Skip to Main Content
Purpose

To address the encapsulation challenge of fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors in complex railway environments, this paper designs a clip-on composite sensor enabling installation-friendly deployment and long-term axle counting system monitoring.

Design/methodology/approach

Wheel–rail mechanical behavior was simulated via finite element analysis (FEA) to determine optimal sensor placement. A clip-on composite sensor was subsequently engineered. Stress transduction efficacy was validated through FEA quantification of stress responses at the axle counter location.

Findings

The proposed FBG axle counter integrates temperature compensation and anti-detachment monitoring as well as advantages such as simplified installation with minimal maintenance and sustained operational reliability. It effectively transmits stress, yielding a measured strain of 39 µe under static loading conditions without sensitivity-enhancing elements.

Originality/value

This study performs FEA of wheel-rail stress distribution and engineers the dual-slot composite sensor, FEA was conducted to quantify the stress magnitude at the axle sensor position of the dual-slot composite sensor. Additionally, FEA was performed on sensors with different structural configurations, including adjustments to the axle sensor position, number of slots and axle position. The results confirmed that the designed composite sensor exhibits superior stress transfer characteristics.

Axle counting technology utilizes sensors to detect axle information from passing trains, calculating axle numbers for track occupancy monitoring by comparing counts at both ends of a monitored section. Current systems predominantly employ electromagnetic axle counters that detect wheel passages via track-mounted sensors. While this equipment offers operational simplicity and broad adoption (Liu, 2019), its components exhibit inadequate moisture resistance, corrosion resistance, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) resilience under harsh conditions (Ding, Zhao, Cheng, & Du, 2024). Moreover, each electromagnetic head requires pre-embedded power cables, rendering deployment in unmanned sections impractical.

Fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) possess inherent advantages including compact size, strong EMI immunity, and low long-distance transmission loss (Canning, 2008). FBG sensing networks deployed along tracks operate without external power supplies, transmitting only optical signals. This enables stable performance in complex railway environments and facilitates axle counting applications (Kacik, Martincek, Maciak, & Goraus, 2022). Therefore, many researchers have conducted extensive theoretical and experimental explorations on this topic. Lee, Lee, and Ho (2004) designed an FBG axle counter identifying trains through axle spacing, weight, and carriage number variations. Liu, Jian, Pei, and Yan (2005) installed multi-wavelength FBG sensors to locate trains via wavelength shift detection, validating efficacy through engineering implementations. Li, Pan, and Fan (2009) proposed a wavelength-based fiber optic grating axis sensing system that uses wavelength division multiplexing technology to achieve distributed sensing of multiple grating sensors. Wei et al. (2010) developed a differential-principle FBG sensor measuring rail strain. Yan et al. (2011) demonstrated external strain measurement reliability via FBG mounting optimization and reflected power detection. Yu, He, Wang, and Wang (2014) enhanced sensor robustness through tri-sensor collocation and peak-detection algorithms, accommodating variable train speeds. Zhang and Yan (2019) implemented Gaussian-polynomial fitting and cumulative-influence algorithms for axle counting and direction identification. Zhang et al. (2020) achieved high-speed demodulation using optical couplers and filters. Pan et al. (2022) employed dual high-sensitivity FBG strain sensors for axle counting and direction determination. Wu et al. (2024) partitioned the system into sensing, demodulation, and control subsystems for universal applicability across operational scenarios.

Finite element analysis (FEA) constitutes an engineering simulation methodology grounded in numerical approximation techniques. Leveraging mathematical principles and computational algorithms, it provides a robust framework for solving complex engineering problems. The core paradigm involves mathematical discretization of physical systems–encompassing geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions–into finite interconnected elements. This approach approximates continuum systems with infinite degrees of freedom through finite-dimensional subspace representations governed by variational principles. Hajar and Mounia (2025) analyzed the sensitivity of parameters such as contact pressure, contact patch, shear stress, stick-slip transition zones, and von Mises stress under different operating conditions for ballasted and ballastless. Wang, Zhou, Liu, Wang, and Jing (2025) investigated the time-domain and frequency-domain responses of wheel-rail contact force, wheel-rail adhesion/slip distribution, and stress states during wheel rolling in tread defect regions, and predicted wheel-rail plastic deformation and wear damage. He, Wang, Zhang, Wang, and Yang (2024) simulated the stress and strain distributions at wheel-rail contact points when C80 freight cars passed through various corrugated sections of heavy-haul railways with varying wavelengths and wave depths. Cai, Chen, and Chang (2024) employed FEA to characterize stress-strain distributions across the railhead under varying wheel-rail force regimes, identifying optimal strain gauge placement for wheel-rail force monitoring systems. Velic et al. (2023) developed a dynamic 3D finite element model, quantifying transient stress and plastic strain evolution in switch rails.

Despite these advances, existing research primarily focuses on modeling and algorithm optimization, with insufficient attention to field-application-oriented sensor structural design. The complexity of railway environments imposes significant challenges on FBG encapsulation. Environmental factors–including thermal fluctuations, humidity variations, mechanical vibrations, and strong EMI–can degrade measurement accuracy and long-term stability. Thus, rational encapsulation design is critical for enhancing FBG reliability, durability, and precision in railway monitoring, forming the foundation for sustained operational integrity. Numerous investigators have employed FEA to examine wheel-rail interactions, including contact mechanics and force transmission dynamics. These studies substantiate the efficacy of FEA in modeling railway wheel-rail interface behaviors.

This study addresses the inadequacy of current FBG axle counter encapsulation in complex railway environments. The axle counting principle is briefly introduced, followed by FEA of wheel-rail stress interactions to determine optimal sensor placement. Based on these findings, this study designs a composite sensor featuring installation-friendly architecture and long-term monitoring capability. Further FEA quantifies stress distribution in the axle counter, validating effective stress transfer within the composite structure.

The sensing principle of FBGs relies on their wavelength-specific reflectance characteristics: incident light undergoes selective reflection at a particular Bragg wavelength. Variations in ambient physical quantities–such as temperature, strain, or stress–alter the grating period and/or the effective core refractive index. This wavelength shift is governed by the fundamental equation, as follows (Ni, 2022):

(1)

In the equation, λB is the FBG wavelength; neff is the core refractive index, typically a constant; Λ is the grating period. Leveraging the strain-sensing capability of FBGs, rail deformation induced by train wheel-sets can be quantitatively monitored. During train passage, FBGs detect dynamic strain pulses characterized by distinct peak profiles. This pulse signature establishes the fundamental mechanism for FBG-based axle counting. To characterize the strain response profile of FBGs during axle passage, precise quantification of rail strain transients and spatial strain distribution under wheel loading is essential. Employing FEA to examine rail stress-strain behavior and deformation during train transit constitutes an effective methodology. Consequently, finite element software was utilized to develop high-fidelity wheel-rail models for further investigation of train-track interaction mechanisms. During modeling, constitutive material properties, geometric configurations, and boundary conditions were rigorously incorporated to ensure accurate representation of in-service wheel-rail performance. Analysis of region-specific stress-strain distributions enables precise identification of critical zones exhibiting stress concentrations and significant strain transients. FBG sensors deployed in these zones establish the foundation for axle counting functionality. Furthermore, FEA-derived data inform sensor design optimization.

