Skip to article sections

Recently, I was asked by one of my students in an online course for tips for managing the volume of posts to read and respond to during the course of a week’s discussion (also known as an online “conference”). My first course of action was to search for online resources that provided such information; however, the majority of sites I found introduced recommendations for instructors or those facilitating discussions rather than strategies for students to make the most of their participation in online discussions. The second step in helping my student was to review the research articles and books I had amassed over the years about online discussions and distance education. Upon reviewing these, though, I encountered the same dilemma: the majority provided strategies for how instructors and facilitators could structure discussions to improve students’ experiences but not ways in which students could better manage the process themselves. Therefore, I decided to develop my own recommendations. Below is a summary of the strategies that I have found to be helpful for students to be successful when participating in online discussions, no matter the setting. I am sure there are others applicable to unique settings and situations, but hope these will serve as a foundation from which to build.

To ensure you address the minimal requirements of participating in online discussions, it is important to become familiar first with what these are! If the requirements are not clear, be sure to ask the instructor for clarification. Your progress (and also very often your grade) depends on the quality and quantity of your participation and, in many cases, also when you participate. If you are not sure about how you are graded or would like an explanation for why you earned a particular grade–ask! It is your right to know and understand the assessment criteria utilized by your instructors.

In a face-to-face discussion, would you be expected to answer every question asked by your instructor during class, or comment on every reply made by a peer? The answer is “no”! Likewise, you do not need to read or engage in every thread of a discussion. Read the subject heading for each post to help you determine if you believe you should read it. Of course, it helps if you and your peers use appropriate subject headings in your posts! One caveat, though, is that your instructor may require you to read every post—so ensure you fully understand the participation requirements.

It is very frustrating to read an entry that essentially says nothing new or is directed at a particular individual. Also, it is maddening to read a list of headings that are all identical. To ensure that your peers and instructor understand what is in your post, provide a clear, concise subject heading that elucidates just this. And, if a particular posting is directed to a particular person, use a heading such as, “To Natalie– I disagree!”

To ensure everyone understands your reply or question, be sure to include the portion of the question or comment and the author that your reply builds on in your response by highlighting it or posting it in a different color to differentiate it from your response.

After you become familiar with the participation requirements for the online discussion, set a schedule to ensure you address the requirements. Many instructors of online courses factor in the quantity and quality of your postings for your grade, as well as when you post your comments. For instance, to earn full points, you may need to post throughout the course of a week as opposed to only the last 3 days of a week’s discussion.

Spelling is not each one of our strengths. No need to fear, though—spell check can help. Simply type your reply to a posting in a word processing program first, then conduct a spell check. Then, copy and paste your comments in the online discussion. Note also that many current versions of discussion boards include a spell check feature, so why not use it?

Have you ever received or, even worse, sent an e-mail that you did not intend to send yet? This can happen with your posts, too. Before you submit a posting, be sure to read it to ensure the response reflects what you really want to communicate about a topic.

It is imperative that you show humanity, respect, and professionalism in your posts, even if you wholeheartedly disagree with someone’s views! Although we might think that no one will post “ugly” remarks, occasionally some people do. And, sometimes it is not even on purpose. So, be careful, polite, and tactful. In an online environment, words can speak louder than actions. And, if a post is upsetting to you, contact the individual in person or via e-mail directly, or contact your instructor to ask that he or she contact the individual personally—but please do not humiliate or antagonize by making a questionable post that everyone can see.

It is important to keep in mind that the point of participating in online discussions is not to agree on everything; rather, it is to share and examine various perspectives about different issues. In fact, some of the best discussions I have participated in were those in which I did not agree at all with some of my peers and students. As such, let us agree to disagree!

Participating in online discussions (and hopefully also an online learning community) involves the sharing and receiving of meaningful information, pertinent to course content. The Web affords us with the opportunity to link to definitions or other resources of interest, so please take advantage of the Web in making a meaningful contribution about the topics examined.

Where applicable, include appropriate references—not only to give credit where credit is due, but also to substantiate your reply. Plus, it shows you have done your homework when you can weave in references from your reading and other sources.

Just because you can write a whole lot of information and link to many, many resources does not mean that doing so will add to the “conversation.” It is important to practice parsimony in your postings by answering question(s) in a concise manner.

If you do not understand a particular post, concept, or acronym offered, ask the author for clarification. Oftentimes, students in online discussions shy away from asking a “dumb” question. Well, there are no dumb questions when it involves learning about a topic. And, chances are, if you do not understand something, there are many others who do not, too!

Sometimes students go off on tangents about topics that are not relevant to the topic being discussed. Be sure to stick to the topic at hand, and if you do have something very, very important to share that is somewhat related, ensure that you make this clear in your subject heading.

Most systems that support online discussions include a feature that allows you to “collect,” download, and/or print a group of postings. For many, this is an easier way to read posts (all in one long “thread”) that saves time from having to click on individual posts. Also, most systems that have this feature allow you to select which items have been read, too. Thus, there is no need to sift between items that have and have not been read previously.

To help you get the most out of a discussion, reflect on your learning by summarizing the major points discussed and learned during the course of a discussion (e.g., during one week). This will help you understand the material better, as well as remember the information covered. You may even wish to enlist some peers in dividing up the work if writing a summary is not a required follow-up assignment to the discussion.

Although most systems that support online discussions are stable, you may encounter a problem accessing it or getting online; therefore, do not wait until the last minute to make posts. And, you may wish to have a backup plan for accessing the Internet to make your posts in case, say, your electricity goes out and your laptop is not charged! between the user and provider. Examples are eBay, Wikipedia, Skype, and Craigslist. So, what does this all mean to the distance educator? Certainly it is nice to have friends, even virtual ones, and social networks seem to have reached the point of “critical mass” and are here to stay, at least until a new innovative use of the Web evolves.

The importance of social networking makes the concept important to distance educators. At the least, a modest understanding of social networking is a must for distance educators. And, it is likely that more depth of understanding will be needed. The taxonomy of social networking for distance learning might look like this:

  • Level 1: Learning about social networks—definitions, history, background, and examples.

  • Level 2: Designing for social networks— profiling, blogging, wiki-ing, and friending.

  • Level 3: Studying social networks—ethics, uses, misuses, policing, and supporting.

  • Level 4: Learning from and with social networks—social networks for teaching and learning, science, research, and theory building.

And finally, maybe we do not need to worry about solitary learners poised in front of a computer. Obviously they want friends, just as the child on the playground does. Virtual friends perhaps, but in many cases true friends. And, for all those social networkers out there, remember the old saying, “we are known by our friends!”

Boyd
,
D.
(
2006
,
December
12
).
Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites
.
First Monday
,
11
(
12
). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html
Boyd
,
D.
, &
Ellison
,
N.
(
2007
).
Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship
.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
,
13
(
1
), article 11.
Sunden
,
J.
(
2003
).
Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment
.
New York
:
Peter Lang
.
Licensed re-use rights only

Data & Figures

USDLA AWARD WINNERS

Nova Southeastern University

Nova Southeastern University

Close modal

New Journal Issue Information

New Journal Issue Information

Close modal

New Book Information

Supplements

References

Boyd
,
D.
(
2006
,
December
12
).
Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites
.
First Monday
,
11
(
12
). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html
Boyd
,
D.
, &
Ellison
,
N.
(
2007
).
Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship
.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
,
13
(
1
), article 11.
Sunden
,
J.
(
2003
).
Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment
.
New York
:
Peter Lang
.

Languages

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal