Figure 1. Annual average board size and number of female (executive) board members, between 2010 and 2022 Note(s): This figure illustrates the annual average board size and the number of female board members, including female executive board members, from 2010 to 2022. The data shows a gradual ... More about this image found in Annual average board size and number of female (executive) board members, b...

Figure 2. Average word count (per 10,000 words) of CSR versus conservative logic dictionaries in annual reports, between 2010 and 2022 Note(s): The figure illustrates the average word count (per 10,000 words) of corporate social responsibility ( CSR ) terms compared to conservative logic-rela... More about this image found in Average word count (per 10,000 words) of CSR versus conservative logic di...

Figure 3. Evolution of institutional logics and female board representation, 2010–2022 Note(s): This figure illustrates the simultaneous development of institutional logics and female board representation in Dutch-listed companies over the period 2010–2022. The left y-axis shows the proportion of women in executive and nonexecutive board positions, expressed as a percentage of total board membership. The right y-axis displays standardized values for CSR and conservative logics A combined bar and line graph showing female board representation and standardised logic trends from 2010 to 2022. The combined graph presents trends in female board representation alongside standardised C S R and Conservative logics from 2010 to 2022. The x-axis represents Year. The left y-axis represents the percentage of board membership, while the right y-axis represents Standardised logics ranging from negative 1 to positive 1. White bars represent the female non-executive percentage and increase steadily from approximately 6 percent in 2010 to around 25 percent in 2022. Blue horizontal bars near zero represent the female executive percentage and remain minimal throughout the period. A solid line representing C S R logic, standardised, rises overall from approximately negative 0.5 to around 0.7 by 2022. A dashed line representing Conservative logic, standardised, fluctuates moderately but generally increases from around negative 0.3 to approximately 0.4. The graph demonstrates growing female non-executive representation alongside increasing C S R and Conservative logic measures. More about this image found in Evolution of institutional logics and female board representation, 2010–202...

Figure 1. Conceptual framework: synergistic dynamic processes A conceptual diagram shows enabling drivers influencing strategic and operational variables, which interact and lead to emergent outcomes within strategic commitment and dynamic capability frameworks. The diagram presents a flow fro... More about this image found in Conceptual framework: synergistic dynamic processes A conceptual diagram...

Figure 2. Research model: proposition development A flow diagram shows firm E S G commitment leading to strategic E S G focus and E S G goal metrics, progressing through resource allocation and activities to E S G performance outcomes. The diagram presents a flow from firm E S G commitment on ... More about this image found in Research model: proposition development A flow diagram shows firm E S G ...

Figure 3. Firm commitment and strategic focus across ESG domains Source: Constructed by the authors with the data retrieved from annual reports and ESG reports published by each company A bar chart compares G R I disclosures for environment, social, and governance across five firms, with... More about this image found in Firm commitment and strategic focus across ESG domains Source: Constru...

Figure 4. Heatmap based on Environmental activities by the five case study companies Note(s): Shaded areas indicate that companies implement and report the related standards. Figure 4 does not include the 11 disclosures adopted by all five companies. These 11 disclosures are comprised of 3 re... More about this image found in Heatmap based on Environmental activities by the five case study companies ...

Figure 5. Heatmap based on Social activities by the five case study companies Note(s): Shaded areas indicate that companies implement and report the related standards. The above figure does not include the 16 disclosures adopted by all five companies. Notably, all five companies did not adopt P... More about this image found in Heatmap based on Social activities by the five case study companies Note(...

Figure 6. Heatmap based on Governance activities by the five case study companies Note(s): Shaded areas indicate that companies implement and report the related standards. In the classification of GRI Standards, those marked with an asterisk (*) correspond to Universal Standards, which are ma... More about this image found in Heatmap based on Governance activities by the five case study companies N...

Figure 7. ESG performance by the five major Korean companies – GHG emissions Note(s): The above graph is based on the unit obtained by dividing the total greenhouse gas emissions from corporate production activities by the company’s revenue. The original data unit was in “tons” and “100 mil... More about this image found in ESG performance by the five major Korean companies – GHG emissions Not...

Figure 1. Hypothesized research model Note: H4: Mediating Role of Social Accounting and H5: Moderating Role of Community Participation in the relationship between Corporate Social Innovation and Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility Source: Authors’ own work A conceptual model links corporate social innovation, social accounting, and sustainable corporate social responsibility with community participation as a moderating factor. The model presents a flow of relationships between labelled boxes. Three inputs, social enterprise support, social innovation, and social enterprise partnership, connect into corporate social innovation. An arrow labelled H 1 leads from corporate social innovation to social accounting. Another arrow labelled H 2 connects social accounting to sustainable corporate social responsibility. A direct path labelled H 3 connects corporate social innovation to sustainable corporate social responsibility. A separate box labelled community participation connects upward to the H 3 path, indicating its role influencing this relationship. More about this image found in Hypothesized research model Note: H4: Mediating Role of ...

Figure 2. Sustainable corporate social responsibility mechanism Source: Authors’ own work The structural model illustrates the relationships among SES, SEE, SI, CSI, SAC, CP, and SCSR. The model presents a structural model with labelled nodes and paths. S E S, S E E, and S I connect to C S ... More about this image found in Sustainable corporate social responsibility mechanism Source: Authors’ o...

Figure 3. Slope analysis of community participation Source: Authors’ own work The interaction plot indicates that as CSI increases, SCSR rises more steeply at higher levels of CP, confirming a positive moderating effect of CP on the CSI–SCSR relationship. The graph plots sustainable corpora... More about this image found in Slope analysis of community participation Source: Authors’ own work T...

Figure 2. Distribution of the greenwashing variable Source: Authors’ own creation A histogram showing distribution of the greenwashing variable G W. The horizontal axis shows G W values from 0 to 1 and the vertical axis shows density from 0 to 4. The distribution peaks around 0.45 and gradu... More about this image found in Distribution of the greenwashing variable Source: Authors’ own creation ...

Figure 3. Distribution of the entropy index Source: Authors’ own creation A histogram showing distribution of the entropy index ENTRO I D X. The horizontal axis shows ENTRO I D X values from 0 to about 1.6 and the vertical axis shows density from 0 to 3. The distribution peaks around 0.7 an... More about this image found in Distribution of the entropy index Source: Authors’ own creation A his...