Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

The authors examine the effect of government subsidies on firm-specific risk in a panel of US firms. Both the receipt and magnitude of subsidies significantly reduce idiosyncratic volatility, measured using residuals from the Fama–French three- and five-factor models. To capture heterogeneity, the authors draw on political risk measures from Hassan et al. (2019) and find that firms with heightened political exposure experience the strongest stabilizing effects. Using fixed effects, two-stage least squares regressions, difference-in-differences, nearest neighbor matching and correlated random effects, the authors find consistent evidence that subsidies mitigate rather than amplify firm-specific risk. The results underscore the stabilizing role of public interventions in reducing firm-level vulnerabilities and promoting corporate stability.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal