Individuals sometimes feel compelled to confront a rule‐violator. Because the goal of a confrontation is to stop the objectionable action, the violator may feel that his or her autonomy is being threatened and may resist complying. To reduce the likelihood of negative outcomes, confronters are advised to engage in discourse that makes them appear face‐sensitive. However, we argue that the authority of a speaker and the type of directive (imperative or suggestion) that is spoken interact so as to affect the degree of face‐sensitivity attributed to a confronter. We conducted an experiment to test this notion. Consistent with our position, authorities are perceived as more sensitive when expressing suggestions and are attributed coercive potential regardless of the directive enacted Peers, however, are attributed greater coercive potential when communicating imperatives, while face‐sensitivity is unaffected by the type of directive. Implications for confrontation are discussed.
Article navigation
1 March 1997
Review Article|
March 01 1997
COERCIVE POTENTIAL AND FACE‐SENSITIVITY: THE EFFECTS OF AUTHORITY AND DIRECTIVES IN SOCIAL CONFRONTATION Available to Purchase
Jennifer L. Vollbrecht;
Jennifer L. Vollbrecht
Northwestern University
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael E. Roloff;
Michael E. Roloff
Northwestern University
Search for other works by this author on:
Gaylen D. Paulson
Gaylen D. Paulson
Northwestern University
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-8545
Print ISSN: 1044-4068
© MCB UP Limited
1997
International Journal of Conflict Management (1997) 8 (3): 235–251.
Citation
Vollbrecht JL, Roloff ME, Paulson GD (1997), "COERCIVE POTENTIAL AND FACE‐SENSITIVITY: THE EFFECTS OF AUTHORITY AND DIRECTIVES IN SOCIAL CONFRONTATION". International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 8 No. 3 pp. 235–251, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022797
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
THE INTERPRETATION OF COERCIVE COMMUNICATION: THE EFFECTS OF MODE OF INFLUENCE, POWERFUL SPEECH, AND SPEAKER AUTHORITY
International Journal of Conflict Management (February,1998)
Balancing coercive and non-coercive powers to enhance green supplier integration: do relationship commitment and closeness matter?
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal (June,2020)
Coercive deinternationalisation and host institutional legitimacy
European Business Review (March,2011)
Managerial learning: changing times for medical laboratory managers: a personal experience: Sue Vollbrecht interviewed by Jennifer Bowerman
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv (December,2004)
“Influencers” – a study investigating the messages people receive about coercive control on social media
Journal of Forensic Practice (April,2023)
Related Chapters
Coercive Control and Rough Sex
‘Rough Sex’ and the Criminal Law: Global Perspectives
Coercive and enabling controls in the governance of strategic alliances
Governance Issues in Strategic Alliances
Digital Coercive Control and Spatiality: Rural, Regional, and Remote Women's Experience
The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