The fundamental workflow of FEA comprises three sequential phases: preprocessing, solution, and postprocessing. Initially, the computational domain is established through geometric modeling and discretization of the analysis object. Subsequently, boundary conditions and applied loads are defined in accordance with physical constraints. Ultimately, the obtained solution is analyzed and evaluated. Based on operational parameters of China's passenger rail services, a finite element model was established incorporating a standard 60 kg/m rail profile and CRH2 EMU wheel set as shown in Figure 1. The wheel tread is of the LMA type, and the rail is set with a 1:40 rail base slope. This study adopts a unified coordinate system orientation with the x-axis aligned transversely to the rail, the y-axis parallel to the longitudinal direction, and the z-axis normal to the vertical plane. Boundary conditions are set for the wheel-rail system: the wheel axle position is fixed in the x and y directions, a vertical downward load of 100 kN is applied to the wheel, the friction coefficient at the wheel-rail contact surface is set to 0.2, and the track bottom boundary segments at both ends are fixed. The rail length is set to the sleeper spacing, simplifying the track into a simply supported beam model. The material properties of the wheel and rail are shown in Table 1. Discretization of the continuous wheel-rail model involves mesh generation. Given the complex contact mechanics at the wheel-rail interface, the contact zone mesh is refined, while mesh density decreases inversely proportional to distance from the contact region. The rail and wheel mesh configurations are illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. Figure 4 shows the equivalent stress of the wheel and rail obtained through finite element simulation, with a maximum equivalent stress of 1,240 N/m2. Under mid-span vertical loading, the stress field exhibits bilateral symmetry about the vertical plane through the load point, with compressive stresses developing in the upper region of the rail and tensile stresses arising in the lower region. The locations with higher equivalent stress on the rail include the rail head, rail web, and rail base. FEA reveals a distinct stress gradient across rail sections: the rail head exhibits the highest equivalent stress, followed by the web, with the base showing the lowest magnitude. However, considering long-term sensor deployment requirements, the rail head experiences significant stress fluctuations under dynamic loads, while sensor installation in this zone risks interfering with train operations. Additionally, the rail web is unsuitable due to constrained installation space and method limitations.

Figure 1
A 3-D C A D model of a mechanical wheel mounted on a rail section with labeled mm scale axes.The illustration displays a three-dimensional C A D rendering of a mechanical assembly. At the top is a large, circular wheel with a central hole, multiple concentric grooves, and detailed rim geometry. This wheel is mounted above a horizontal rail section, which appears rectangular with flanges and recesses. The scene is oriented in a right-handed coordinate system as shown by the axes at the bottom-left corner (x: red, y: green, z: blue). The horizontal (y) axis from the bottom front to inside the plane ranges from negative 200 millimeters to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 500 millimeters to 0 millimeters.

Wheel–rail model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 1
A 3-D C A D model of a mechanical wheel mounted on a rail section with labeled mm scale axes.The illustration displays a three-dimensional C A D rendering of a mechanical assembly. At the top is a large, circular wheel with a central hole, multiple concentric grooves, and detailed rim geometry. This wheel is mounted above a horizontal rail section, which appears rectangular with flanges and recesses. The scene is oriented in a right-handed coordinate system as shown by the axes at the bottom-left corner (x: red, y: green, z: blue). The horizontal (y) axis from the bottom front to inside the plane ranges from negative 200 millimeters to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 500 millimeters to 0 millimeters.

Wheel–rail model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Table 1

Wheel-rail material properties

ModelDensity (kg/m3)Young's modulus (N/m2)Poisson's ratio
Rails7,850200,0000.3
Wheels7,850200,0000.3
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Figure 2
A 3-D wireframe model of an I-beam rail section with a mesh grid and labeled axes.The illustration shows a 3 D wireframe mesh of an I-beam rail section in an x-y-z plane, with rectangular and triangular elements visible on the web, head, and base. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled x. The y-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from negative 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power millimeters to 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power millimeters with an interval of 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the left ranges from negative 600 millimeters to negative 450 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The model is rendered in grayscale with grid lines and axis ticks, and the corner of the base is located near the coordinate (0, negative 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power, negative 600).

Rail mesh configurations. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 2
A 3-D wireframe model of an I-beam rail section with a mesh grid and labeled axes.The illustration shows a 3 D wireframe mesh of an I-beam rail section in an x-y-z plane, with rectangular and triangular elements visible on the web, head, and base. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled x. The y-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from negative 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power millimeters to 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power millimeters with an interval of 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the left ranges from negative 600 millimeters to negative 450 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The model is rendered in grayscale with grid lines and axis ticks, and the corner of the base is located near the coordinate (0, negative 0.5 times 10 to the 3rd power, negative 600).

Rail mesh configurations. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 3
A 3-D mesh model of a wheel with triangular elements and millimeter grid axes.The illustration presents a three-dimensional mesh of a wheel, rendered in thin black lines over its surface to indicate finite element meshing using triangular elements. The wheel has a central hole and concentric geometric details, positioned within a 3-D coordinate system, with the axes for x, y, and z in the lower left. Vertical and horizontal gridlines with tick marks specify spatial dimensions in millimeters. The horizontal (y) axis from the bottom front to inside the plane ranges from 200 millimeters to 400 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the left ranges from negative 400 millimeters to 400 millimeters with an interval of 100 millimeters.

Wheel mesh configurations. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 3
A 3-D mesh model of a wheel with triangular elements and millimeter grid axes.The illustration presents a three-dimensional mesh of a wheel, rendered in thin black lines over its surface to indicate finite element meshing using triangular elements. The wheel has a central hole and concentric geometric details, positioned within a 3-D coordinate system, with the axes for x, y, and z in the lower left. Vertical and horizontal gridlines with tick marks specify spatial dimensions in millimeters. The horizontal (y) axis from the bottom front to inside the plane ranges from 200 millimeters to 400 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the left ranges from negative 400 millimeters to 400 millimeters with an interval of 100 millimeters.

Wheel mesh configurations. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 4
A color stress contour plot of a rail and wheel contact, with labeled axes and a vertical color scale bar.The color-mapped stress distribution of a rail under a wheel in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. The rail and wheel are depicted in blue-to-red colors—blue indicating lower stress and red indicating higher stress. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.5 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 4 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 to 50 with an interval of 50. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from 5.64 times 10 to the 4th power to 1.24 times 10 to the 9th power (Newtons per square meter). Grid lines and axis ticks are visible, and the color legend indicates stress values with corresponding colors. The wheel and the head and base of the rail section are shown in blue, while the middle portion of the rail section is shown in red, yellow, and cyan, and the point of contact is shown in red.

Equivalent stress on wheels and rails. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 4
A color stress contour plot of a rail and wheel contact, with labeled axes and a vertical color scale bar.The color-mapped stress distribution of a rail under a wheel in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. The rail and wheel are depicted in blue-to-red colors—blue indicating lower stress and red indicating higher stress. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.5 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 4 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 to 50 with an interval of 50. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from 5.64 times 10 to the 4th power to 1.24 times 10 to the 9th power (Newtons per square meter). Grid lines and axis ticks are visible, and the color legend indicates stress values with corresponding colors. The wheel and the head and base of the rail section are shown in blue, while the middle portion of the rail section is shown in red, yellow, and cyan, and the point of contact is shown in red.

