and multi-stakeholder approaches

  1. Traditional vs crowd-shipping: Crowd-shipping emphasizes social sustainability (job creation and flexibility), while traditional models focus on employer responsibility and carbon neutrality (Kervola et al., 2022; Rodriguez-Palero et al., 2025);

  2. Hybrid models: Combining commercial vehicles, micro-depots and green vehicles enhances efficiency and sustainability (Jazbec and Rogic, 2024; Ninovic et al., 2025) and

  3. Multi-stakeholder governance: Collaboration among public, private and community actors is critical but often hampered by unclear priorities and institutional barriers (Rodriguez-Palero et al., 2025; Plazier et al., 2024).

Technological innovations beyond algorithms

  1. EVs, drones and autonomous robots are increasingly adopted, reducing emissions and operational costs but requiring supportive infrastructure and policy (Ferreira and Esperanca, 2025; Silvestri et al., 2025).

  2. Blockchain and AI improve transparency, trust and efficiency, but face scalability and regulatory challenges in MENA (Askri et al., 2025; Guerriero et al., 2023).

  3. Connected vehicle technologies and Internet of Things (IoT) enable real-time optimization and resource sharing (Hmama et al., 2025).

Cost-benefit and operational trade-offs

  1. Electric bikes and drones: Offer significant emissions reductions (up to 92%) but may increase costs and face operational constraints (battery life, weather) (Lingkon and Ali, 2024; Mahmoodi et al., 2025);

  2. Automated delivery robots: Reduce costs and congestion but require efficient scheduling and consumer acceptance (Anika et al., 2021; Edrisi and Ganjipour, 2022) and

  3. Hybrid fleets: Mixed strategies (drones, bikes and trucks) optimize for different urban contexts and delivery types (Mahmoodi et al., 2025; Lazarevic et al., 2024).

Urban consolidation centers and micro-depots

  1. Strategic location of micro-depots reduces delivery distances, emissions and costs, especially when combined with green vehicles (Guerrero and Diaz-Ramirez, 2017; Dridi et al., 2025) and

  2. Multi-modal integration is essential for dense MENA cities with complex urban fabrics (Guerrero and Diaz-Ramirez, 2017; Tanyas and Ozkanlisoy, 2025).

Incentives and consumer engagement

  1. Financial incentives (e.g. surcharges on unsustainable options) are effective but may reduce satisfaction (Kokkinou et al., 2024);

  2. Non-financial incentives (sustainability messaging and information sharing) can shift preferences, especially among younger consumers (Rose et al., 2025; Veličković et al., 2025) and

  3. Blockchain-based rewards show promise for encouraging sustainable choices (Raza et al., 2023).

Synthesis:

Technological and business model innovation is robust, but the behavioral dimension – how consumers and couriers respond to these innovations – is less systematically integrated. Multi-stakeholder and incentive-based approaches are promising but require further behavioral research (Kervola et al., 2022; Rodriguez-Palero et al., 2025; Ros et al., 2025).

Urban governance and policy frameworks

  1. Institutional barriers: Weak institutions, fragmented governance and political instability hinder sustainable delivery system implementation (Rosales and Haarstad, 2023; Poudineh et al., 2018);

  2. Public-private cooperation: Networks like business improvement districts enhance stakeholder engagement and sustainability (Emami-Skardi et al., 2025) and

  3. Smart-city governance: Digital platforms and information and communication technology (ICT) improve efficiency and participation but require robust data privacy and security frameworks (Gura et al., 2022; Bastos et al., 2022).

Environmental and infrastructural challenges

  1. Water scarcity and heat waves: Drive the need for energy-efficient, resilient logistics solutions (Mohammed Qasem and Scholz, 2025; Saad and Boussi, 2025).

  2. Rapid urbanization and informal housing: Create spatial inequalities and infrastructure deficits, complicating last-mile delivery (Taye et al., 2025; Tajudeen et al., 2025).

  3. Lack of formal addresses: Reduces efficiency; Global Positioning System, IoT and Transportation Management System are needed for improvement (Wanganoo and Patil, 2020).

Smart city technologies and digital governance

  1. Citizen participation: Enabled by ICT, digital platforms and smart contracts but challenged by privacy and digital divides (Gura et al., 2022; Hysa et al., 2023).

  2. Data governance: Essential for trust and effective smart-city logistics (Jarour and Mocanu, 2025; Subrahmanyam, 2025).

Institutional barriers and best practices

  1. Best practices: Regional cooperation, innovative regulatory frameworks and sustainable development goal-aligned, community-oriented approaches are effective (Anwana and Owojori, 2024; Aburamadan et al., 2024) and

  2. Education and awareness: Critical for building support for sustainable governance (Wodon, 2023).

Synthesis:

MENA urban centers present unique challenges and opportunities for sustainable last-mile delivery. Governance, infrastructure and environmental pressures are well-documented, but the integration of behavioral determinants with these contextual factors is limited (Shehata, 2023; Chaudhry et al., 2025; Hadoud, 2024).

SLMD in MENA urban centers must be situated within the broader paradigm of sustainable urban mobility transitions, particularly under the emerging CalmMobility framework developed by Turoń (2025). CalmMobility emphasizes a shift from policy uncertainty and fragmented governance toward integrated, human-centered urban mobility systems that prioritize environmental sustainability, social equity and quality of life (Marsden and Reardon, 2017). This paradigm aligns closely with the hybrid SLMD framework by highlighting the interplay between behavioral logistics, urban planning and governance within wider urban mobility transformations.

