Increasingly, authorities put major infrastructure projects centre-stage in their plans and strategies and invest scarce resources in them; indeed, the number and scale of projects is increasing. It therefore matters that they achieve their objectives, for if they do not, what then? This paper considers the evidence for urban rail (metro) systems drawing on the author’s experience and research supplemented by published evidence. Too often, these projects fall short, particularly in delivering operational success. The weak link in project development is shown to be the pre-implementation planning phase, particularly the early days. This is when decisions have major downstream implications and unless well informed and managed result in consequential inevitable problems. This paper identifies issues with common practice and defines a practical agenda for planning improvement. Often, this requires a greater investment in planning effort and deferring commitment to a project until this decision can be made with confidence. The prescriptions recommended are shown to have much in common with insights from a report by the UK National Audit Office, subsequently addressed. Finally, this paper considers their relevance to the UK’s major infrastructure project – HS2, which is a different scale of investment – and finds that they are likely to be relevant.
Article navigation
September 2015
Editors
Research Article|
September 01 2015
Pre-implementation planning – the weak link in rail projects
Roger James Allport, BSc, MA, PhD, DIC, FICE
Roger James Allport, BSc, MA, PhD, DIC, FICE
Director
Allport Associates Ltd, Richmond, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
April 03 2015
Accepted:
July 15 2015
Online ISSN: 1751-4312
Print ISSN: 1751-4304
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2015
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (2015) 168 (5): 205–212.
Article history
Received:
April 03 2015
Accepted:
July 15 2015
Citation
Allport RJ (2015), "Pre-implementation planning – the weak link in rail projects". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 168 No. 5 pp. 205–212, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.15.00010
Download citation file:
625
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
The impact of smart city technologies: lessons from three UK cities
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (September,2019)
Quantifying net benefits of intervention programmes to enable their digitalised generation
Infrastructure Asset Management (June,2021)
Defining road service to facilitate road infrastructure asset management
Infrastructure Asset Management (September,2019)
A Bayesian network model to predict accidents on Swiss highways
Infrastructure Asset Management (December,2015)
Estimating, and setting targets for, the resilience of transport infrastructure
Infrastructure Asset Management (July,2021)
Related Chapters
The value-based decision-making process: An overview
Whole-Life Value-Based Decision-Making in Asset Management
Stage A: Establish the context
Whole-Life Value-Based Decision-Making in Asset Management
Stage B: Develop the value map
Whole-Life Value-Based Decision-Making in Asset Management
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
