Strategy documents are used across different industries to communicate the envisioned direction of a system or organisation. In recent years, a range of strategy documents relating to the UK rail sector have been produced, including European publications and the UK's Rail Technical Strategy. However, such documents are written by a multitude of stakeholders and can vary noticeably in structure, content and style. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the perceived quality and value of strategy documents can also be variable. This paper presents a study of three prominent railway documents, using information modelling and a user evaluation exercise. The findings show that inconsistent approaches to producing strategy can result in documents of varying quality and usefulness. The implications of poorly communicating strategy, it is suggested, are significant and far-reaching. The work supports a broader research project towards a new systems approach to designing strategy.
Article navigation
October 2016
Research Article|
July 14 2016
A systems study of influential railway strategy documents Available to Purchase
Rhianne Evans, PhD;
Rhianne Evans, PhD
Research Fellow
BCRRE, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK (corresponding author: R.S.Evans@bham.ac.uk)
Search for other works by this author on:
Clive Roberts, PhD;
Clive Roberts, PhD
Director
BCRRE, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Felix Schmid, PhD
Felix Schmid, PhD
Director of Education
BCRRE, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
January 29 2016
Accepted:
June 07 2016
Online ISSN: 1751-7710
Print ISSN: 0965-092X
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2016
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (2016) 169 (5): 272–282.
Article history
Received:
January 29 2016
Accepted:
June 07 2016
Citation
Evans R, Roberts C, Schmid F (2016), "A systems study of influential railway strategy documents". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, Vol. 169 No. 5 pp. 272–282, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.16.00023
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Briefing: Crossrail
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (May,2008)
Estimating the profitability of the British east coast main line
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (June,2013)
Business models in rail infrastructure: explaining innovation
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (August,2016)
HS2 railway, UK – the hybrid bill
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (January,2019)
HS2 railway, UK – why the country needs it
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (January,2019)
Related Chapters
Was Tocqueville Wrong? Buzz as Charisma, Creativity, and Glamour; New Sources of Political Legitimacy Supplementing Voting, and Civic Participation
Can Tocqueville Karaoke? Global Contrasts of Citizen Participation, the Arts and Development
European Tourism Policy
Knowledge Management in Tourism: Policy and Governance Applications
Connectivity Public Policy in the Network Society: The Case of “WiFi Livre SP”
Communication and Information Technologies Annual: Digital Empowerment: Opportunities and Challenges of Inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