Within this context, behavioral logistics addresses the human agency component – how consumer preferences, courier motivations and socio-cultural norms influence delivery behaviors and acceptance of sustainable mobility options. These behavioral determinants mediate the effectiveness of technological innovations and infrastructural investments, underscoring that sustainable outcomes depend on aligning individual and collective behaviors with urban mobility goals (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Shehata, 2023).

Urban planning, under CalmMobility, advocates for integrated land-use and transport strategies that facilitate multi-modal freight and passenger flows, reduce dependency on carbon-intensive delivery modes and support infrastructure such as urban consolidation centers, micro-depots and dedicated lanes for low-emission vehicles (Taniguchi, 2015; Guerrero and Díaz-Ramírez, 2017). This planning approach ensures that SLMD operations are embedded within the broader mobility ecosystem, enabling modal shifts and reducing congestion and emissions.

Governance plays a crucial role in transitioning from policy uncertainty to CalmMobility by fostering multi-level coordination, stakeholder engagement and adaptive regulatory frameworks that support innovation while addressing socio-cultural diversity and infrastructural challenges typical of MENA cities (Chaudhry et al., 2025; Dimitropoulos and Lokhandwala, 2021). Effective governance integrates behavioral insights into policy design, ensuring that incentives, regulations and public-private partnerships resonate with local contexts and encourage sustainable mobility behaviors.

Together, these dimensions create a dynamic feedback loop where behavioral logistics inform urban planning and governance decisions, which in turn shape the conditions for sustainable last-mile delivery within the evolving urban mobility landscape. Embedding SLMD within the CalmMobility paradigm advances a holistic, context-sensitive approach that transcends technology-centric solutions, emphasizing human-centered, equitable and resilient urban mobility transitions in MENA.

The existing literature on SLMD in MENA urban centers provides a strong descriptive foundation, particularly around technological innovations and operational models. Yet, behavioral drivers – such as consumer preferences, courier motivations and socio-cultural norms – remain undertheorized and often treated as secondary. This gap contributes to the persistent intention–behavior divide, where positive sustainability attitudes fail to translate into consistent pro-environmental actions due to economic pragmatism, infrastructural constraints and fragmented governance.

Critically, current studies tend to silo behavioral, technological and governance factors rather than examining their dynamic interdependencies. For example, socio-cultural norms both enable and constrain technology adoption, while governance fragmentation undermines coordinated behavioral interventions. Regional disparities between Gulf and non-Gulf states further complicate these relationships. Moreover, reliance on stated preference data limits empirical robustness, underscoring the need for revealed preference studies and field experiments.

Promising approaches – such as multi-stakeholder governance models, incentive-based interventions and smart-city initiatives – show potential but remain weakly integrated with behavioral insights. Advancing SLMD research therefore requires a paradigm shift toward interdisciplinary frameworks that systematically link behavioral science with urban planning and governance. Hybrid methodologies – including digital twins, participatory stakeholder engagement and behavioral experiments – can better capture the complexity of logistics systems in culturally diverse and infrastructurally constrained environments.

To consolidate these insights, Table 2 summarizes the extent of literature coverage, key gaps and directions for future research. The synthesis highlights that while technological and operational innovations are extensively documented, behavioral determinants and their integration with regional governance remain underexplored. Identified gaps point to the need for cross-disciplinary methodologies, context-sensitive behavioral analysis and policy innovation tailored to socio-cultural realities. The proposed directions for future research emphasize deepening behavioral inquiry, contextualizing interventions and advancing hybrid models that combine digital simulations with stakeholder engagement.

Table 2

Synthesis and research gaps

DimensionFindings/coverageKey references
Extent of literature fit and coverageBehavioral determinants: Moderately covered, with emphasis on consumer preferences and some attention to courier motivations and psychological factors. Limited deep behavioral theory and cross-country cultural analysisKarlı and Tanyaş (2024), Cauwelier et al. (2024) and Alharbi (2025) 
Sustainable last-mile delivery: Extensively covered, especially technological and operational innovations, but less so in relation to behavioral interventionsKervola et al. (2022), Lingkon and Ali (2024) and Ferreira and Esperanca (2025) 
MENA urban centers: Regional context and governance addressed, but integration with behavioral determinants remains superficialShehata (2023), Chaudhry et al. (2025) and Hadoud (2024) 
Identified gaps and underexplored areasIntegration of behavioral and regional analysis: Few studies systematically link behavioral determinants with MENA-specific urban challengesCauwelier et al. (2024), Rodriguez-Palero et al. (2025) and Illahi and Mir (2022) 
Cross-disciplinary methodologies: Limited use of hybrid approaches combining behavioral experiments, digital twins and stakeholder engagementIllahi and Mir (2021) and Shaker et al. (2025) 
Policy innovation: Need for regulatory and incentive frameworks tailored to MENA's socio-cultural and infrastructural realitiesDimitropoulos and Lokhandwala (2021) and Alkhazali et al. (2025) 
Directions for Future ResearchDeepen behavioral research: Apply advanced behavioral science methods (e.g. field experiments and nudges) in MENA urban logisticsAlkhazali et al. (2025) 
Contextualization of interventions: Develop and test interventions reflecting cultural, demographic and infrastructural diversity in MENA citiesMogire et al. (2025) and Dimitropoulos and Lokhandwala (2021) 
Hybrid models: Combine digital twin simulations with stakeholder analysis and behavioral modeling for comprehensive assessmentIllahi and Mir (2021), Shaker et al. (2025) 
Policy and governance innovation: Investigate flexible, multi-level governance arrangements encouraging public–private–community partnerships and citizen engagementDimitropoulos and Lokhandwala (2021) and Gura et al. (2022) 

