Draws on contrasting epistemological stances with regard to quality enhancement in the context of higher education and develops the work of Schon (1987), Fish (1992) and Bond (1996, 1998) concerning the technical‐rational view of professionalism and the more generous notion of professional‐artistry. Identifies how these ideas can be useful in the analysis and design of processes for organisational self‐assessment and is based on participatory action research being conducted in a UK university preparing for a major Government quality review in the year 2000. Two cases are presented, each based on the key assumptions and foundations which underpin one of the two contrasting paradigms. Concludes by exploring the key issues of conjunction and disjunction between the two paradigms of organisational self‐assessment, and proposes a framework within which the two approaches can co‐exist.
Article navigation
1 June 2000
Review Article|
June 01 2000
Organisational self‐assessment: measuring educational quality in two paradigms Available to Purchase
Chris Gore;
Chris Gore
Chris Gore is Associate Dean (Academic Affairs), Coventry Business School, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Chris Bond;
Chris Bond
Chris Bond is Principal Lecturer in Business Organisation and HRM, Coventry Business School, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Valerie Steven
Valerie Steven
Valerie Steven is Senior Lecturer in Business Organisation and HRM, Coventry Business School, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7662
Print ISSN: 0968-4883
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Quality Assurance in Education (2000) 8 (2): 76–84.
Citation
Gore C, Bond C, Steven V (2000), "Organisational self‐assessment: measuring educational quality in two paradigms". Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 76–84, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880010325538
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Internal academic quality audit in UK higher education: part II ‐ implications for a national quality assurance framework
Quality Assurance in Education (March,1997)
Academic regulation in UK higher education: part III ‐ the idea of “partnership in trust”
Quality Assurance in Education (March,1998)
The self‐assessment process at 1994 Euro quality winner, Ericsson SA
Managing Service Quality: An International Journal (December,1996)
A paradigm for benchmarking lean initiatives for quality improvement
Benchmarking: An International Journal (May,2000)
A methodology for developing a self‐assessment tool to measure quality performance in organizations
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (March,2001)
Related Chapters
Innovation in the public sector: Is it measurable?
Performance Measurement and Management Control: Behavioral Implications and Human Actions
Developing and Supporting Teaching Excellence in Higher Education
Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Challenges, Changes and the Teaching Excellence Framework
Transforming Teaching Learning With Chatbots in Higher Education: Quest, Opportunities and Challenges for Quality Enhancement
The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges, Risks, and Ethical Considerations
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
