An increasingly important performance measurement tool, especially in the area of teams, is 360° feedback. This paper discusses the theories behind the system, and provides an in‐depth review of the techniques of implementing 360° feedback in an organization. Steps for implementation include selection of raters, questionnaire construction, feedback, presentation, and follow‐up. Additional considerations such as rater responsibility, cost, organizational change and support, benefits, and dangers of abuse or mis‐usage of the system are addressed. Special considerations are discussed for using the system in team settings and how the system can be built‐in to a developing team system or adapted for use in an existing one. More research is currently needed in areas such as quality of samples, process information, training effectiveness, and sustaining the process.
Article navigation
1 August 1998
Research Article|
August 01 1998
Application of team‐based 360° feedback systems
Simon Hurley
Simon Hurley
Center for the Study of Work Teams, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6860
Print ISSN: 1352-7592
© MCB UP Limited
1998
Team Performance Management: An International Journal (1998) 4 (5): 202–210.
Citation
Hurley S (1998), "Application of team‐based 360° feedback systems". Team Performance Management: An International Journal, Vol. 4 No. 5 pp. 202–210, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527599810234164
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Management Mirror: helping senior management teams see their own reality
Industrial and Commercial Training (December,2001)
360 degree feedback
Journal of European Industrial Training (December,1999)
I was upward appraised… and survived!
Career Development International (April,1996)
Dealing with the dynamics of gender: How men and women cope with criticism
Human Resource Management International Digest (June,2003)
Teams that listen and teams that do not: exploring the role of gender in group responsiveness to negative feeback
Team Performance Management: An International Journal (December,2002)
Related Chapters
Assessment, Instruction, and Learning: What’s the Difference?
What’s Hot in Literacy: Exemplar Models of Effective Practice
Decolonising Formative Assessment
Theory and Method in Higher Education Research
Mitigating Stress Effects on Team Cohesion
Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
