This case is designed to present students with the challenges of formulating a discounted-cash-flow (DCF) analysis for a strategically important capital-investment decision. Analytically, the problem is representative of most corporate investment decisions, but it is particularly interesting because of the massive size of the American Centrifuge Project and the potential of the project to significantly affect the stock price. Students must determine the relevant cash flows, paying close attention to the treatment of input costs, selling prices, timing of investment outlays, depreciation, and inflation. An important input is the appropriate cost of uranium, which some students argue should be included at book value, while others argue that market value should be used. Although the primary objective of the case is to focus on the estimation of cash flows, students are provided with a straightforward set of inputs to estimate USEC's weighted average cost of capital. The case is designed for students who are learning, or need a refresher on, DCF analysis. Because of the basic issues covered, the case works well with undergraduate, MBA, and executive-education audiences. The case also affords the opportunity to explore a variety of issues related to capital-investment analysis, including relevant costs, incremental analysis, cost of capital, and sensitivity analysis. The case is an excellent example of the value of a firm as the value of assets in place plus the net present value of future growth opportunities.
Article navigation
Case Study|
January 20 2017
Usec Inc. Available to Purchase
This case was written by Ben Mackovjak (MBA '07) and Lucas Doe (MBA/ME '04) under the supervision of Professor Kenneth Eades, as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation.
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Copyright © 2007 by the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville, VA. All rights reserved.
2007
University of Virginia Darden School Foundation
Licensed re-use rights only. To order copies, send an e-mail to sales@dardenbusinesspublishing.com. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of the Darden School Foundation.
Darden Business Publishing Cases 1–11.
Connected Content
Case study:
Usec Inc.
See also
-
relatedCaseResource
Citation
Eades KM, Mackovjak B, Doe L (2017;), "Usec Inc.". Darden Business Publishing Cases, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/case.darden.2016.000337
Download citation file:
Email Alerts
Suggested Reading
Usec Inc.
Teaching Notes (January,2017)
Aurora Textile Company
Darden Business Publishing Cases (January,2017)
Aurora Textile Company
Teaching Notes (January,2017)
The UK Companies Act of 2006, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, and important reviews of 2009: Implications for the certainty equivalent coefficient net present value criterion
International Journal of Law and Management (November,2010)
A review of the capital budgeting behaviour of large South African firms
Meditari Accountancy Research (April,2005)
Related Chapters
Stock Valuation Using the Dividend Discount Model: An Internal Rate of Return Approach
Growing Presence of Real Options in Global Financial Markets
An Options Approach to the Project Activation Decision in the Aerospace Industry
Overlaps of Private Sector with Public Sector around the Globe
Impact of Framed Information and Project Importance on Capital Budgeting Decisions
Advances in Management Accounting
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
