The authors examine the effect of government subsidies on firm-specific risk in a panel of US firms. Both the receipt and magnitude of subsidies significantly reduce idiosyncratic volatility, measured using residuals from the Fama–French three- and five-factor models. To capture heterogeneity, the authors draw on political risk measures from Hassan et al. (2019) and find that firms with heightened political exposure experience the strongest stabilizing effects. Using fixed effects, two-stage least squares regressions, difference-in-differences, nearest neighbor matching and correlated random effects, the authors find consistent evidence that subsidies mitigate rather than amplify firm-specific risk. The results underscore the stabilizing role of public interventions in reducing firm-level vulnerabilities and promoting corporate stability.
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 15 2026
Subsidies as stabilizers: firm-specific risk and political uncertainty Available to Purchase
Benjamin Fudali;
Department of Economics and Finance,
University of New Orleans
, New Orleans , Louisiana, USA
Corresponding author Benjamin Fudali bjfudali@uno.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
José Antonio Pérez-Amuedo
José Antonio Pérez-Amuedo
College of Business Administration,
Marquette University
, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Corresponding author Benjamin Fudali bjfudali@uno.edu
Received:
May 01 2025
Revision Received:
September 18 2025
Revision Received:
November 13 2025
Accepted:
January 05 2026
Online ISSN: 2693-9320
Print ISSN: 2693-9312
© 2026 Emerald Publishing Limited
2026
Emerald Publishing Limited
Licensed re-use rights only
Review of Corporate Finance 1–24.
Article history
Received:
May 01 2025
Revision Received:
September 18 2025
Revision Received:
November 13 2025
Accepted:
January 05 2026
Citation
Fudali B, Pérez-Amuedo JA (2026;), "Subsidies as stabilizers: firm-specific risk and political uncertainty". Review of Corporate Finance, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/RCF-05-2025-0023
Download citation file:
0
Views
Suggested Reading
What explains the change in a firm’s idiosyncratic volatility after a dividend initiation?
Managerial Finance (November,2015)
The association between earnings quality and firm-specific return volatility: Evidence from Japan
Review of Accounting and Finance (August,2016)
Farmland valuation and asset performance
Agricultural Finance Review (November,2005)
Government subsidies and corporate environmental investments: a resource-based perspective
Kybernetes (September,2022)
Extending the bargaining power model: Eighteenth century lessons from Panton, Leslie and Company in managing political risk
Journal of Management History (April,2007)
Related Chapters
Public–Private Partnership in Developing China: Evolution, Institutionalization and Risks
The Emerald Handbook of Public–Private Partnerships in Developing and Emerging Economies: Perspectives on Public Policy, Entrepreneurship and Poverty
Institutional Distance and Location Choice: New Empirical Evidence From Emerging-Market MNEs
Distance in International Business: Concept, Cost and Value
Political Risk as a Hold-Up Problem: Implications for Integrated Strategy
Strategy Beyond Markets
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
