The paper examines the disclosure of information within public contract awards under EU law. EU Public Procurement rules have several objectives that may at some times be conflicting with each other. A certain level of transparency of public procurement procedure is necessary in order to fight corruption, enhance trade opportunities and ensure effective legal remedies. On the other hand, too much transparency may have certain anti-competitive effects. The national laws regarding disclosure of information vary in different EU member states. In Finland the EU law principle of effective remedies has been interpreted as requiring full transparency among the bidders. The transparency rules under EU law and certain Member States' national laws are analysed. As a conclusion, it is suggested that the rules on disclosure should not be left solely to the discretion of member states as the over-transparent approach taken by certain member states may negatively affect the markets both on a national and EU level.
Article navigation
1 April 2017
Research Article|
April 01 2017
Disclosure rules in eu public procurement: Balancing between competition and transparency Available to Purchase
Kirsi-Maria Halonen
Kirsi-Maria Halonen
University Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, Finland
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2150-6930
Print ISSN: 1535-0118
Copyright © 2016 by PrAcademics Press
2016
licensed reuse rights only
Journal of Public Procurement (2017) 16 (4): 528–553.
Citation
Halonen K (2017), "Disclosure rules in eu public procurement: Balancing between competition and transparency". Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 16 No. 4 pp. 528–553, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-16-04-2016-B005
Download citation file:
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
