Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to make a critical review of the voluminous empirical literature on risk disclosure.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper has conducted a detailed analysis of the nature and the content of selected studies published in well-reputed journals during the period 2000–2020.

Findings

The systematic analysis reveals that majority of risks represented by operational, strategic, environmental, social, governance, information processing and technology, damage and integrity, etc. are considered as non-financial and reflects three main streams of research as determinants of the disclosures, disclosure’s practices and adoption of disclosures’ regulation.

Practical implications

This review analysis makes a novel contribution to literature by offering certain policy implications for non-financial risk disclosure practices applied by companies during a historical period, characterised by uncertainties, that called for a gear change in the consideration and management of non-financial risks.

Originality/value

This study makes a novel contribution to literature by summarising the voluminous empirical literature arranged on physical risk disclosure.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal