In early 1989 the original version of the Reliability Figures of Merit (FM) for the solder attachments of surface mount (SM) assemblies was published. That version of the FM was specifically tailored for telecommunications environments. Misapplications of FMs to use environments, such as military applications and accelerated tests, pointed to a real need for generally applicable FMs. Adequate reliability of SM solder connections can only be assured with a ‘Design for Reliability’ based on solder joint behaviour and the underlying fatigue damage mechanisms. Perceived difficulties with a ‘Design for Reliability’ stem from the very complex and only partially understood nature of the interacting mechanisms underlying thermally induced solder joint fatigue, combined with the highly temperature, time, and stress‐dependent behaviour of some of the materials involved, especially solder. In this paper generic FMs are presented. These are simple design tools, easily applied by users unfamiliar with the underlying complexities of solder fatigue and the reliability assessment results are in Go/No‐go format. The oversimplifications contained in Version 1 of the FMs (originally thought necessary for simple design tools and limiting their applicability) are omitted, making these generic FMs more readily understood.
Article navigation
1 January 1992
Review Article|
January 01 1992
Figures of Merit Design Tools for Surface Mount Solder Joint Reliability
W. Engelmaier
W. Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, Inc., Mendham, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6836
Print ISSN: 0954-0911
© MCB UP Limited
1992
Soldering & Surface Mount Technology (1992) 4 (1): 17–22.
Citation
Engelmaier W (1992), "Figures of Merit Design Tools for Surface Mount Solder Joint Reliability". Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, Vol. 4 No. 1 pp. 17–22, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb037775
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Merit: Who, What, and Why
Library Hi Tech (April,1998)
A framework for merit, diversity, equity, and inclusion
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management (March,2026)
Why shouldn't merit be paid for?
Education + Training (October,1975)
Perceptions of politics and fairness in merit pay
Journal of Managerial Psychology (March,2010)
Prior commitment and the merit pay allocation process
Journal of Managerial Psychology (May,2001)
Related Chapters
Merit Pay Administration
Merit Pay: A Strategic Approach to Linking Pay to Performance (Third Edition)
Evaluating Merit Pay Outcomes
Merit Pay: A Strategic Approach to Linking Pay to Performance (Third Edition)
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
