Article navigation
Purpose

Employees' covert and unethical expediency at work is detrimental to the sustainable performance development of service industries. However, the limited understanding of the antecedents of employee expediency complicates efforts to develop effective coping approaches. Leveraging cognitive appraisal theory of emotion, this study aims to examine how illegitimate tasks fuel service employees' unethical expedient behaviors through the mediating role of workplace anxiety and the moderating role of polychronicity.

Design/methodology/approach

We conducted a scenario-based experiment of 232 full-time employees in service organizations and a time-lagged field study of 223 frontline service employees. Hierarchical regression analyses were employed for data analysis.

Findings

Service employees undertaking more illegitimate tasks experience greater workplace anxiety, which serves as an emotional catalyst for expedient behaviors. Moreover, polychronicity weakens the effect of illegitimate tasks on workplace anxiety as well as the indirect effect of illegitimate tasks on employee expediency via workplace anxiety.

Originality/value

Given the prevalence of illegitimate tasks in service organizations, our study underscores the detriments of illegitimate tasks and advance the growing literature in employee expediency.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options