The reviewed literature situates SLMD within the broader landscape of urban freight and mobility transitions, emphasizing that logistics cannot be disentangled from governance, planning and socio-cultural realities. Technological and operational innovations – such as electric fleets, drones and smart-city platforms – are extensively documented, but their effectiveness depends on embedding behavioral insights into adaptive policy frameworks. Evidence shows that consumer attitudes, courier motivations and socio-cultural norms mediate adoption, shaping whether innovations achieve sustainability outcomes.

The literature consistently highlights a persistent intention–behavior gap, where positive sustainability attitudes often fail to translate into consistent pro-environmental practices. This gap is reinforced by governance fragmentation, infrastructural limitations and economic pragmatism, particularly noted in non-Gulf contexts. Studies also emphasize that SLMD should be understood as part of integrated urban freight systems, where delivery flows interact with passenger transport, land-use planning and smart-city strategies. Fragmented approaches risk exacerbating congestion, emissions and inequities. The CalmMobility paradigm, originally developed by Turoń (2025), offers a useful lens here, emphasizing sequencing, citizen inclusion and policy coherence.

Building on this evidence, the MENA region presents a highly heterogeneous landscape for SLMD, characterized by significant disparities in governance, infrastructure and socio-cultural dynamics across Gulf states and non-Gulf countries. The systematic review highlights that while Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) benefit from active “smart city” initiatives and relatively advanced infrastructure, other parts of the region, including Levantine and North African urban centers, face more pronounced infrastructural deficits and governance fragmentation (Alsoussi, 2025; Shehata, 2023; Chaudhry et al., 2025).

The literature points to challenges such as fragmented governance structures, varying degrees of public–private cooperation and infrastructural limitations, including the lack of formal addressing systems and legacy logistics frameworks (Rosales and Haarstad, 2023; Wanganoo and Patil, 2020). These factors contribute to operational inefficiencies and complicate the adoption of sustainable delivery innovations. Behavioral determinants are further influenced by socio-cultural factors that differ markedly within the region. For example, social trust, informal networks and gender roles have been identified as important moderators in delivery practices, with variations noted between urban centers (Alharbi, 2025; Al-Kenane et al., 2025; Gonzalez et al., 2023). The review also documents an intention–behavior gap shaped by economic pragmatism and infrastructural constraints, which affects consumer and courier adoption of green logistics (Karlı and Tanyaş, 2024; Cauwelier et al., 2024).

It is important to note that while some studies suggest limited environmental awareness or stakeholder engagement in certain contexts, these findings are not uniform across the region. The diversity of socio-economic and political conditions necessitates caution in generalizing about “material and intellectual poverty” or “weak stakeholder behavior” without specifying the geographic or socio-political scope. Instead, the evidence supports a nuanced understanding that governance fragmentation and infrastructural challenges interact with behavioral factors to influence SLMD outcomes variably across MENA urban centers.

Therefore, the interpretation emphasizes the need for context-sensitive approaches that recognize intra-regional differences and avoid broad normative characterizations. Tailored interventions should be informed by localized empirical data and incorporate behavioral insights aligned with specific cultural, economic and governance contexts. This approach aligns with the hybrid SLMD framework's focus on integrating behavioral determinants with governance and technological innovation, explicitly accounting for MENA-specific moderators such as social trust, informal networks and economic pragmatism.

Together, these insights underscore the fragmented state of current scholarship and highlight the need for integrative solutions. The proposed hybrid SLMD framework directly responds to these challenges by systematically linking behavioral determinants, governance structures and technological innovation. By explicitly accounting for MENA-specific moderators such as social trust, informal networks and economic pragmatism, the framework provides a context-sensitive model that advances both explanatory and predictive capacity for sustainable last-mile delivery in diverse urban settings.

Future research should prioritize interdisciplinary collaboration and creative methodological designs to deepen behavioral understanding, contextualize interventions and foster flexible governance arrangements. Empirical validation through mixed methods and stakeholder engagement will be crucial to operationalize theoretical insights and translate them into effective, culturally attuned practices.

Ultimately, moving beyond the prevailing “tech-first” narrative toward more human-centered, context-sensitive solutions offers the most viable pathway to achieving sustainable, equitable and resilient last-mile delivery in the rapidly urbanizing and diverse MENA region.

7.2.1 Research implications

Future studies should move beyond descriptive accounts by employing revealed preference data, longitudinal designs and mixed-methods approaches to validate behavioral determinants. Particular attention should be given to socio-cultural moderators – such as trust, gender norms and informal networks – that shape adoption in MENA contexts. Expanding comparative research across regions will also clarify the generalizability of the hybrid SLMD framework and strengthen its theoretical contribution to urban mobility transitions.

7.2.2 Main contributions

  1. Behavioral emphasis: This study moves beyond a purely technological lens, highlighting the importance of human factors such as consumer attitudes, courier motivations and socio-cultural norms in shaping logistics outcomes.

