A systems integration model for the delivery of complex infrastructure projects is proposed. From the Crossrail case, the authors draw seven lessons for clients to: (1) manage programme delivery as an integration activity; (2) actively manage systems integration; (3) ensure authority to make decisions; (4) maintain configuration control; (5) plan for a lengthy testing and commissioning phase; (6) appreciate supply chain products that may be part of unaligned global research and development programmes; and (7) do final integration only when there is something to integrate. Central to the argument is the idea that on such complex projects, the client cannot outsource systems integration and thus needs to recognise they retain accountability, though roles and responsibilities can be assigned to the delivery partner, supply chain, chief engineer and/or contracted systems integration firm. A key question for the client at the outset is how to distribute interface management and systems integration responsibilities while retaining accountability and oversight. Rather than managing through contracts, budgets and schedules, the authors suggest a changed approach with priority given to managing integration, and contracts, budgets and schedules that support and incentivise this.
Article navigation
1 August 2022
Research Article|
January 10 2022
Systems integration in infrastructure projects: seven lessons from Crossrail Available to Purchase
Jennifer Whyte, BA (Hons) MA (Cambridge), PhD, FICE
;
Centre for Systems Engineering and Innovation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
(corresponding author: j.whyte@imperial.ac.uk)
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew Davies, BA (Hons), MA, DPhil (Sussex), HonFAPM
;
Andrew Davies, BA (Hons), MA, DPhil (Sussex), HonFAPM
Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School, Brighton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Chris Sexton, BA (Hons) MA (Oxon) FInstRE FCQI
Chris Sexton, BA (Hons) MA (Oxon) FInstRE FCQI
Cambridgeshire Autonomous Metro, Ely, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
(corresponding author: j.whyte@imperial.ac.uk)
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
May 12 2021
Accepted:
October 07 2021
Online ISSN: 1751-4312
Print ISSN: 1751-4304
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2022
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (2022) 175 (3): 103–109.
Article history
Received:
May 12 2021
Accepted:
October 07 2021
Citation
Whyte J, Davies A, Sexton C (2022), "Systems integration in infrastructure projects: seven lessons from Crossrail". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 175 No. 3 pp. 103–109, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.21.00014
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Developmental intervention impact on project environments
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (May,2012)
Engineering innovations in Canada’s public–private partnerships
Infrastructure Asset Management (July,2018)
A cognitive approach to trust management in construction
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (October,2013)
Briefing: Can alliance contracts provide a delivery platform for greater collaboration with building information modelling?
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (November,2019)
Briefing: Provisional sums: practical use under the Fidic Yellow Book
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (August,2015)
Related Chapters
Conclusion and Key Points
Early Contractor Involvement: Improving the Management of Contract Risk
Operational management
Highway Bridge Management
Civil engineering projects
Civil Engineering Procedure
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
