Identifies the drivers, classifies the structures, examines the governance systems and estimates the relative economic costs and benefits of various identity‐preserved production and marketing (IPPM) systems that have evolved in the Canadian canola industry. The systems vary significantly, depending on whether they are managing input‐ or output‐based, traditionally bred or biotechnology‐based traits. Combines transaction costs and principal‐agent theory in a synthesized transaction cost‐agency model that allows for predictions regarding the organizational form of vertical integration based on the degree of asset specificity, task programmability and non‐separability. Transactions for new, proprietary, novel‐trait canola varieties require a more extensive set of institutions than traditional varieties. Identity‐preserved production and marketing systems appear technically feasible for smaller units of production, but it is unclear whether they are economically viable for long‐term or larger‐scale operations. IPPM systems can provide an effective and proven method of controlling risks and liabilities.
Article navigation
1 September 2004
Conceptual Paper|
September 01 2004
Managing the value of new‐trait varieties in the canola supply chain in Canada
Peter W.B. Phillips;
Peter W.B. Phillips
Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Stuart Smyth
Stuart Smyth
PhD Candidate, in the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6852
Print ISSN: 1359-8546
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal (2004) 9 (4): 313–322.
Citation
Phillips PW, Smyth S (2004), "Managing the value of new‐trait varieties in the canola supply chain in Canada". Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 4 pp. 313–322, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410550064
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Are the Tokyo Grain Exchange non‐genetically modified organism (non‐GMO) and conventional soybean futures markets integrated?
Agricultural Finance Review (May,2011)
Food biotechnology ‐ views of farmers and growers
British Food Journal (May,1996)
Biotechnology in agriculture: Perceived risks, benefits and attitudes in Italy
British Food Journal (March,2000)
UK food industry initiatives
British Food Journal (May,1996)
Regulating genetically modified organisms in the interests of whom?
Managerial Law (December,2001)
Related Chapters
Chapter 10 Consumer Preferences for Genetically Modified Food
Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare
Open Source Platforms Beyond Software: From ICT to Biotechnology
Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms
Chapter 2 Genetically Modified Crops and Global Food Security
Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