  2. Regional relevance: It offers a MENA-focused perspective, directly engaging with the region's distinctive governance structures, infrastructural realities and cultural contexts in urban logistics.

  3. Methodological strength: The research applies a SLR guided by PRISMA standards, complemented by bibliometric mapping and thematic coding, ensuring a rigorous and transparent synthesis.

  4. Integrative approach: It proposes a framework that brings together multiple stakeholders, combining insights from behavioral science, urban planning and governance to foster more holistic solutions.

7.2.3 Limitations

Despite these contributions, the review is subject to certain limitations. A notable constraint is the geographical imbalance within the available literature. The Gulf states – particularly Saudi Arabia and the UAE – are disproportionately represented, largely due to their active “smart city” initiatives, while empirical studies from the Levant and North African urban centers remain scarce. This uneven distribution limits the generalizability of findings across the wider MENA region. Additionally, the reliance on existing literature introduces an inherent “stated preference” bias common in behavioral surveys. Respondents often report a higher willingness to adopt sustainable delivery technologies than what is observed in actual market behavior. As a result, while the review provides valuable insights, its conclusions must be interpreted with caution and complemented by future empirical research that captures revealed preferences and real-world practices. Finally, the exclusion of “grey literature” and non-indexed regional reports may have omitted specific municipal policy insights that are not yet captured in the global academic databases of Scopus and Web of Science.