Equivalent stress on wheels and rails. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

To determine the optimal FBG alignment, stress tensor components along x-(lateral), y-(longitudinal), and z-(vertical) axes in the rail are presented in Figures 5–7. Stress test points with significant deformation were selected for each section of the rail. For the rail head, a point on the inferior surface of the rail head was selected; for the rail web, a point along the central axis with higher stress was selected; and for the rail bottom, a point at the center of the bottom was selected. Equivalent von Mises stress and directional stress tensor components (x, y, z) were quantified at these measurement points as documented in Table 2. Analyze the stress field in areas outside the load application location. The transverse stress peaks beneath the load and at sleeper supports; the longitudinal stress dominates at mid-span with compression beneath the load and tension adjacent to it; the vertical stress component exhibits significant magnitude in the rail web, with compressive stress developing beneath the applied load and tensile stress manifesting on both transverse sides of the load zone. Comparative analysis of stress magnitudes at the rail base reveals the dominant order: σy>σz>σx (where σ denotes stress), and the tensile strain in the y direction was significantly greater than that in the x and z directions. Consequently, aligning the FBG sensor axis parallel to the longitudinal y-direction constitutes the optimal deployment configuration for strain transduction efficiency.

Figure 5
A stress contour plot of rail and wheel from the front, showing color scale, axis labels, and stress points.The front view of a color-mapped stress distribution of a wheel on a rail in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. The wheel and rail are shaded mostly green, with localized regions of blue to red indicating lower and higher stress. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from negative 1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 1.46 times 10 to the 9th power to 1.69 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). A few concentrated spots on the rail show intense red and blue stresses, especially at the edges and contact region. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible in the background.

x component of orbital stress tensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 5
A stress contour plot of rail and wheel from the front, showing color scale, axis labels, and stress points.The front view of a color-mapped stress distribution of a wheel on a rail in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. The wheel and rail are shaded mostly green, with localized regions of blue to red indicating lower and higher stress. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from negative 1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 1.46 times 10 to the 9th power to 1.69 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). A few concentrated spots on the rail show intense red and blue stresses, especially at the edges and contact region. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible in the background.

x component of orbital stress tensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 6
A front stress contour plot of the wheel and rail, using a color scale and labeled axes, with stress hotspots.The front view of a color-mapped stress distribution of a wheel on a rail in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. Green colors dominate most of the objects, while intense red and blue regions indicate high-stress zones across the wheel-rail interface and rail web. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from negative 1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 1.92 times 10 to the 9th power to 3.29 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). A few concentrated spots on the middle part of the rail web show intense red and blue stresses, especially at the edges, and a yellow spot on the contact region. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible in the background.

y component of orbital stress tensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 6
A front stress contour plot of the wheel and rail, using a color scale and labeled axes, with stress hotspots.The front view of a color-mapped stress distribution of a wheel on a rail in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. Green colors dominate most of the objects, while intense red and blue regions indicate high-stress zones across the wheel-rail interface and rail web. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from negative 1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 1.92 times 10 to the 9th power to 3.29 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). A few concentrated spots on the middle part of the rail web show intense red and blue stresses, especially at the edges, and a yellow spot on the contact region. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible in the background.

y component of orbital stress tensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 7
A stress contour plot of a wheel and rail, front view, showing a color bar, axis labels, and high-stress zones.The front view of a color-mapped stress distribution of a wheel on a rail in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. The yellowish-green color dominates most of the region on the wheel; the central region of the wheel is shown in orange and yellow, and the point of contact of the wheel and rail is in blue and yellow. The intense red and blue regions indicate high-stress zones across the rail web, and a concentrated red region beneath the rail. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from negative 1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 1.42 times 10 to the 9th power to 2.45 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). Grid lines and axis ticks are visible in the background.

z component of orbital stress tensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 7
A stress contour plot of a wheel and rail, front view, showing a color bar, axis labels, and high-stress zones.The front view of a color-mapped stress distribution of a wheel on a rail in an x-y-z plane, showing a wheel-rail interface in contact. The yellowish-green color dominates most of the region on the wheel; the central region of the wheel is shown in orange and yellow, and the point of contact of the wheel and rail is in blue and yellow. The intense red and blue regions indicate high-stress zones across the rail web, and a concentrated red region beneath the rail. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from negative 1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The x-axis from the bottom front to inside the plan ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The horizontal axis extending right is labeled y. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from negative 1.42 times 10 to the 9th power to 2.45 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). Grid lines and axis ticks are visible in the background.

z component of orbital stress tensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Table 2

Stress distribution of rails

StressRail head (N/m2)Rail web (N/m2)Rail base (N/m2)
Von mises30.346.917.2
X-10.3−0.5−0.7
Y-34.0−16.717.5
Z-−47.2−52.7−0.2
Source(s): Authors’ own work

Current FBG encapsulation methods comprise adhesive bonding, welding, and clip-on clamping. While organic adhesives suffice for general applications, their susceptibility to creep and aging compromises long-term stability under complex environmental conditions. Specifically in railway environments–characterized by significant thermal cycling, high humidity, and persistent mechanical vibrations–adhesive-based FBG encapsulation fails to ensure sustained operational reliability. For axle counting applications, although welding provides robust fixation, its inherent destructive installation risks track integrity damage and incurs high maintenance costs, limiting practical deployment. In contrast, clip-on sensors deliver flexible installation without structural compromise while maintaining measurement stability.

Based on the stress transfer relationship between the wheel and rail described earlier, a clip-on sensor was engineered, as shown in the Figure 8. The composite sensor is equipped with five fiber optic grating sensors. Two anti-loosening monitoring FBGs perpendicular to the rail y-axis (lateral grooves), detecting installation integrity and triggering maintenance alerts. Two axle-counting FBGs parallel to y-axis and one temperature-compensating FBG perpendicular to the y-axis (central zone), eliminating thermal interference. The FBG is bonded to the strain gauge using polymer adhesive, and the strain gauge is permanently affixed to the steel plate through welding. Clamps on both sides apply compressive force to the central steel plate, secured with bolts. The FBG is positioned within the groove between the plate and rail base, as shown in Figure 9. To enhance strain transfer efficiency, a thickness reduction was implemented at the grating location, thus increasing strain sensitivity, as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 8
A 3-D C A D model of an I-beam structural component with labeled mounting points and connection details.This illustration displays a three-dimensional C A D model of an I-beam or structural member rendered in gray. The component has a distinctive I-shaped cross-section with flanges at the top and bottom connected by a central web. Red text labels mark various features along the beam, including mounting points and connection details, though the specific text is not clearly legible in this view. There appear to be at least four red labels distributed along the length of the beam: two labels are shown horizontally at the left side on the top and bottom flanges, and two vertical red labels are on the central web. A small green and white detail or connection element is visible near the center of the beam. The component is shown in an isometric view against a light gray background.

Composite sensor model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 8
A 3-D C A D model of an I-beam structural component with labeled mounting points and connection details.This illustration displays a three-dimensional C A D model of an I-beam or structural member rendered in gray. The component has a distinctive I-shaped cross-section with flanges at the top and bottom connected by a central web. Red text labels mark various features along the beam, including mounting points and connection details, though the specific text is not clearly legible in this view. There appear to be at least four red labels distributed along the length of the beam: two labels are shown horizontally at the left side on the top and bottom flanges, and two vertical red labels are on the central web. A small green and white detail or connection element is visible near the center of the beam. The component is shown in an isometric view against a light gray background.

