Sophisticated 5 choice multiple items of the type described below are common in ‘A’ level pure science examinations but less popular in Applied variety. One reason might be that it is more difficult to devise plausible distractors for multiple choice items on Nutrition and Pharmacology. In pure Chemistry the vast scope of factual material and theoretical nature of the subject allows the item writer a freer rein. Most graphs describing experimental data, most alternative solutions to mathematical problems and most of the reactions of a hypothetical element ‘X’ are inherently plausible until the examinee has realised the point of the question. During the course of devising sophisticated ‘multiple completion’ and ‘assertion‐reason’ items for use in Food Science I found considerable difficulty in devising satisfactory items with key D for ‘multiple completion’ (only response No 4 is correct) and key E for the ‘assertion‐reason’ (both assertion and reason are false). This led to the conclusion that it might be desirable to modify the style of the ‘sophisticated’ items and convert them to a 4 choice format. This has little effect on the ‘multiple choice items’ and the ‘classification sets’ but proved positively beneficial with the remaining two types. By eliminating option ‘D’ from the ‘multiple completion items’ and merging options D and E in the ‘assertion‐reason’ a better balanced examination paper emerged. The relative proportions of A, B, C, D, E as the keys to a multiple choice test should of course reflect the laws of averages and not the relative ease of constructing items. There is, however, very little merit in putting very easy items in a test simply to ‘balance up’ the numbers. Appended below are instructions for a practice test using the sophisticated modified items. The author also possesses a 40 item experimental examination paper in the same format with all the items devised by himself (to avoid copyright problems) which he is prepared to circulate for pre‐testing, validation, and so on.
Article navigation
1 May 1981
Review Article|
May 01 1981
More multiple choice
Michael Akeroyd MA
Michael Akeroyd MA
Lecturer at Bradford College
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6917
Print ISSN: 0034-6659
© MCB UP Limited
1981
Nutrition & Food Science (1981) 81 (5): 20–21.
Citation
Akeroyd MA M (1981), "More multiple choice". Nutrition & Food Science, Vol. 81 No. 5 pp. 20–21, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb058865
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Validation of design and materials for additive manufacturing of endocavitary mechanical distractor
Rapid Prototyping Journal (January,2022)
Design and evaluation of an ontology-based tool for generating multiple-choice questions
Interactive Technology and Smart Education (February,2020)
Boosting visual servoing performance through RGB-based methods
Robotic Intelligence and Automation (July,2023)
Preparation of porous Mn-doped CuO microplates and enhanced adsorption performance
Surface Innovations (September,2017)
Make context easier: enhancing fine-tuned NER models via LLM-based text rewriting
The Electronic Library (May,2026)
Related Chapters
29 Framatome's multiple examination device and on-site removable fuel rods examination stand
Post-irradiation examination
TAAF Framework Phase III: Item-Level Performance
Global Perspectives on Educational Testing: Examining Fairness, High-Stakes and Policy Reform
Social Conservatism, Distractors, and Authoritarianism: Axiological Versus Instrumental Rationality
Mediations of Social Life in the 21st Century
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
