Open figure viewer
It is a sad reflection on the history of the past century that librarians should now require a Dictionary of Genocide, and that, as the authors remark, it has already been preceded by two encyclopaedias on the subject (Charny, 1999; Skelton, 2005, the latter reviewed in these columns (RR 2005/237)). Although it is specified as a dictionary, this does not mean that all its 1,100 entries are merely short definitions, for a significant number of them run to over 500 or even 1,000 words. It aims to include articles not only on the history of...
You do not currently have access to this content.