Aburamadan
,
R.
,
Cotella
,
V.A.
and
Darwish
,
R.
(
2024
), “
Sanitation infrastructure challenges in global south poverty pockets: towards a multidisciplinary approach to sustainable health–the Jordanian case
”,
Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development
, Vol. 
8
No. 
8
, p.
5309
, doi: .
Ajzen
,
I.
(
1991
), “
The theory of planned behavior
”,
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
.
Al-Kenane
,
K.
,
Almoraish
,
A.
,
Al-Enezi
,
D.
,
Al-Matrouk
,
A.
,
AlBuloushi
,
N.
and
Alreshaid
,
F.
(
2025
), “
The process through which young adults form attitudes towards sustainable products through social media exposure in Kuwait
”,
Sustainability
, Vol. 
17
No. 
10
, p.
4442
, doi: .
Alawadh
,
A.
,
Rafi
,
N.
,
Kalyar
,
M.N.
and
Abrudan
,
D.B.
(
2024
), “
The role of motivation and knowledge in promoting green consumer behavior in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan
”,
Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development
, Vol. 
8
No. 
13
, p.
9152
, doi: .
Alharasees
,
O.
,
Al Hasanat
,
H.A.
and
Alothman
,
D.
(
2024
), “
Public perception of autonomous and shared autonomous vehicles: case study of amman
”,
2024 2nd International Conference on Technology Innovation and its Applications (ICTIIA)
,
IEEE
, pp. 
1
-
5
.
Alharbi
,
B.F.M.
(
2025
), “
The Role of social and cultural factors in consumers' adoption of innovative green products: exploring green marketing strategies
”,
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
, Vol. 
9
No. 
2
, pp. 
2375
-
2393
, doi: .
Alkhazali
,
Q.M.
,
Ooi
,
K.-B.
,
Shyu
,
W.-H.
and
Tan
,
G.
(
2025
), “
Driving toward sustainability: extending the value-belief-norm theory to understand the willingness to purchase full electric vehicles in Jordan
”,
Management and Sustainability: An Arab Review
, Vol. 
4
No. 
1
, pp.
1
-
21
, doi: .
Alromema
,
M.
,
Al Hanbali
,
A.
,
Baubaid
,
A.
,
AlGhazi
,
A.
,
Khan
,
N.T.
and
Saleh
,
Z.
(
2025
), “
Factors influencing couriers' acceptance of crowdsourcing in last-mile delivery in Saudi Arabia
”,
International Journal of Logistics Management
, Vol. 
36
No. 
6
, pp. 
1742
-
1765
, doi: .
Alsoussi
,
A.
(
2025
), “
Improving last-mile delivery in Amman: an exploratory study of challenges and solutions
”,
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
, Vol. 
8
No. 
6
, pp. 
3249
-
3264
, doi: .
Anika
,
T.
,
Dan
,
L.
and
Kaisar
,
E.I.
(
2021
), “
An optimization model for determining optimal fleet size for a robot-sharing system
”,
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021
, pp. 
450
-
467
.
Anwana
,
E.
and
Owojori
,
O.M.
(
2024
), “
Policy options for achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the MENA region through the effective implementation of multilateral environmental agreements
”,
Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The)
, Vol. 
15
No. 
2
, pp. 
86
-
113
, doi: .
Askri
,
S.
,
Kweh
,
Q.L.
and
Chabani
,
Z.
(
2025
),
Sustainable Innovation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region
,
IGI Global
,
Hershey, PA
.
Bagekari
,
A.
(
2025
), “
Middle East last mile delivery market analysis 2026
”,
Cognitive Market Research and Consulting
,
available at:
 https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/regional-analysis/middle-east-and-africa-last-mile-delivery-market-report (
accessed
 19 January 2026).
Balfaqih
,
M.
and
Alharbi
,
S.A.
(
2022
), “
Associated information and communication technologies challenges of smart city development
”,
Sustainability
, Vol. 
14
No. 
23
, 16240, doi: .
Bastos
,
D.
,
Fernández-Caballero
,
A.
,
Pereira
,
A.
and
Rocha
,
N.P.
(
2022
), “
Smart city applications to promote citizen participation in city management and governance: a systematic review
”,
Informatics
, Vol. 
9
No. 
4
, p.
89
, doi: .
Boggio-Marzet
,
A.
,
Villa-Martínez
,
R.
and
Monzón
,
A.
(
2023
), “
Selection of policy actions for e-commerce last-mile delivery in cities: an online multi-actor multi-criteria evaluation
”,
Transport Policy
, Vol. 
142
, pp. 
15
-
27
, doi: .
Cauwelier
,
K.
,
Buldeo Rai
,
H.
,
Puttemans
,
K.
,
Macharis
,
C.
and
Mommens
,
K.
(
2024
), “
From cart to door: unravelling consumer behaviour through attitudinal sustainability profiles
”,
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
, Vol. 
130
, 104168, doi: .
Chaudhry
,
A.G.
,
Masoumi
,
H.
and
Dienel
,
H.-L.
(
2025
), “
Synergizing urban and mobility governance: insights from Dubai and Lahore
”,
Journal of Urban Management
, Vol. 
14
No. 
3
, pp. 
856
-
876
, doi: .
Cohen
,
J.
(
1960
), “
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
”,
Educational and Psychological Measurement
, Vol. 
20
No. 
1
, pp. 
37
-
46
, doi: .
Davis
,
F.D.
(
1989
), “
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
”,
MIS Quarterly
, Vol. 
13
No. 
3
, pp.
319
-
340
.
Dimitropoulos
,
G.
and
Lokhandwala
,
A.
(
2021
), “
Addressing climate change in the MENA region through regulatory design: instrument choice questions
”, pp. 
63
-
81
,
available at:
 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85118329192&partnerID=40&md5=cad26a9c23323f0a22597c256540ab0f
Dridi
,
H.
,
Neji Ben Salem
,
Z.
and
Bouziri
,
H.
(
2025
), “
Location optimization of micro-depots in urban food logistics
”,
International Conference on Science, Engineering Management and Information Technology
