Article navigation
Purpose

This paper aims to explore the types of learning engendered by internal mobility (IM) by referring to the principles elaborated by Bateson (1972).

Design/methodology/approach

A qualitative methodology is followed with interviews among 50 professionals working at four large French firms.

Findings

A system of classification for IM is proposed, namely, replication, adaptation, innovation and revolution.

Practical implications

The identification of these categories invites human resource managers to reconsider the traditional career paths.

Originality/value

This paper brings a new perspective on the possible link between learning and IM and questions what employees really learn thanks to their moves.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options