The theory of monopoly price was originally formulated by Carl Menger at the inception of the marginalist revolution in 1871 and represented the dominant theoretical approach to monopoly until the 1930s. Despite its impeccable doctrinal pedigree and lengthy dominance, the theory abruptly disappeared from the mainstream neoclassical literature after the Monopolistic Competition Revolution, to be revived and reformulated after World War II by Ludwig von Mises. The present paper describes the theory as it was offered in its most sophisticated pre‐war form by American economist Vernon A. Mund, who published an unjustifiably neglected volume on monopoly theory that appeared in the same year as the classic works by Joan Robinson and Edward Chamberlain. This paper then attempts to draw out the critical implications of Mund’s formulation of the theory for the current neoclassical orthodoxy in monopoly and competition theory, including the elasticity of demand curves facing individual producers under competition, the time perspectives that are most relevant in analyzing the pricing process, the proper role of long‐run equilibrium in this analysis, and the misapplication of the marginal revenue and marginal cost concepts. Finally, the paper suggests a number of reasons why the theory was swept aside in the aftermath of the Chamberlain/Robinson Revolution with almost no resistance from its most prominent exponents.
Article navigation
1 February 2004
Conceptual Paper|
February 01 2004
Menger’s theory of monopoly price in the years of high theory: the contribution of Vernon A. Mund Available to Purchase
Joseph T. Salerno
Joseph T. Salerno
Lubin School of Business, Pace University, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7743
Print ISSN: 0307-4358
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Managerial Finance (2004) 30 (2): 72–92.
Citation
Salerno JT (2004), "Menger’s theory of monopoly price in the years of high theory: the contribution of Vernon A. Mund". Managerial Finance, Vol. 30 No. 2 pp. 72–92, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350410768912
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Comments on Frederic M. Scherer’s “Heinrich von Stackelberg’s Marktform und Gleichgewicht”
Journal of Economic Studies (December,1996)
About a dispute of some time ago: Umberto Ricci vs Attilio da Empoli
Journal of Economic Studies (August,2001)
von Stackelberg’s equilibria for Bertrand‐Edgeworth duopoly with buyouts
Journal of Economic Studies (December,1996)
A theory of clearance sales
Strategic Direction (December,2007)
Heinrich von Stackelberg’s Marktform und Gleichgewicht
Journal of Economic Studies (December,1996)
Related Chapters
Challenges for Government as Facilitator and Umpire of Innovation in Urban Transport: The View from Australia
Shaping Smart Mobility Futures: Governance and Policy Instruments in times of Sustainability Transitions
Value-based Selling in the Service-dominated Business Landscape: Creating, Acting, and Organizing to Improve Customer’s Profits
Organizing Marketing and Sales: Mastering Contemporary B2B Challenges
The Integration of History and Strategy Research
History and Strategy
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
