Open figure viewer
Khansari ER, Tabibi M and Moghadas Nejad F (2017) Lane-based car-following behaviour based on inductive loops. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Transport 170(1): 38–45, https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.15.00110.
In Tables 2–5 the directions of the greater than and less than symbols are incorrect; the corrected tables are as follows.
Table 2.
Comparison between lane 1 and lane 2 in the congested condition
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 1 > lane 2 | Lane 1 < lane 2 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −305·9 | 3·628 |
| T-value | −12·18 | 11·72 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 11 149 | 11 039 |
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 1 > lane 2 | Lane 1 < lane 2 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −305·9 | 3·628 |
| T-value | −12·18 | 11·72 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 11 149 | 11 039 |
Table 3.
Comparison between lane 2 and lane 3 in the congested condition
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 2 > lane 3 | Lane 2 < lane 3 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −532·4 | 14·420 |
| T-value | −14·08 | 45·57 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 4543 | 6619 |
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 2 > lane 3 | Lane 2 < lane 3 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −532·4 | 14·420 |
| T-value | −14·08 | 45·57 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 4543 | 6619 |
Table 4.
Comparison between lane 1 and lane 2 in the non-congested condition
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 1 > lane 2 | Lane 1 < lane 2 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −443·5 | 11·727 |
| T-value | −18·07 | 102·75 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 21 693 | 20 899 |
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 1 > lane 2 | Lane 1 < lane 2 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −443·5 | 11·727 |
| T-value | −18·07 | 102·75 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 21 693 | 20 899 |
Table 5.
Comparison between lane 2 and lane 3 in the non-congested condition
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 2 > lane 3 | Lane 2 < lane 3 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −857·8 | 10·674 |
| T-value | −22·18 | 43·62 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 5159 | 4422 |
| Parameter | Time headway | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative hypothesis | Lane 2 > lane 3 | Lane 2 < lane 3 |
| Confidence level | 95% | 95% |
| Estimate for difference | −857·8 | 10·674 |
| T-value | −22·18 | 43·62 |
| P-value | 0·000 | 0·000 |
| Degree of freedom | 5159 | 4422 |
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2019