Composite sensor model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 9
An illustration shows a C A D top view of an I-beam-shaped structural component with centered axes.The illustration shows a computer-aided design (CAD) top-down view of a solid gray I-beam or rail-shaped structural member. The geometry features wide rectangular flanges at both ends and a thinner central web in the middle, with the grooves along the length of the flanges. These grooves are finely modeled as parallel recessed channels that run longitudinally. At the center, colored x-y-z axes are shown for orientation, with red for x, green for y, and blue for z. The part appears symmetric, and the background is light gray, typical for engineering design visualizations.

Back of composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 9
An illustration shows a C A D top view of an I-beam-shaped structural component with centered axes.The illustration shows a computer-aided design (CAD) top-down view of a solid gray I-beam or rail-shaped structural member. The geometry features wide rectangular flanges at both ends and a thinner central web in the middle, with the grooves along the length of the flanges. These grooves are finely modeled as parallel recessed channels that run longitudinally. At the center, colored x-y-z axes are shown for orientation, with red for x, green for y, and blue for z. The part appears symmetric, and the background is light gray, typical for engineering design visualizations.

Back of composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 10
A 3-D model showing an orange rail section with green mounting blocks and a gray grooved sensor assembly attached below.The illustration displays a 3-D C A D rendering of a steel rail profile in orange, shown as an I-shaped cross-section commonly used for railway tracks. A sensor assembly with parallel grooves is mounted beneath the rail, represented in gray. The assembly is secured using several green mounting blocks spaced along the sensor body, gripping both sides of the rail section. The grooves on the sensor are clearly visible running longitudinally, consistent with the previous groove detail.

Composite sensor and track assembly model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 10
A 3-D model showing an orange rail section with green mounting blocks and a gray grooved sensor assembly attached below.The illustration displays a 3-D C A D rendering of a steel rail profile in orange, shown as an I-shaped cross-section commonly used for railway tracks. A sensor assembly with parallel grooves is mounted beneath the rail, represented in gray. The assembly is secured using several green mounting blocks spaced along the sensor body, gripping both sides of the rail section. The grooves on the sensor are clearly visible running longitudinally, consistent with the previous groove detail.

Composite sensor and track assembly model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

Experimental testing revealed suboptimal sensor performance. Analysis indicated that this was likely attributable to bolt fastening predominantly constraining movement in the x-direction, providing insufficient constraint in the z-direction, coupled with significant stress transmission loss within the steel plate structure. To address these issues, structural optimizations were implemented:

  1. Slots were introduced into the steel plate to enhance sensitivity, as depicted in the Figure 11;

  2. A base was incorporated between the axle counting sensor and the steel plate, also serving to enhance sensitivity (as depicted in the Figure 12);

  3. Eight additional screws and oriented vertically upwards were installed on the original clamp bracket to firmly support the steel plate, ensuring its close contact with the underside of the rail track.

Figure 11
A gray I-beam with two vertical slots and an attached black cable at the center.The top-view CAD image shows a gray I-beam-shaped metal component with two vertical slots spaced along its central web. Within each slot, there are narrow white rectangular inserts positioned along the slot length. A black cable with a gold connector is attached at the midpoint of the lower edge, extending outwards towards the bottom left of the image. The background is a uniform light gray, and there are no other markings or features visible.

Upper surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 11
A gray I-beam with two vertical slots and an attached black cable at the center.The top-view CAD image shows a gray I-beam-shaped metal component with two vertical slots spaced along its central web. Within each slot, there are narrow white rectangular inserts positioned along the slot length. A black cable with a gold connector is attached at the midpoint of the lower edge, extending outwards towards the bottom left of the image. The background is a uniform light gray, and there are no other markings or features visible.

Upper surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 12
A gray I-beam with slots and mounted hardware, with an attached black cable with a gold connector extending outward.The C A D view shows the bottom surface of a gray I-beam structural component with two vertical slots on the central web. Each slot contains mounting hardware, including bolts and brackets, secured with metallic fasteners both in the slots and at the flanges on both ends. The hardware is symmetrically arranged, with multiple silver-colored metal fittings securing the slots and flange regions. At the bottom edge of the component, a black cable with a gold connector is attached and extends outward, curving toward the lower right. The image background is a plain light gray.

Bottom surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 12
A gray I-beam with slots and mounted hardware, with an attached black cable with a gold connector extending outward.The C A D view shows the bottom surface of a gray I-beam structural component with two vertical slots on the central web. Each slot contains mounting hardware, including bolts and brackets, secured with metallic fasteners both in the slots and at the flanges on both ends. The hardware is symmetrically arranged, with multiple silver-colored metal fittings securing the slots and flange regions. At the bottom edge of the component, a black cable with a gold connector is attached and extends outward, curving toward the lower right. The image background is a plain light gray.

Bottom surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

Per Hertzian contact theory, wheel-rail interaction within the elastic regime constitutes elliptical surface contact. The contact width ranges from 0.5 mm to 19 mm. A vertical load with 6 mm minor axis length and corresponding major axis length was applied perpendicularly along the z-axis to simulate rail stress distribution during wheel passage. To characterize stress-strain transfer behavior and rail deformation, the load was imposed at the geometric center of the wheel-rail contact patch, followed by FEA of the rail model. The FEA was conducted to investigate the stress transfer characteristics between the sensor assembly and the rail. A model of a standard 60 kg/m steel rail was developed, as shown in the Figure 13. To evaluate the stress transfer efficiency at the axle counting position, the sensor module was simplified as a steel plate structure, as shown in the Figures 14 and 15. The FBG sensor is positioned beneath this steel plate, with the plate maintaining intimate contact with the rail base. The integrated sensor-rail assembly model is presented in Figure 16.

Figure 13
A 3-D C A D rendering of a steel rail cross-section with labeled metric axes.The illustration is a three-dimensional C A D view of a steel rail profile, typically used for railway tracks. The rail section is shown in perspective, featuring a flat flanged base, a wide vertical web, and a thick, rounded head. The geometry is characterized by smooth transitions and realistic proportions. Axes and gridlines mark spatial dimensions in millimeters. A reference triad at the lower left shows orientation (x: red, y: green, z: blue). The x-axis from the upper right to the lower left ranges from 0 millimeters to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The y-axis from the top to the upper right ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from 0 to 150 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Rail model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 13
A 3-D C A D rendering of a steel rail cross-section with labeled metric axes.The illustration is a three-dimensional C A D view of a steel rail profile, typically used for railway tracks. The rail section is shown in perspective, featuring a flat flanged base, a wide vertical web, and a thick, rounded head. The geometry is characterized by smooth transitions and realistic proportions. Axes and gridlines mark spatial dimensions in millimeters. A reference triad at the lower left shows orientation (x: red, y: green, z: blue). The x-axis from the upper right to the lower left ranges from 0 millimeters to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The y-axis from the top to the upper right ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from 0 to 150 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Rail model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 14
A gray sensor with two main slots, white inserts, fasteners, and mounting holes, shown from the bottom.The gray slotted composite sensor is shown in a technical bottom-view CAD drawing. The rectangular sensor includes two long vertical slots in the central region, each containing a narrow white insert oriented parallel to the slot. Horizontal bar-shaped fasteners are mounted across the slots and inserts, securing them in place. The four corners of the sensor have mounting holes, and faint lines in the background form a grid. The axes x and y are marked at the lower left corner.

Bottom surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 14
A gray sensor with two main slots, white inserts, fasteners, and mounting holes, shown from the bottom.The gray slotted composite sensor is shown in a technical bottom-view CAD drawing. The rectangular sensor includes two long vertical slots in the central region, each containing a narrow white insert oriented parallel to the slot. Horizontal bar-shaped fasteners are mounted across the slots and inserts, securing them in place. The four corners of the sensor have mounting holes, and faint lines in the background form a grid. The axes x and y are marked at the lower left corner.

Bottom surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 15
A gray sensor with two central slots and white inserts, shown from above.The gray slotted composite sensor is viewed from above in a technical C A D drawing. The rectangular structure has two long, narrow vertical slots in the central region, each with a white inset along the slot length. The surface is smooth with no visible fasteners; the ends of the sensor are wider than the central web. Faint grid lines are overlaid in the background, and axes x and y are labeled at the lower left.

Upper surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 15
A gray sensor with two central slots and white inserts, shown from above.The gray slotted composite sensor is viewed from above in a technical C A D drawing. The rectangular structure has two long, narrow vertical slots in the central region, each with a white inset along the slot length. The surface is smooth with no visible fasteners; the ends of the sensor are wider than the central web. Faint grid lines are overlaid in the background, and axes x and y are labeled at the lower left.

Upper surface of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 16
A 3-D C A D view of a rail cross-section with an attached sensor assembly and mounting brackets.The illustration presents a three-dimensional C A D rendering of a steel rail cross-section, commonly used for railway tracks. Beneath the head of the rail, a sensor assembly is attached, consisting of several rectangular mounts and connecting rods. The assembly includes bracketed supports and slotted features, likely used for experimental measurement or instrumentation. The rail and sensor components are depicted in a technical isometric view, with axis markers in the lower left (x: red, y: green, z: blue) and gridlines giving dimensions in millimeters. The x-axis from the right to the upper left ranges from 200 millimeters to 400 millimeters. The y-axis from the bottom to the upper right ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 100 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from 0 to 150 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Slotted composite sensor and track assembly model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 16
A 3-D C A D view of a rail cross-section with an attached sensor assembly and mounting brackets.The illustration presents a three-dimensional C A D rendering of a steel rail cross-section, commonly used for railway tracks. Beneath the head of the rail, a sensor assembly is attached, consisting of several rectangular mounts and connecting rods. The assembly includes bracketed supports and slotted features, likely used for experimental measurement or instrumentation. The rail and sensor components are depicted in a technical isometric view, with axis markers in the lower left (x: red, y: green, z: blue) and gridlines giving dimensions in millimeters. The x-axis from the right to the upper left ranges from 200 millimeters to 400 millimeters. The y-axis from the bottom to the upper right ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 100 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters. The vertical (z) axis on the right ranges from 0 to 150 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Slotted composite sensor and track assembly model. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

FEA of the simplified sensor model yielded the equivalent stress distribution shown in Figure 17. Directly beneath the applied loading, the base region of the rail exhibited a principal stress magnitude of 17.2 MPa, consistent with the stress generated by the load applied to the rail through the wheel. At the geometric centroid of the steel plate bottom surface (axle counting sensor location), the equivalent von Mises stress measured 2.6 MPa, that corresponds to a stress transfer efficiency of 15.1%. Within the elastic regime, stress and strain obey Hooke's law:

Figure 17
A top-down finite element stress analysis of a mechanical assembly with a color legend and stress concentrations.The illustration presents a top-down view of a finite element analysis (F E A) stress map for a mechanical part, likely a loaded assembly or support structure. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with central square and rectangular cutouts and mounting holes. The stress distribution is color-coded: red zones dominate the outer and most of the interior, indicating higher stress, while the central region has significant blue, cyan, and yellow, marking lower stress concentrations. Central features concentrate stress, highlighted by the color contrast between blue and red. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.5 times 10 to the 6th power (blue) at the bottom to 4 times 10 to the 6th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.13 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.71 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and the left sides.

Von mises of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 17
A top-down finite element stress analysis of a mechanical assembly with a color legend and stress concentrations.The illustration presents a top-down view of a finite element analysis (F E A) stress map for a mechanical part, likely a loaded assembly or support structure. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with central square and rectangular cutouts and mounting holes. The stress distribution is color-coded: red zones dominate the outer and most of the interior, indicating higher stress, while the central region has significant blue, cyan, and yellow, marking lower stress concentrations. Central features concentrate stress, highlighted by the color contrast between blue and red. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.5 times 10 to the 6th power (blue) at the bottom to 4 times 10 to the 6th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.13 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.71 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and the left sides.

Von mises of the slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
(2)

where σ is stress, E is elastic modulus, and ε is strain. Then, the strain at the sensor position is approximately 13 με, and the sensor response is too small, which is not conducive to peak detection. Substituting the steel plate with a sensitive strain gauge can enhance stress transduction efficiency.

To achieve enhanced sensitization performance, two through-slots were machined from opposing sides at the axle counting sensor position (see Figures 18 and 19). This optimized configuration was subjected to FEA, with the resultant equivalent von Mises stress distribution detailed in Figure 20. For experimental validation, a steel plate replicating strain transduction behavior was mounted at the identical sensor location, recording 7.81 MPa stress and 39 με strain. This corresponds to a stress transfer efficiency of 45.4%, representing a 200% improvement in strain sensitivity over the baseline model.

Figure 18
A gray double-slotted sensor with two main slots, white inserts, and mounting holes, shown from the bottom.The bottom surface of a gray composite sensor is shown in a technical C A D drawing. The sensor features two parallel vertical slots, each with a narrow white insert fitted within its length: the left one from the top edge and the right one from the bottom edge of the central web. Horizontal bar-shaped fasteners are mounted across the slots and inserts, holding them in place. Each of the four corners contains a round mounting hole, and the ends of the sensor are wider than the central web. Thin grid lines form a backdrop, and coordinate axes (x, y) are indicated at the bottom left.

Bottom surface of the double-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 18
A gray double-slotted sensor with two main slots, white inserts, and mounting holes, shown from the bottom.The bottom surface of a gray composite sensor is shown in a technical C A D drawing. The sensor features two parallel vertical slots, each with a narrow white insert fitted within its length: the left one from the top edge and the right one from the bottom edge of the central web. Horizontal bar-shaped fasteners are mounted across the slots and inserts, holding them in place. Each of the four corners contains a round mounting hole, and the ends of the sensor are wider than the central web. Thin grid lines form a backdrop, and coordinate axes (x, y) are indicated at the bottom left.

Bottom surface of the double-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 19
A gray double-slotted sensor with two central slots, shown from above.The top view of a gray composite sensor is shown in a technical C A D drawing. The structure has two parallel, vertical slots in the central region, creating a symmetrical shape. These parallel vertical slots, each with a narrow white insert, are fitted within the central web: the left one from the bottom edge and the right one from the top edge of the central web. The surface is smooth and lacks visible fasteners or inserts. The ends of the sensor are wider than the central web, forming an I-beam profile. Background grid lines and axes for x and y are visible in the lower left.

