Increasingly, rigorous market research is being seen as a necessary prerequisite to the successful and profitable construction and disposal of property developments. Norton, for example, stresses that, with the demand for accommodation in most market sectors being already reasonably well met, only a thorough and detailed understanding of the market will ensure that new schemes compete with and complement existing developments rather than merely duplicating them. The penalties of inadequate market research are heavy: projects are difficult to finance because funders remain to be convinced that there is a demand for the floorspace proposed; completed developments stand vacant because the accommodation provided does not meet the design, site or location requirements of potential occupiers. Even in areas, such as Berkshire, with relatively healthy local economies and continuing demand for premises, record levels of vacant floorspace, much of it modern, exist alongside record rental levels. The property industry appears not to have absorbed this lesson. Cadman and Cleaveley suggest that too many development decisions have been taken on the basis of ‘hunches’ or ‘gut feeling’ or because a similar project has been successfully developed elsewhere, rather than being taken in the light of adequate market analysis. Consequently, it is suggested that the surveying profession needs to show much greater interest in property market research and analysis and this paper has been written in an attempt to widen discussion on the subject. The vehicle chosen is a consideration of the high technology market and, more specifically, the difficulties encountered in trying to define that market. It is hoped that a detailed rather than a generalised approach will better illustrate the practical advantages and limitations of market research. The particular market sector was chosen because science parks and high technology developments are cited by Cleaveley as specific examples of projects which have been built without the benefit of adequate market research.
Article navigation
1 January 1987
Review Article|
January 01 1987
PROPERTY MARKET DEFINITION: A FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-731X
Print ISSN: 0263-7472
© MCB UP Limited
1987
Property Management (1987) 5 (1): 35–42.
Citation
Henneberry J (1987), "PROPERTY MARKET DEFINITION: A FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM". Property Management, Vol. 5 No. 1 pp. 35–42, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb006643
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Space‐time management and office floorspace demand: Applied experience and mathematical simulations
Journal of Corporate Real Estate (February,2007)
Commercial property tax in the UK: business rates and rating appeals
Journal of Property Investment & Finance (September,2016)
LONDON COMMERCIAL OFFICE SPACE SURVEY: A SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT
Journal of Valuation (February,1983)
Managing public floors in private development: perceptions and challenges
Property Management (October,2024)
Hypermarkets Superstores — Saturation or future growth?
Retail and Distribution Management (April,1982)
Related Chapters
Monitoring city-scale land use development using new online sources—the case of Beijing
Transforming the Future of Infrastructure through Smarter Information: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and ConstructionConstruction, 27–29 June 2016
EXTERNALISATION THE BERKSHIRE EXPERIENCE OF COMPULSORY COMPETITIVE TENDERING
Incorporated Engineers and Technicians 1995 National Conference Tomorrow's engineers today - papers
“They Saw an Arrest”: Situation Definition, Polarization, and Affect Control Theory
Advances in Group Processes
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
