Article navigation
Purpose

This conceptual paper addresses the growing concern of leadership accountability and power asymmetries in AI-integrated organizations. It proposes a structured framework to navigate the ethical, institutional and technical blind spots that often go unnoticed in AI governance.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from leadership studies, AI ethics and organizational governance, the paper synthesizes insights to propose a novel theoretical framework (“CARE”) for responsible AI oversight.

Findings

The study identifies three dimensions of leadership negligence, technical, ethical and institutional, that create accountability gaps and obscure power dynamics in AI systems. The CARE Framework (Control, Awareness, Responsibility and Evaluation) guides leaders in assessing and addressing these gaps across different sectors.

Originality/value

This paper contributes a practical, theory-informed model for ethical AI leadership and provides a foundation for future empirical studies. It bridges fragmented discussions across disciplines and informs both scholars and practitioners aiming to implement trustworthy, power-aware AI systems.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal