Quality assurance in higher education has been a subject of much interest and debate among academics, management of higher educational institutions, and the funding bodies, for some time now. Almost every higher educational institution has adopted some form of student evaluation mechanism as a part of this drive for quality assurance. This paper argues that evaluation systems existing in many institutions are not specific enough to provide useful guidelines for staff and management to improve on their provision. Many evaluation systems the authors have come across are too general, being institution‐wide, standard questionnaires which fail to provide much insight into how students evaluate instructor‐related factors and module‐specific factors. Under these circumstances, the objective of this paper is to present a model of instructor and module evaluation as a guideline for the development of more focused student evaluations within the context of marketing education.
Article navigation
1 March 1999
Case Report|
March 01 1999
Modelling module evaluation in marketing education
D. Palihawadana;
D. Palihawadana
D. Palihawadana is Senior Lecturer in Marketing, Leeds Business School, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
George Holmes
George Holmes
George Holmes is Deputy Vice‐Chancellor, University of North London, London, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7662
Print ISSN: 0968-4883
© MCB UP Limited
1999
Quality Assurance in Education (1999) 7 (1): 41–46.
Citation
Palihawadana D, Holmes G (1999), "Modelling module evaluation in marketing education". Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 7 No. 1 pp. 41–46, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889910252531
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Monitoring, Evaluation and Validation of Courses: A Case‐study
International Journal of Educational Management (January,1988)
Evaluating an undergraduate unit using a focus group
Quality Assurance in Education (March,2001)
Quality assurance for computer‐based teaching and learning packages
Quality Assurance in Education (March,1998)
Systematic performance improvement – refining the space between learning and results
Journal of Workplace Learning (February,2003)
E‐learning: engagement, enhancement and execution
Quality Assurance in Education (March,2002)
Related Chapters
Introduction to Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Middle East: Practices and Perspectives
Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Middle East: Practices and Perspectives
Quality Assurance in Undergraduate Education: Transformation of Higher Education Policy in China
The Impact and Transformation of Education Policy in China
Business transformation
Essentials of Digital Construction: Lessons learned from digital transformation
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
