Skip to article sections
Corrigendum| September 08 2026

Corrigendum: The entry mode choice process of emerging-market multinational enterprises in other emerging markets: a multiple-case study of Turkish firms in Pakistan

Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2059-6022
Print ISSN: 2059-6014
© 2026 Emerald Publishing Limited
2026
Emerald Publishing Limited
Licensed re-use rights only
Review of International Business and Strategy 1–2.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-08-2026-0170
Connected Content
corrigendum: The entry mode choice process of emerging-market multinational enterprises in other emerging markets: a multiple-case study of Turkish firms in Pakistan

See also

It has come to the attention of the publisher that article Danışman, A. and Azeem, A. (2026), “The entry mode choice process of emerging-market multinational enterprises in other emerging markets: a multiple-case study of Turkish firms in Pakistan”, Review of International Business and Strategy, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 347-386. Link to The entry mode choice process of emerging-market multinational enterprises in other emerging markets: a multiple-case study of Turkish firms in PakistanLink to the cited article published with incorrect Figure 1.

The correct Figure 1 is provided below:

The publisher asks that figures be submitted correctly at submission and confirmed at article proofing stage.

© 2026 Emerald Publishing Limited
2026
Emerald Publishing Limited
Licensed re-use rights only
data&figures
Data & Figures
 contents
Contents
 supplements
Supplements
 references
References
 related
Related
 languages
Languages

Data & Figures

Figure 1.
A decision tree classifies diversification direction using completion date, sector, deal type, and company size.
View largeDownload slide
The decision tree begins with Node 0, where diversification direction divides into Horizontal, 53.3 per cent, 1805, and Conglomerate, 46.7 per cent, 1581, from a total of 3386 cases. The first split uses completed date, separating 2022 from 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023. For 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023, the next split uses acquirer sector, dividing Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation, Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration, Information, Other Services, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Construction. Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation divide further by target size into very large and large companies, and medium and small companies. Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration divide further by acquirer size into very large and large companies, and small and medium companies. For 2022, the next split uses deal type, separating acquisitions of 1 to 50 per cent, acquisitions of 51 to 99 per cent, acquisitions above 51 per cent, and acquisitions of 100 per cent. Each terminal node reports the percentage and count of Horizontal and Conglomerate diversification together with the total observations for that branch.A decision tree classifies diversification direction using completion date, sector, deal type, and company size.
View largeDownload slide
The decision tree begins with Node 0, where diversification direction divides into Horizontal, 53.3 per cent, 1805, and Conglomerate, 46.7 per cent, 1581, from a total of 3386 cases. The first split uses completed date, separating 2022 from 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023. For 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023, the next split uses acquirer sector, dividing Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation, Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration, Information, Other Services, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Construction. Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation divide further by target size into very large and large companies, and medium and small companies. Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration divide further by acquirer size into very large and large companies, and small and medium companies. For 2022, the next split uses deal type, separating acquisitions of 1 to 50 per cent, acquisitions of 51 to 99 per cent, acquisitions above 51 per cent, and acquisitions of 100 per cent. Each terminal node reports the percentage and count of Horizontal and Conglomerate diversification together with the total observations for that branch.

Patterns of entry mode choice process by Turkish firms in Pakistan

Source: Authors’ own work

Figure 1.
A decision tree classifies diversification direction using completion date, sector, deal type, and company size.
View largeDownload slide
The decision tree begins with Node 0, where diversification direction divides into Horizontal, 53.3 per cent, 1805, and Conglomerate, 46.7 per cent, 1581, from a total of 3386 cases. The first split uses completed date, separating 2022 from 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023. For 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023, the next split uses acquirer sector, dividing Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation, Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration, Information, Other Services, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Construction. Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation divide further by target size into very large and large companies, and medium and small companies. Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration divide further by acquirer size into very large and large companies, and small and medium companies. For 2022, the next split uses deal type, separating acquisitions of 1 to 50 per cent, acquisitions of 51 to 99 per cent, acquisitions above 51 per cent, and acquisitions of 100 per cent. Each terminal node reports the percentage and count of Horizontal and Conglomerate diversification together with the total observations for that branch.A decision tree classifies diversification direction using completion date, sector, deal type, and company size.
View largeDownload slide
The decision tree begins with Node 0, where diversification direction divides into Horizontal, 53.3 per cent, 1805, and Conglomerate, 46.7 per cent, 1581, from a total of 3386 cases. The first split uses completed date, separating 2022 from 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023. For 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023, the next split uses acquirer sector, dividing Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation, Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration, Information, Other Services, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Construction. Manufacturing and Mining, Utilities and Waste Services, Trade and Transportation divide further by target size into very large and large companies, and medium and small companies. Finance and Management of Companies, Agriculture, Professional and Scientific Services, Real Estate, Leasing and Public Administration divide further by acquirer size into very large and large companies, and small and medium companies. For 2022, the next split uses deal type, separating acquisitions of 1 to 50 per cent, acquisitions of 51 to 99 per cent, acquisitions above 51 per cent, and acquisitions of 100 per cent. Each terminal node reports the percentage and count of Horizontal and Conglomerate diversification together with the total observations for that branch.

Patterns of entry mode choice process by Turkish firms in Pakistan

Source: Authors’ own work

Close Figure 1.

Contents

Supplements

References

Related

0 Views

New and popular articles

Suggested Reading

The entry mode choice process of emerging-market multinational enterprises in other emerging markets: a multiple-case study of Turkish firms in Pakistan
Review of International Business and Strategy (March,2026)
Market exit and re-entry in a volatile emerging economy: a case study of Yamaha motorcycles in Pakistan
Multinational Business Review (May,2023)
Competitive strategy choices of Turkish manufacturing firms in European Union
Journal of Management Development (July,2008)
Entry modes of multinational corporations into China’s market: a socioeconomic analysis
International Journal of Social Economics (May,1999)
The effects of own- and other-prior entry modes in the internationalization of Japanese multinational companies in the electronic sector
Journal of Asia Business Studies (December,2013)

Related Chapters

Foreign Entry Mode Choices of Emerging Market Multinationals: The Role of Institutional Voids in Shaping Strategic Cognition
Emerging Economies and Multinational Enterprises
How the Direction of Institutional Distance Influences Foreign Entry Mode Choices: An Information Economics Perspective
Distance in International Business: Concept, Cost and Value
Reprinted Article The institutional environment for multinational investment
Economic Institutions of Strategy

Recommended for you

These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.

Cited By

Google Scholar

Languages

  • Online ISSN 2059-6022
  • Print ISSN 2059-6014
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options