Directive 93/43/EEC introduced the concept of good hygiene practice, in response to a pan‐European increase in the incidence of food poisoning, to foster a preventive approach to food safety. UK legislation reinforces the EU position that food businesses are responsible for the implementation of good hygiene practices. The response of the food industry has been to develop audited standards of hygiene, higher than explicit legal requirements. Small businesses have, however, been slow to adopt industry hygiene standards. A case study of small manufacturers of ready to eat meat products investigated the reasons for this. Businesses were first audited to the EFSIS[1] standard, to compare current practice with recommended best practice. Second, technical managers or owner‐managers were interviewed, to gain an insight into their knowledge of industry standards in particular, and the process of hygiene management in general. The analysis found significant differences in the knowledge of technical managers and owner‐managers, with the latter often unaware of the existence of audited standards. It is argued, therefore, that, in order to increase the implementation of good hygiene practices, further programmes to inform small food businesses about industry standards are required.
Article navigation
1 May 2000
Research Article|
May 01 2000
Information for good hygiene practice in small businesses Available to Purchase
Georgina Holt;
Georgina Holt
Centre for Food Economics Research, The Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Spencer J. Henson
Spencer J. Henson
Centre for Food Economics Research, The Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, The University of Reading, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4108
Print ISSN: 0007-070X
© MCB UP Limited
2000
British Food Journal (2000) 102 (4): 320–337.
Citation
Holt G, Henson SJ (2000), "Information for good hygiene practice in small businesses". British Food Journal, Vol. 102 No. 4 pp. 320–337, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700010327742
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
The good, the bad and the ugly of butchers’ shops’ licensing in England – one local authority’s experience
British Food Journal (February,2002)
Consumers’ concern about meat and meat products quality offered for sale in Mauritius
Nutrition & Food Science (April,2003)
Food safety education initiative to increase consumer use of food thermometers in the United States
British Food Journal (September,2006)
Promoting excellence in food hygiene
Nutrition & Food Science (February,2005)
“Scores on Doors”: hygiene disclosure schemes for consumers
Nutrition & Food Science (February,2008)
Related Chapters
Alcass: Innovation for Sustainable Supply Chains for Traditional and New Products
Organizing Supply Chain Processes for Sustainable Innovation in the Agri-Food Industry
The Impact Technologies of Blockchain and IoT, on Food Security
Transformation for Sustainable Business and Management Practices: Exploring the Spectrum of Industry 5.0
Perceptions of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts Department Students Towards 3D Foods
Future Tourism Trends Volume 2: Technology Advancement, Trends and Innovations for the Future in Tourism
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