,
Springer Nature Switzerland
,
Cham
, pp. 
309
-
323
.
Edrisi
,
A.
and
Ganjipour
,
H.
(
2022
), “
Factors affecting intention and attitude toward sidewalk autonomous delivery robots among online shoppers
”,
Transportation Planning and Technology
, Vol. 
45
No. 
7
, pp. 
588
-
609
, doi: .
Elmay
,
F.
,
Kadadha
,
M.
,
Mizouni
,
R.
,
Singh
,
S.
,
Otrok
,
H.
and
Mourad
,
A.
(
2024
), “
Digital twins and dynamic NFTs for blockchain-based crowdsourced last-mile delivery
”,
Information Processing and Management
, Vol. 
61
No. 
4
, 103756, doi: .
Emami-Skardi
,
M.J.
,
Edrisi
,
M.S.
,
Kerachian
,
R.
,
Sari
,
H.
and
Abdolhay
,
A.
(
2025
), “
Modeling cooperation diffusion for urban water and reclaimed wastewater resources management
”,
Environmental Development
, Vol. 
58
, 101392, doi: .
Engelhardt
,
M.
,
Seeck
,
S.
and
Geier
,
B.
(
2022
), “
Artificial intelligence in urban last mile logistics-status quo, potentials and key challenges
”,
International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics
,
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, pp. 
275
-
289
.
Ferreira
,
J.C.
and
Esperança
,
M.
(
2025
), “
Enhancing sustainable last-mile delivery: the impact of electric vehicles and AI optimization on urban logistics
”,
World Electric Vehicle Journal
, Vol. 
16
No. 
5
, p.
242
, doi: .
Ganjipour
,
H.
and
Edrisi
,
A.
(
2023
), “
Applying the integrated model to understanding online buyers' intention to adopt delivery drones in Iran
”,
Transportation Letters
, Vol. 
15
No. 
2
, pp. 
98
-
110
, doi: .
Gonzalez
,
K.D.
,
Kurshitashvili
,
N.
,
Carvajal
,
K.G.
and
Pickup
,
L.
(
2023
), “
Closing gender gaps in transport
”,
World Bank Thematic Policy Notes Series
.
Guerrero
,
J.C.
and
Díaz-Ramírez
,
J.
(
2017
), “
A review on transportation last-mile network design and urban freight vehicles
”,
Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
,
IEOM Society International
,
Bristol, UK
, pp. 
533
-
552
.
Guerriero
,
F.
,
Scalzo
,
E.
,
Calabró
,
R.P.
and
Scarfó
,
G.
(
2023
),
A Blockchain-Based System for the Last-Mile Delivery
,
SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications
,
Setúbal
, pp.
237
-
244
, doi: .
Gura
,
K.S.
,
Guri
,
F.
,
Gura
,
S.
and
Dollija
,
E.
(
2022
), “
Citizen participation, good governance, and ICT nexus for the sustainability of smart cities
”,
International Conference on Economic Scientific Research-Theoretical, Empirical and Practical Approaches
,
Springer Nature Switzerland
,
Cham
, pp. 
155
-
170
.
Hadoud
,
A.
(
2024
), “
Urban challenges in the Middle East and North Africa
”,
Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva
, Vol. 
104
No. 
1
, pp. 
129
-
140
, doi: .
Hmama
,
H.
,
Oualidi
,
A.E.
and
Mharzi
,
H.
(
2025
), “Enhancing last-mile delivery efficiency through connected vehicle technology and collaborative logistics: a systematic literature review”, in
Farhaoui
,
Y.
,
Herawan
,
T.
,
Imoize
,
A.L.
and
Allaoui
,
A.E.
(Eds),
Intersection of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Cutting-Edge Technologies: From Concepts to Applications in Smart Environment
,
Springer Nature
, pp.
48
-
57
.
Hong
,
Q.N.
,
Fàbregues
,
S.
,
Bartlett
,
G.
,
Boardman
,
F.
,
Cargo
,
M.
,
Dagenais
,
P.
,
Gagnon
,
M.P.
,
Griffiths
,
F.
,
Nicolau
,
B.
,
O'Cathain
,
A.
,
Rousseau
,
M.C.
,
Vedel
,
I.
and
Pluye
,
P.
(
2018
), “
The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
”,
Education for Information
, Vol. 
34
No. 
4
, pp. 
285
-
291
, doi: .
Hysa
,
X.
,
Guazzo
,
G.M.
,
Çekani
,
V.
and
Rosati
,
P.
(
2023
), “Privacy and smart cities: a bibliometric analysis”, in
The International Research & Innovation Forum
,
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, pp. 
151
-
161
.
Illahi
,
U.
and
Mir
,
M.S.
(
2021
), “
Assessment of transport sustainability using a hybrid approach: a comparison of four metropolitan cities of India
”,
Case Studies in Transport Policy
, Vol. 
9
No. 
2
, pp. 
703
-
714
, doi: .
Illahi
,
U.
and
Mir
,
M.S.
(
2022
), “
An indicator-based integrated methodology for evaluating sustainability in transportation systems using multivariate statistics and fuzzy logic
”,
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
, Vol. 
13
No. 
1
, pp. 
43
-
72
, doi: .
Ismail
,
R.E.
and
Jokonya
,
O.
(
2023
), “
Factors affecting the adoption of emerging technologies in last-mile delivery in the retail industry
”,
Procedia Computer Science
, Vol. 
219
, pp. 
2084
-
2092
, doi: .
Jarour
,
A.
and
Mocanu
,
M.
(
2025
), “
Smart urban governance frameworks: a comparative analysis
”,
UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
, Vol. 
87
No. 
3
, pp. 
95
-
106
.
Jazbec
,
M.S.
and
Rogić
,
K.
(
2024
), “
Optimizing last-mile delivery: exploring hybrid models
”,
Scientific and Technical Conference Transport Systems Theory and Practice
,
Springer Nature Switzerland
,
Cham
, pp. 
33
-
43
.
Kadadha
,
M.
,
Mizouni
,
R.
,
Singh
,
S.
,
Otrok
,
H.
and
Mourad
,
A.
(
2023
), “Blockchain-based reputation management framework for crowdsourced last-mile delivery”, in
2023 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC)
,
IEEE
, pp. 
1244
-
1249
.
Kader
,
M.S.
,
Rashaduzzaman
,
M.
,
Huang
,
X.
and
Kim
,
S.
(
2023
), “
Influencing factors toward e-shoppers' adoption of green last-mile delivery
”,
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