Upper surface of the double-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 19
A gray double-slotted sensor with two central slots, shown from above.The top view of a gray composite sensor is shown in a technical C A D drawing. The structure has two parallel, vertical slots in the central region, creating a symmetrical shape. These parallel vertical slots, each with a narrow white insert, are fitted within the central web: the left one from the bottom edge and the right one from the top edge of the central web. The surface is smooth and lacks visible fasteners or inserts. The ends of the sensor are wider than the central web, forming an I-beam profile. Background grid lines and axes for x and y are visible in the lower left.

Upper surface of the double-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 20
A Von Mises stress distribution plot for a composite sensor with red high-stress zones and blue low-stress regions.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite sensor, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central square and rectangular cutouts and mounting holes. The stress contours use a color scale, with most high-stress regions in red centered around the slots and inside faces, while blue and green represent lower-stress areas farther from the features. The center area between the slots shows the highest stress concentration, highlighted in red and yellow. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.07 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.75 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and the left sides.

Von mises of the double-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 20
A Von Mises stress distribution plot for a composite sensor with red high-stress zones and blue low-stress regions.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite sensor, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central square and rectangular cutouts and mounting holes. The stress contours use a color scale, with most high-stress regions in red centered around the slots and inside faces, while blue and green represent lower-stress areas farther from the features. The center area between the slots shows the highest stress concentration, highlighted in red and yellow. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.07 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.75 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and the left sides.

Von mises of the double-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

Based on the principle of strain concentration at geometric discontinuities, the axle counting sensor was relocated proximal to the slot opening edge to capitalize on enhanced deformation potential (see Figure 21). The reconfigured model was subjected to FEA, revealing an equivalent von Mises stress magnitude of 8.85 MPa at the sensor location (see Figure 22). This represents a 13.3% increase from the 7.81 MPa baseline value at the identical position, though the deviation falls within deviations. Consequently, design modification necessitates co-optimization with wiring constraints.

Figure 21
A double-slotted sensor with two main slots, white inserts, fasteners, and mounting holes, with a millimeter scale.The bottom-view technical drawing shows a double-slotted composite sensor in gray. The rectangular sensor contains two parallel vertical slots, each fitted with a narrow white insert within its length: the left one from the top edge and the right one from the bottom edge of the central web. Horizontal bar-shaped fasteners run across the slots, holding the inserts in position. Mounting holes are present at each of the four corners. Background grid lines and horizontal and vertical rulers indicate measurements in millimeters, with x- and y-axes labeled at the lower left. The horizontal axis at the top ranges from 100 millimeters at the right to 400 millimeters at the left with an interval of 100 millimeters. The vertical axis on the left ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Bottom surface of the double-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 21
A double-slotted sensor with two main slots, white inserts, fasteners, and mounting holes, with a millimeter scale.The bottom-view technical drawing shows a double-slotted composite sensor in gray. The rectangular sensor contains two parallel vertical slots, each fitted with a narrow white insert within its length: the left one from the top edge and the right one from the bottom edge of the central web. Horizontal bar-shaped fasteners run across the slots, holding the inserts in position. Mounting holes are present at each of the four corners. Background grid lines and horizontal and vertical rulers indicate measurements in millimeters, with x- and y-axes labeled at the lower left. The horizontal axis at the top ranges from 100 millimeters at the right to 400 millimeters at the left with an interval of 100 millimeters. The vertical axis on the left ranges from negative 50 millimeters to 50 millimeters with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Bottom surface of the double-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 22
A Von Mises stress contour for a double-slotted structure, showing red high-stress zones and blue low-stress regions.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and mounting holes. The stress contours use a color scale and highlight regions of peak stress: intense red stretches along slot perimeters and ends, with blue and green areas around central and less loaded zones. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.3 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.36 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of a double-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 22
A Von Mises stress contour for a double-slotted structure, showing red high-stress zones and blue low-stress regions.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and mounting holes. The stress contours use a color scale and highlight regions of peak stress: intense red stretches along slot perimeters and ends, with blue and green areas around central and less loaded zones. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.3 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.36 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of a double-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

To evaluate potential adverse effects of biaxially oriented through-slots on deformation at the sensing location, a single-slot configuration was modeled (see Figure 23). FEA yielded an equivalent von Mises stress magnitude of 8.79 MPa at the axle counting sensor position (see Figure 24). This represents a statistically insignificant 12.5% deviation from the dual-slot configuration's 7.81 MPa, confirming that the dual-slot design induces no detrimental deformation effects.

Figure 23
A bottom view of a gray single-slotted sensor with one slot, a white insert, a bar fastener, and four mounting holes.The bottom-view C A D drawing shows a gray composite sensor. The sensor’s I-beam-shaped body features one vertical slot at the center, with a narrow white insert aligned along the slot. A horizontal bar-shaped fastener crosses the slot and insert at the midpoint. Each corner of the sensor body contains a round mounting hole, and gridlines are visible in the background for alignment reference. The x- and y-axes are marked at the lower left. The vertical axis on the right ranges from negative 50 millimeters at the top to 50 millimeters at the bottom with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Bottom surface of the single-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 23
A bottom view of a gray single-slotted sensor with one slot, a white insert, a bar fastener, and four mounting holes.The bottom-view C A D drawing shows a gray composite sensor. The sensor’s I-beam-shaped body features one vertical slot at the center, with a narrow white insert aligned along the slot. A horizontal bar-shaped fastener crosses the slot and insert at the midpoint. Each corner of the sensor body contains a round mounting hole, and gridlines are visible in the background for alignment reference. The x- and y-axes are marked at the lower left. The vertical axis on the right ranges from negative 50 millimeters at the top to 50 millimeters at the bottom with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Bottom surface of the single-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 24
A Von Mises stress analysis showing concentrated red and blue zones in a symmetric, slotted structure.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and peripheral mounting holes. The stress contours use a color scale and highlight the highest stresses (red) observed around slot edges and at end faces, while lower stresses (blue and green) are mostly in the center and corners. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.27 times 10 to the 4th power to 6.5 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of the single-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 24
A Von Mises stress analysis showing concentrated red and blue zones in a symmetric, slotted structure.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and peripheral mounting holes. The stress contours use a color scale and highlight the highest stresses (red) observed around slot edges and at end faces, while lower stresses (blue and green) are mostly in the center and corners. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.27 times 10 to the 4th power to 6.5 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of the single-slotted composite sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

To assess single-slot configuration effects, a sensor model incorporating slot-edge positioning was developed (see Figure 25). FEA revealed an equivalent von Mises stress magnitude of 9.15 MPa at the sensing location (see Figure 26). This represents a 3.39% increase relative to the dual-slot configuration's 8.85 MPa, confirming that biaxial slotting induces no detrimental deformation effects.

