Design studio courses take place at the core of education disciplinary design such as architecture and interior architecture. Studios in which design studio courses are conducted can also be used for other practical courses as well. Another important feature of these studios is that they are extensively used by students for individual or group work other than during class hours. Since the students, either on their own or with the project coordinator, experience design process in these studios, their spatial characteristics are highly significant to conduct this process effectively. Within this scope, the aim of the research is to evaluate open and cell type studios commonly used in traditional architecture education through Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) approach, to discuss to what extent these studios meet the spatial requirements of today’s instructional methods and to develop a suggestion for design studio spatial use by taking the strengths and weaknesses of these studios. Accordingly, technical, physical and behavioral variables determining the performance of design studios within the context of spatial requirements have been identified through reviewing the related literature. In framework of a case study, a survey formed with the aforementioned variables was administered to architecture and interior architecture students studying in open and cell type design studios in order to measure their spatial performance. Followingly, in the final part of the study, referring to survey results and evaluation of spatial requirements of today’s instructional methods and tools, a combi design studio space organization has been suggested.
Article navigation
1 March 2016
Research Article|
March 01 2016
Performance Evaluation of Open and Cell Type Design Studios Available to Purchase
Umut Tuğlu Karsli
Umut Tuğlu Karsli
Doğuş University, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design
, Acibadem, Kadikoy, 34722, Istanbul, Turkey
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2633-9838
Print ISSN: 0168-2601
© 2016 Open House International
2016
Licensed re-use rights only.
Open House International (2016) 41 (1): 27–34.
Citation
Karsli UT (2016), "Performance Evaluation of Open and Cell Type Design Studios". Open House International, Vol. 41 No. 1 pp. 27–34, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2016-B0004
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Collaborative architectural design studio environment: An experiment in the studio of Architectural Design-I
Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research (September,2019)
Pedagogy of Architectural Education on Sustainability in Malaysia – Student Perspective
Open House International (December,2016)
An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak
Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research (December,2020)
Warming-Up Exercises in Support of Open Building Education
Open House International (June,2006)
Reflections on studio-based learning: assessment and critique
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology (February,2018)
Related Chapters
Duck, It’s a Raven! Writing Stirring Stories with Andersen’s Sinister Shadow
Consumer Culture Theory
Photogrammetry as a Digital Tool for Heritage Buildings Documentation and Modeling in Architectural Education
AI in Modern Architecture and Design: Insights, Applications, New Openings
The Tree of Architecture Revisited, Rethought, and Rejected: Decolonising Architectural Education
Innovations in Decolonising the Curriculum: Multidisciplinary Perspectives
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
