Many authoritative sources are calling for collaborative and integrated working to be used as a vehicle to obtain better value, levels of quality and service delivery. However, clients in the current economic climate may feel vulnerable about entering into arrangements built on collaborative working practices, which could be deemed as taking unnecessary risk. The effects of recent austerity on collaborative working are explored in this study, with particular emphasis on the positioning of trust within such relationships and its manifestation in practice. A qualitative research methodology approach is adopted through interviews with eight senior UK construction professionals. Findings from the research suggest that construction clients have returned to traditional competitive procurement methods based on lowest cost, seeking to reduce risk in their practices and maintain control in uncertain times. Perceptions of collaborative working have shifted within the austerity context, and individuals have responded with a quest for job security, which has in turn developed risk-averse work practices and affected the establishment of long-term collaborative relationships. Sceptical considerations of collaboration have re-emerged, the abuse of collaborative relationships for financial benefits and employing austerity as leverage. Further research is recommended to examine the repercussions of this shift in both practice and philosophy.
Article navigation
December 2014
Research Article|
December 01 2014
Partnering in practice: an analysis of collaboration and trust
Jason Challender, MSc, FRICS, FHEA, FAPM;
Jason Challender, MSc, FRICS, FHEA, FAPM
1
Director of Physical Resources, Leeds City College, Leeds, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Farrell, MSc, PhD, FRICS, FCIOB;
Peter Farrell, MSc, PhD, FRICS, FCIOB
2
Reader, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Fred Sherratt, BSc, PhD, MBEng
Fred Sherratt, BSc, PhD, MBEng
3
Senior Lecturer, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
March 05 2014
Accepted:
September 11 2014
Online ISSN: 1751-4312
Print ISSN: 1751-4304
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2014
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (2014) 167 (6): 255–264.
Article history
Received:
March 05 2014
Accepted:
September 11 2014
Citation
Challender J, Farrell P, Sherratt F (2014), "Partnering in practice: an analysis of collaboration and trust". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 167 No. 6 pp. 255–264, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.14.00002
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Bibliometrics and visualisation of research on trust in construction projects
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (May,2020)
A contract manager abroad: cultural awareness in Asia
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (October,2015)
Managing uncertainty in fast-track construction projects: case study from South Africa
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (March,2020)
A cognitive approach to trust management in construction
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (October,2013)
Enhancing off-site manufacturing through early contractor involvement (ECI) in New Zealand
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (January,2018)
Related Chapters
Sourcing from Multinational Suppliers to Overcome Weak Contracting Institutions and Gain Supply Chain Capabilities
Geography, Location, and Strategy
Conclusion: Sustainable Mentoring in Academia for and Beyond the SDGs
Mentoring Within and Beyond Academia: Achieving the SDGs
Updating and Cleaning Out: The “Make or Buy” Decision in Construction Revisited
10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