Figure 25
A bottom view of a sensor with one slot, a white insert, a bar fastener, four mounting holes, and edge-placed axes.The bottom-view C A D drawing shows a gray composite sensor. The sensor has an I-beam shape with a single vertical slot at the center, containing a white rectangular insert. A horizontal bar fastener spans the slot and insert at the midpoint. Four mounting holes are present, one at each corner of the sensor. Grid lines overlay the background for reference, and the x-y axes marker is positioned at the lower left edge. The vertical axis on the right ranges from negative 50 millimeters at the top to 50 millimeters at the bottom with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Bottom surface of the single-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 25
A bottom view of a sensor with one slot, a white insert, a bar fastener, four mounting holes, and edge-placed axes.The bottom-view C A D drawing shows a gray composite sensor. The sensor has an I-beam shape with a single vertical slot at the center, containing a white rectangular insert. A horizontal bar fastener spans the slot and insert at the midpoint. Four mounting holes are present, one at each corner of the sensor. Grid lines overlay the background for reference, and the x-y axes marker is positioned at the lower left edge. The vertical axis on the right ranges from negative 50 millimeters at the top to 50 millimeters at the bottom with an interval of 50 millimeters.

Bottom surface of the single-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 26
A Von Mises stress map of a double-slotted structure, showing red high-stress regions and blue low-stress zones.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and peripheral mounting holes. Most of the structure is colored red, indicating regions of highest stress, particularly around the slot edges, end faces, and interior corners. Lower stresses, indicated by blue, cyan, and yellow colors, are mainly found in the slots’ central zones and toward the far exterior. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.26 times 10 to the 4th power to 6.57 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of the single-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 26
A Von Mises stress map of a double-slotted structure, showing red high-stress regions and blue low-stress zones.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and peripheral mounting holes. Most of the structure is colored red, indicating regions of highest stress, particularly around the slot edges, end faces, and interior corners. Lower stresses, indicated by blue, cyan, and yellow colors, are mainly found in the slots’ central zones and toward the far exterior. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.26 times 10 to the 4th power to 6.57 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of the single-slotted composite sensor with a counting axis sensor located at the edge. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

In prior simulations, wheel loading was centered over the composite sensor assembly. To assess off-center loading effects, a model with the axle positioned directly above the right axle counting sensor was developed (see Figure 27). The equivalent von Mises stress at this sensor location measured 7.06 MPa (see Figure 28), representing a 9.60% deviation from the dual-slot configuration’s 7.81 MPa under centered loading. This confirms negligible deformation sensitivity to axle positioning variations.

Figure 27
An illustration of a rectangular component with two load points shown in millimeters.The illustration depicts a rectangular structural component, possibly a beam or plate, has two distinct load positions in the middle of the plate. The left circle is labeled “load at the center,” and the right circle is labeled “load offset from the center.” The component is shown with a ribbed texture of horizontal lines. The distances between different points along the x-axis (horizontal axis) are indicated in millimeters, ranging from 0 to 400 millimeters. A 2-dimensional coordinate system is shown on the bottom-left corner with a leftward x-axis and a downward y-axis. A vertical grid-like structure is shown on the left of the plate.

Load after rightward shift versus original load. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 27
An illustration of a rectangular component with two load points shown in millimeters.The illustration depicts a rectangular structural component, possibly a beam or plate, has two distinct load positions in the middle of the plate. The left circle is labeled “load at the center,” and the right circle is labeled “load offset from the center.” The component is shown with a ribbed texture of horizontal lines. The distances between different points along the x-axis (horizontal axis) are indicated in millimeters, ranging from 0 to 400 millimeters. A 2-dimensional coordinate system is shown on the bottom-left corner with a leftward x-axis and a downward y-axis. A vertical grid-like structure is shown on the left of the plate.

Load after rightward shift versus original load. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal
Figure 28
A Von Mises stress contour plot for a symmetric, double-slotted component shows high (red) and low (blue) stress regions.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and peripheral mounting holes. The majority of the component is colored red, representing high-stress regions. Blue and green areas denote lower stress, concentrated mainly in the slot interiors and outer corners. It highlights stress concentrations in red along the slot edges and end faces in the double-slotted design. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.07 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.75 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of the double-slotted composite sensor located directly above the right axle sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Figure 28
A Von Mises stress contour plot for a symmetric, double-slotted component shows high (red) and low (blue) stress regions.The illustration presents a top-down finite element analysis of the double-slotted composite structure, depicting the Von Mises stress distribution. The geometry features symmetric rectangular arrangements, with dual central slots of square and rectangular cutouts and peripheral mounting holes. The majority of the component is colored red, representing high-stress regions. Blue and green areas denote lower stress, concentrated mainly in the slot interiors and outer corners. It highlights stress concentrations in red along the slot edges and end faces in the double-slotted design. The vertical color scale bar on the right ranges from 0.1 times 10 to the 7th power (blue) at the bottom to 1 times 10 to the 7th power (red) at the top. Axes x, y, and z are labeled in the left corner of the image. The horizontal axis extending left is labeled x and ranges from 0 to 400 millimeters with an interval of 200 millimeters. The vertical (y) axis on the right ranges from 1.07 times 10 to the 4th power to 5.75 times 10 to the 8th power (Newtons per square meter). The z-axis from the top front to inside the plan ranges from 0 to 100 millimeters. Grid lines and axis ticks are visible at the top and on the left side.

Von mises of the double-slotted composite sensor located directly above the right axle sensor. Source(s): Authors’ own work

Close modal

Through comparative analysis of slot configurations, sensor positioning, and axle-sensor alignment effects on stress transfer characteristics, the following conclusions are substantiated:

  1. Opening the slots can effectively enhance stress transmission (increasing it by up to three times);

  2. Dual-slot configurations induce statistically insignificant stress variance;

  3. The placement of sensors relative to the edge of the slot causes stress modulation of ≤13.3%. The optimal sensor placement needs to be optimized in conjunction with wiring constraints and strain uniformity targets;

  4. The deviation between the axis and sensor position causes stress fluctuations of 9.6%, which can be considered insignificant.

Recent years have witnessed significant advancements in FBG applications for railway axle counting systems. However, extant research predominantly focused on theoretical modeling, stress analysis, and algorithmic optimization, with limited attention to sensor structural design addressing practical field requirements. To fulfill FBG axle sensor design requirements, a finite element model incorporating material properties, geometric configurations, and boundary conditions simulated train-rail interaction. Static load analysis yielded rail von Mises stress distributions, graphically depicting spatial stress magnitude and gradient patterns, providing crucial insights into the stress state of the rail. Analysis of the stress distribution map revealed that the regions with higher stress levels include the rail head, rail web, and rail base. Among these, the rail head and rail web are unsuitable for installing sensors that meet the requirements for long-term monitoring without damaging the rail itself. Peak stress locations were identified within each rail section through comparative analysis of equivalent von Mises stress and directional stress tensor components (x, y, z). This assessment established the base region as the optimal sensing location for transducer installation. Further analysis of the stress distribution at the rail base confirmed that the y-direction of the rail is the region with the highest stress component. This informed the design solution of installing the fiber optic grating sensor at the rail base, with the axle counting sensor's axis parallel to the rail direction.

