Skip to article sections

Three typographical errors appeared in this paper when it was published in Structures and Buildings165(3): 127–138, http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2012.165.3.127.

The second author's first name should have been given as Ravindra K. Dhir.

Two values in Table 3 were incorrect, the table with corrected values (emboldened) appears below.

Data & Figures

Table 3.

Study details and comparison of maximum pressures with respect to hydrostatic pressures for SCCs (selective literature)

ReferenceElement no. and type Pour height: m*Additions or fillers in SCCSlump flow: mmConcrete rate of rise: m/hMaximum pressure: kN/m2Maximum pressure/hydrostatic pressure: %
Bernabeu (2000)8W2·1–7·5LS620–8006·0–120·032·5–111·529–100
 5C2·2–5·0LS580–89010·0–150·046·0–114·583–100
 3C5·0LS720–89011·0–60·0110·5–120·596–105
Proske and Graubner (2002)5C4·0FA550–75025–6040·0–90·043–97
Billberg (2003)7W2·9LS650–7800·8–2·312·5–49·534–77
Leemann and Hoffmann (2003)3C2·6FA570–6608·050·5–52·087–90
 1W3·9FA70018·897·0110
Vanhove et al. (2004)1C10·4LS70010·3175·574
 1C10·4LS70024·0188·580
Fedroff and Frosch (2004)2W3·4FA660–7101·221·0, 26·034, 37
Tejeda-Dominguez et al. (2005)1W7·9FA600–7401·238·524
 1C2·9FA600–74018·354·579
Assaad and Khayat (2006)2C2·8FA/SF540, 74510·049·5, 58·0 88, 94
Cauberg and Desmyter (2007)3C3·8NA685–81010·069·0–85·085–97

* Height from top of element to lowest pressure measurement point; C: column; W: wall (using CIRIA 108 definition).

Involved a retarder.

Shaded areas: Pumping from below, except one case (Bernabeu, 2000) when the discharge pipe was kept under SCC level during the pour.

SF: silica fume; NA: information not available.

Contents

Supplements

References

Languages

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options