A study which explores the relationship between law enforcement intelligence and social research. The author argues that because law enforcement intelligence draws heavily upon the use of research methodologies, analysts employed in the field can benefit from the knowledge and skills of social scientists. The study compares some of the most frequently used qualitative data collection methods and analytic techniques employed by intelligence analysts with those of the social scientist. The study concludes that providing tertiary education in social research methods for law enforcement intelligence personnel, or alternatively, recruiting social scientists as analysts would be most beneficial, and points to similar positive situations experienced by the CIA in its exchange program with various universities.
Article navigation
1 March 1996
This article was originally published in
Police Studies: Intnl Review of Police Development
Review Article|
March 01 1996
The intelligent analyst as social scientist: a comparison of research methods Available to Purchase
Henry W. Prunckun
Henry W. Prunckun
Courts Administration Authority, South Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2054-5630
Print ISSN: 0141-2949
© MCB UP Limited
1996
Police Studies: Intnl Review of Police Development (1996) 19 (3): 67–80.
Citation
Prunckun HW (1996), "The intelligent analyst as social scientist: a comparison of research methods". Police Studies: Intnl Review of Police Development, Vol. 19 No. 3 pp. 67–80, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004478
Download citation file:
189
Views
Suggested Reading
American Black Women in the Arts and Social Sciences (3rd edition, revised and enlarged)
Reference Reviews (August,2003)
Making organisational ethnography
Journal of Organizational Ethnography (April,2012)
The Library of Congress Country Studies
Electronic Resources Review (May,1999)
Social Science Electronic Data Library
Reference Reviews (December,2004)
The Social Sciences: A Cross‐disciplinary Guide to Selected Sources (3rd edition)
Reference Reviews (March,2003)
Related Chapters
Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