, Vol. 
51
No. 
2
, pp. 
220
-
237
, doi: .
Karlı
,
H.
and
Tanyaş
,
M.
(
2024
), “
Innovative delivery methods in the last-mile: unveiling consumer preference
”,
Future Transportation
, Vol. 
4
No. 
1
, pp. 
152
-
173
, doi: .
Kenesei
,
Z.
,
Kökény
,
L.
,
Ásványi
,
K.
and
Jászberényi
,
M.
(
2025
), “
The central role of trust and perceived risk in the acceptance of autonomous vehicles in an integrated UTAUT model
”,
European Transport Research Review
, Vol. 
17
No. 
1
, p.
8
, doi: .
Kervola
,
H.
,
Kallionpää
,
E.
and
Liimatainen
,
H.
(
2022
), “
Delivering goods using a baby pram: the sustainability of last-mile logistics business models
”,
Sustainability
, Vol. 
14
No. 
21
, p.
14031
, doi: .
Kokkinou
,
A.
,
Quak
,
H.
,
Mitas
,
O.
and
Mandemakers
,
A.
(
2024
), “
Should I wait or should I go? Encouraging customers to make the more sustainable delivery choice
”,
Research in Transportation Economics
, Vol. 
103
, 101388, doi: .
Lazarević
,
D.
,
Popović
,
Đ.
,
Çodur
,
M.Y.
and
Dobrodolac
,
M.
(
2024
), “
Fuzzy logic approach for evaluating electromobility alternatives in last-mile delivery: Belgrade as a case study
”,
Energies
, Vol. 
17
No. 
24
, p.
6307
, doi: .
Lingkon
,
H.I.
and
Ali
,
S.I.
(
2024
),
Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Urban Last-Mile Delivery Modes: Environmental and Economic Impacts
,
IGI Global
,
Hershey, PA
, pp.
26
-
43
, doi: .
Mahmoodi
,
A.
,
Hashemi
,
L.
,
Laliberte
,
J.
and
Sajadi
,
S.M.
(
2025
), “
Optimizing energy and CO2 efficiency in last-mile delivery using hybrid fleet models
”,
Sustainable Futures
, Vol. 
10
, 101089, doi: .
Marsden
,
G.
and
Reardon
,
L.
(
2017
), “
Questions of governance: rethinking the study of transportation policy
”,
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
, Vol. 
101
, pp.
238
-
251
.
McHugh
,
M.L.
(
2012
), “
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
”,
Biochemia Medica
, Vol. 
22
No. 
3
, pp. 
276
-
282
, doi: .
Mogire
,
E.
,
Kilbourn
,
P.
and
Luke
,
R.
(
2025
), “
Last mile delivery technologies for electronic commerce: a bibliometric review
”,
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations
, Vol. 
23
No. 
1
, doi: .
Montero-Vega
,
M.
,
Estrada
,
M.
and
Thigulla
,
D.T.
(
2025
), “
Understanding the impact of socio-demographic differences on acceptance of last-mile delivery technologies: a comparative analysis
”,
Journal of Transport Geography
, Vol. 
126
, 104244, doi: .
Ninović
,
M.
,
Dobrodolac
,
M.
,
Bošković
,
S.
,
Dupljanin
,
Đ.
,
Lazarević
,
D.
and
Dumnić
,
S.
(
2025
), “
An extended FullEX method: an application to the selection of online orders distribution modes based on the shared economy
”,
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
, Vol. 
20
No. 
3
, p.
207
, doi: .
Oflaç
,
B.S.
and
Özcan
,
S.
(
2025
), “
Determinants of customers' intention to adopt last mile-attended service points
”,
Istanbul Business Research
, Vol. 
54
No. 
2
, pp. 
214
-
231
, doi: .
Page
,
M.J.
,
McKenzie
,
J.E.
,
Bossuyt
,
P.M.
,
Boutron
,
I.
,
Hoffmann
,
T.C.
,
Mulrow
,
C.D.
,
McGuinness
,
L.A.
,
Stewart
,
L.A.
,
Thomas
,
J.
,
Tricco
,
A.C.
,
Welch
,
V.A.
,
Whiting
,
P.
and
Moher
,
D.
(
2021
), “
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
”,
BMJ
, Vol.
372
No. 
n71
, n71.
Plazier
,
P.
,
Rauws
,
W.
,
Neef
,
R.
and
Buijs
,
P.
(
2024
), “
Towards sustainable last-mile logistics? Investigating the role of cooperation, regulation, and innovation in scenarios for 2035
”,
Research in Transportation Business and Management
, Vol. 
56
, 101198, doi: .
Polisetty
,
A.
,
Chakraborty
,
D.
,
Singu
,
H.B.
and
Behl
,
A.
(
2024
), “
Examining the relationship between pro-environmental consumption behaviour and hedonic and eudaimonic motivation
”,
Journal of Environmental Management
, Vol. 
359
, 121095, doi: .
Poudineh
,
R.
,
Sen
,
A.
and
Fattouh
,
B.
(
2018
), “Policies to promote renewables in the Middle East and North Africa's resource rich economies”, in
The Economics of Renewable Energy in the Gulf
,
Routledge
, pp. 
120
-
138
.
Prisco
,
A.
,
Troise
,
C.
,
Monge
,
F.
and
Giovando
,
G.
(
2025
), “
How food delivery service can be sustainable: some evidence from the Giusta delivery case
”,
British Food Journal
, Vol. 
127
No. 
1
, pp. 
363
-
386
, doi: .
Qasem
,
R.H.M.
and
Scholz
,
M.
(
2025
), “
Climate change impact on resources in the MENA region: a systematic and critical review
”,
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
, Vol. 
139
, 103936.
Raza
,
A.
,
Wicaksono
,
H.
and
Valilai
,
O.F.
(
2023
), “
Blockchain technologies for sustainable last mile delivery: investigating customer awareness and tendency using NFT reward mechanisms
”,
2023 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)
,
IEEE
, pp. 
0021
-
0026
.
Rodriguez-Palero
,
M.
,
Guadix Martín
,
J.
,
Muñoz-Díaz
,
M.-L.
and
Muñuzuri Sanz
,
J.
(
2025
), “Criteria for solving the problem for last-mile micro-depot locations in urban areas: a review”, in
Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies
,
Scopus
, Vol. 
239
, pp. 
506
-
512
, doi: .
Rosales
,
R.
and
Haarstad
,
H.
(
2023
), “
Governance challenges for urban logistics: lessons from three Norwegian cities
”,
Environmental Policy and Governance
, Vol. 
33
No. 
3
, pp. 
221
-
231
, doi: .
Rose
,
W.J.
,
Confente
,
I.
,
Peinkofer
,
S.T.
and
Russo
,
I.
(
2025
), “