A clip-on composite sensor has been designed for easy installation and maintenance, effectively protecting the fiber optic grating to ensure stable and reliable measurement performance in harsh environments. To further enhance measurement accuracy, the composite sensor is equipped with a temperature-compensated grating that monitors environmental temperature changes in real time, effectively eliminating the interference of temperature factors on the stress measurement results of the fiber optic grating, thereby significantly improving the accuracy of stress measurements. Additionally, to ensure the long-term stable operation of the sensor, an anti-detachment monitoring FBG is installed to monitor the installation status of the composite sensor in real time. Once any installation loosening is detected, an early warning signal is immediately issued, enabling staff to promptly take maintenance measures. The composite sensor was structurally optimized by cutting slots in the steel plate at the position of the axle sensor to enhance sensitivity. Stress transfer was increased to 3 times, reaching 7.81 MPa, with strain of 39 με. Given that rolling contact stresses induced by dynamic wheel loads during train operation typically exceed static loading by a factor of 1.2–1.5, and the implementation of sensitivity-enhanced strain transducers–as opposed to conventional steel plates–effectively amplifies strain transfer to FBG, operational axle counting sensors exhibited measurable strains exceeding 39 με. To validate the design rationality and performance reliability of the dual-slot composite sensor, FEA was conducted to quantify the stress magnitude at the axle sensor position of the dual-slot composite sensor. Additionally, FEA was performed on sensors with different structural configurations, including adjustments to the axle sensor position, number of slots, and axle position. The results confirmed that the designed composite sensor exhibited superior stress transfer characteristics satisfying FBG axle measurement system requirements.

Future work will implement transient dynamics simulations of train-rail interactions to characterize dynamic strain transients and spatial strain distributions under variable train mass/velocity profiles. Sensor topology will be optimized to enhance strain resolution and enable multi-parameter monitoring. Based on the sensor's dynamic response and measurement accuracy, an appropriate fiber optic grating wavelength demodulation rate will be selected, and an axle counting algorithm will be designed and tested on-site.

Cai
,
Y. W.
,
Chen
,
B.
, &
Chang
,
C. Y.
(
2024
).
Research on the strain gauge mounting scheme of track wheel force measurement system based on high-speed wheel/rail relationship test rig
.
Railway Sciences
,
3
(
4
),
503
513
. doi: .
Canning
,
J.
(
2008
).
Fibre gratings and devices for sensors and lasers
.
Laser and Photonics Review
,
2
(
4
),
275
289
. doi: .
Ding
,
B. Y.
,
Zhao
,
Q.
,
Cheng
,
D. Y.
, &
Du
,
D. W.
(
2024
).
Technology and application progress of fiber bragg grating pressure sensing
.
Study on Optical Communications
,
3
,
75
86
.
Hajar
,
R.
, &
Mounia
,
A.
(
2025
).
Investigating wheel–rail contact behavior on ballasted and non-ballasted tracks using finite element simulation
.
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
,
1
20
,
(prepublish)
.
He
,
J.
,
Wang
,
W. Q.
,
Zhang
,
Q.
,
Wang
,
W. K.
, &
Yang
,
N. P.
(
2024
).
Analysis of rail corrugation deterioration behavior on a heavy-haul railway
.
Proceedings - Institution of Mechanical Engineers
,
238
(
9
),
1133
1140
. doi: .
Kacik
,
D.
,
Martincek
,
I.
,
Maciak
,
J.
, &
Goraus
,
M.
(
2022
).
Fabry-pérot interferometer monitoring system for counting train axle
.
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
,
71
,
1
9
. doi: .
Lee
,
K. Y.
,
Lee
,
K. K.
, &
Ho
,
S. L.
(
2004
).
Exploration of using FBG sensor for axle counter in railway engineering
.
WSEAS Transactions on Systems
,
3
(
6
),
2440
2447
.
Li
,
W. L.
,
Pan
,
J. J.
, &
Fan
,
D.
(
2009
).
Data acquisition and processing for fiber grating train axle counting system
.
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology
,
31
(
2
),
13
15
.
Liu
,
Y. L.
(
2019
).
Rsearch on magnetic field analysis and parameter optimization of unilateral axle counting sensor
.
Harbin
:
Harbin Institute of Technology
.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Jian
,
S. S.
,
Pei
,
L.
, &
Yan
,
F. P.
(
2005
).
Research on the novel maglev train locating method based on fiber grating pressure sensor
.
Journal of the China Railway Society
,
27
(
5
),
72
76
.
Ni
,
X.
(
2022
).
Research and Implementation of high stability fiber bragg grating track axle counter system
.
Wuhan
:
Wuhan University of Technology
.
Pan
,
J. J.
,
Hou
,
W.
,
Bao
,
C. W.
,
Wang
,
L. Y.
,
Lv
,
H. Y.
, &
Zhou
,
W.
(
2022
).
Research on axle counting sensor based on fiber Bragg grating
. In
Eighth Symposium on Novel Photoelectronic Detection Technology and Applications
,
America
.
SPIE
.
Velic
,
D.
,
Krobath
,
M.
,
Stocker
,
E.
,
Ossberger
,
U.
,
Gsodam
,
J.
, &
Daves
,
W.
(
2023
).
A finite element modelling approach for the numerical analysis of switch rail contact loading and cyclic profile degradation
.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
237
(
2
),
157
165
. doi: .
Wang
,
J. N.
,
Zhou
,
X. F.
,
Liu
,
K.
,
Wang
,
K. Y.
, &
Jing
,
L.
(
2025
).
Wheel-rail dynamic interaction induced by tread spalling integrating with pre-fatigue damage of materials
.
Computers & Structures
,
308
, 107640. doi: .
Wei
,
C. L.
,
Lai
,
C. C.
,
Liu
,
S. Y.
,
Chung
,
W. H.
,
Ho
,
T. K.
,
Tam
,
H. Y.
, …
Lee
,
K. Y.
(
2010
).
A Fiber bragg grating sensor system for train axle counting
.
IEEE Sensors Journal
,
10
(
12
),
1905
1912
. doi: .
Wu
,
C. X.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Yang
,
F.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
T. F.
, &
Wang
,
D.
(
2024
).
Research on axle counter system based on fiber bragg grating sensing technology
.
Railway signaling & communication engineering
,
21
(
8
),
9
14
,
91
.
Yan
,
L. S.
,
Zhang
,
Z. T.
,
Wang
,
P.
,
Pan
,
W.
,
Guo
,
L. K.
,
Luo
,
B.
, …
Zhao
,
G. G.
(
2011
).
Fiber sensors for strain measurements and axle counting in high-speed railway applications
.
IEEE Sensors Journal
,
11
(
7
),
1587
1594
. doi: .
Yu
,
Q.
,
He
,
D. W.
,
Wang
,
Y. S.
, &
Wang
,
P. F.
(
2014
).
Axle counter for high-speed railway based on fibre Bragg grating sensor and algorithm optimization for peak searching
. In
7th International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies (AOMATT 2014)
,
Harbin, China
(pp. 
92850D
).
SPIE Digital Library
.
Zhang
,
S. L.
, &
Yan
,
Y.
(
2019
).
Monitoring system of track circuit system based on optical fiber sensor
.
Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (Natural Science Edition)
,
32
(
3
),
107
112
.
Zhang
,
L.
,
Pan
,
J. J.
,
Wang
,
Z. X.
,
Zhou
,
R.
,
Lin
,
J. F.
, &
Wu
,
C. X.
(
2020
).
An intensity demodulated FBG axle counter system
. In
2020 International Conference on Computer, Network, Communication and Information Systems (CNCI 2020)
,
Canada
.
Clausius Scientific Press
.
Published in Railway Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal