This study aims to introduce a comprehensive internal framework designed to ensure the integrity of courses, programs, and assessments within the science faculty of a university.
This study utilized a case study methodology, using semi-structured interviews, document analysis and observations. Data from structured departmental and faculty meetings, student consultations, benchmarking reports and feedback loops informed the development and evaluation of the framework.
The framework’s implementation has resulted in student satisfaction exceeding 90%, reflecting positive feedback on the quality, diversity and fairness of assessments and teaching practices. Lecturer satisfaction exceeds 75%, driven by autonomy, professional development and adoption of reflective teaching strategies. Errors in assessments have decreased by 95%, highlighting the effectiveness of the standardized checklist and rigorous review processes. The faculty, along with its Examination Quality Assurance Committee, fosters a culture of shared governance for maintaining academic integrity and improving assessments. Program alignment with international standards has facilitated global partnerships. In addition, the framework reduces logistical inefficiencies and reliance on external examiners.
This study introduces an innovative internally structured framework as a viable alternative to the external examiner system, offering a replicable model for broader adoption.