Activating the consumer: toward more sustainable last‐mile delivery
”,
Journal of Business Logistics
, Vol. 
46
No. 
4
, e70041, doi: .
Saad
,
W.
and
Boussi
,
F.
(
2025
), “
Influence of information and communication technology, human development, military expenditures, and renewable energy on environmental quality in the Middle East and North Africa Region
”,
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
, Vol. 
9
No. 
3
, pp. 
773
-
805
, doi: .
Saldaña
,
J.
(
2021
),
Coding Techniques for Quantitative and Mixed Data
,
The Routledge Reviewer’s Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis
,
Abingdon
, pp.
151
-
160
.
Shaker
,
R.J.
,
Hussain
,
F.
,
Chakranarayan
,
V.
and
Jaber
,
F.A.
(
2025
), “
Optimizing last-mile logistics with digital twins and multi-agent learning: enhancing efficiency, customer satisfaction, and urban integration
”,
SN Computer Science
, Vol. 
6
No. 
8
, p.
980
, doi: .
Shehata
,
A.M.
(
2023
), “
Sustainable-oriented development for urban interface of historic centers
”,
Sustainability
, Vol. 
15
No. 
3
, p.
2792
, doi: .
Silvestri
,
B.
,
Ranieri
,
L.
,
Fanti
,
M.P.
,
Mangini
,
A.M.
and
Krendeleva
,
A.
(
2025
), “
Autonomous vehicles in last mile delivery: sustainable approaches in urban area
”,
Proceedings of the Summer School Francesco Turco
,
Scopus
,
available at:
 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105018613448&partnerID=40&md5=37f114a0f88f003be46ef6695378f6fd
Stern
,
P.C.
,
Dietz
,
T.
,
Abel
,
T.
,
Guagnano
,
G.A.
and
Kalof
,
L.
(
1999
), “
A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism
”,
Human Ecology Review
, pp.
81
-
97
.
Subrahmanyam
,
S.
(
2025
), “Data governance and privacy in smart cities”, in
Citizen-Centric Artificial Intelligence for Smart Cities
,
IGI Global Scientific Publishing
, pp. 
433
-
456
.
Sultan
,
M.A.
,
Kramberger
,
T.
,
Barakat
,
M.
and
Ali
,
A.H.
(
2023
), “
Barriers to applying last-mile logistics in the Egyptian market: an extension of the technology acceptance model
”,
Sustainability
, Vol. 
15
No. 
17
, doi: .
Tajudeen
,
R.A.
,
Jokotade
,
O.F.
,
Akintunde
,
F.A.
and
Olawale
,
J.I.
(
2025
), “
Peri-urban housing dynamics in Africa’s megacity fringe: evaluating the quality of residential elements along the Lagos-Ibadan corridor
”,
International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope
, Vol. 
6
No. 
4
, pp.
547
-
560
.
Taniguchi
,
E.
(
2015
), “City logistics for sustainable and liveable cities”, in
Green Logistics and Transportation: A Sustainable Supply Chain Perspective
,
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, pp. 
49
-
60
.
Tanyas
,
M.
and
Ozkanlisoy
,
O.
(
2025
), “
Designating optimal location of urban consolidation centres in the city of Istanbul: a triple-staged approach in the context of sustainable supply chain management
”,
Research in Transportation Economics
, Vol. 
114
, 101672, doi: .
Taye
,
A.H.
,
Sisay
,
K.B.
,
Abebe
,
A.A.
and
Bantider
,
A.
(
2025
), “
Numerical groundwater flow modeling under future climate change in the Central Rift Valley Lakes Basin, Ethiopia
”,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
, Vol. 
52
, 100115.
Thomas
,
R.W.
,
Ueltschy Murfield
,
M.L.
and
Ellram
,
L.M.
(
2022
), “
Leveraging sustainable supply chain information to alter last-mile delivery consumption: a social exchange perspective
”,
Sustainable Production and Consumption
, Vol. 
34
, pp. 
285
-
299
, doi: .
Turoń
,
K.
(
2025
), “
Sustainable urban mobility transitions–from policy uncertainty to the calmmobility paradigm
”,
Smart Cities
, Vol. 
8
No. 
5
, p.
164
, doi: .
Veličković
,
M.
,
Stojanović
,
Đ.
and
Knežević
,
K.
(
2025
), “
The potential and importance of environmental incentives in e-commerce
”,
Transportation Research Procedia
, Vol. 
83
, pp. 
28
-
34
, doi: .
Wanganoo
,
L.
and
Patil
,
A.
(
2020
), “
Preparing for the smart cities: IoT enabled last-mile delivery
”,
2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)
,
IEEE
, pp. 
1
-
6
.
Wodon
,
Q.
(
2023
), “
Education to climate change: a missing ingredient in climate action plans for MENA countries?
”,
Orient
, Vol. 
64
No. 
1
, pp. 
15
-
23
.
Wu
,
M.
,
Lin
,
A.S.Q.
and
Yuen
,
K.F.
(
2024
), “
The effects of motivated consumer innovativeness on consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots
”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
, Vol. 
81
, 104030, doi: .
Zami
,
M.S.
,
Qwaider
,
S.
,
Azhar
,
J.
,
Hassanain
,
M.A.
and
Delledonne
,
N.
(
2025
), “
Challenges of establishing sustainable logistics urban park in the Middle Eastern countries
”,
Urban Science
, Vol. 
9
No. 
12
, p.
510
, doi: .
Zhou
,
W.
,
Espahbod
,
S.
,
Shi
,
V.
and
Nketiah
,
E.
(
2025
), “
Understanding consumers' adoption behavior of driverless delivery vehicles: insights from the combined use of NCA and PLS-SEM
”,
Sustainability
, Vol. 
17
No. 
13
, p.
5730
, doi: .
El Oualidi
,
H.H.A.
and
Mharzi
,
H.
(
2025
), “Enhancing last-mile delivery efficiency through connected vehicle technology and collaborative logistics: a systematic”, in
Intersection of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Cutting-Edge Technologies: From Concepts to Applications in Smart Environment: ICAISE’2024
, Vol. 
1
No. 
1353
, p.
48
.
Published in Journal of International Logistics and Trade. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options