The case evolves around the Powerball lottery and the rule changes implemented in 2015, which, among other things, changed the chances of winning the jackpot from 1 in 175 million to 1 in 292 million. What is the impact of such rules on lottery revenues? The expected value rule is unable to explain why people play in the first place and fails to give the appropriate weight to the factors that explain the attractiveness of a lottery. This case is ideal to introduce the notion of decision weights as put forward by Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory. By calculating decision weights, we obtain a reasonable prediction for the willingness to pay for the lottery as a function of different jackpot amounts. Using past data, we can correlate lottery revenues with predicted willingness to pay for a ticket. Quantitative-inclined audiences can then develop a simulation model of how likely it is that the jackpot grows, which, coupled with the prediction of revenues as a function of the jackpot, would give the evolution of the revenues under the new rule. The accompanying spreadsheet provides data for students to work out various scenarios to narrow objectives and maximize revenue from Powerball tickets.
Article navigation
Case Study|
April 23 2024
Powerball: Somebody's Gotta Win!
Manel Baucells
Manel Baucells
Associate Professor of Business Administration
Search for other works by this author on:
This public-sourced case was prepared by Gerry Yemen, Senior Researcher; and Manel Baucells, Associate Professor of Business Administration. The protagonist and situation are fictionalized. It was written as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
July 23 2020
Revision Received:
April 02 2024
Online ISSN: 2474-7890
Copyright © 2017 by the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville, VA. All rights reserved.
2017
University of Virginia Darden School Foundation
Licensed re-use rights only. To order copies, send an e-mail to sales@dardenbusinesspublishing.com. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of the Darden School Foundation. Our goal is to publish materials of the highest quality, so please submit any errata to editorial@dardenbusinesspublishing.com.
Darden Business Publishing Cases 1–6.
Article history
Received:
July 23 2020
Revision Received:
April 02 2024
Connected Content
Case study:
Powerball: Somebody's Gotta Win!
See also
-
relatedCaseResource
Citation
Yemen G, Baucells M (2024;), "Powerball: Somebody's Gotta Win!". Darden Business Publishing Cases, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/case.darden.2024.000857
Download citation file:
Email Alerts
Suggested Reading
Powerball: Somebody's Gotta Win!
Teaching Notes (April,2024)
Stock loan lotteries and individual investor welfare
Review of Behavioral Finance (August,2020)
Peter Leheup: “an odious character”
Library Review (September,1995)
Possibility‐Probability Transformation: A New Result via Information Theory of Deterministic Functions
Kybernetes (July,1994)
A simple method of determining moments of a top event
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (July,1996)
Related Chapters
Prospect Theory and its Applications to the Modelling of Travel Choice
Bounded Rational Choice Behaviour: Applications in Transport
Paradox? What Paradox? On a Brief Correspondence Between Leonard Savage and Karl Popper
Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on Sir James Steuart: The Political Economy of Money and Trade
Paradox and Quantum Mechanics: Implications for the Management of Organizational Paradox from a Quantum Approach
Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Learning from Belief and Science, Part A
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
