Performance measurement and programme evaluation have been promoted as a central mechanism of recent Australian public sector (APS) reform. Outlines recent reforms in the APS and identifies links between evaluation and performance information. Identifies the major issue of credibility, when performance information is produced internally and not verified externally. A lack of performance systems and standards can create difficulties for both internal and external programme evaluations. Concludes that: reforms introduced to evaluate performance in the APS were promoted with high expectations which have only partially been fulfilled; the present system is internally focused with a narrow role for evaluation and a lack of credibility because of the independence issue; the present systems associated with the performance approach and its evaluation are not providing enough information to deal with the tough questions of the effectiveness of government programmes. Proposes that a middle ground between internal and external programme evaluation strategies be adopted. This allows the strengths of internal evaluation to be retained. At the same time, it allows the possibility of improving programme evaluation by adding external independent verification and an extended effectiveness role.
Article navigation
1 June 1997
Case Report|
June 01 1997
Performance information and programme evaluation in the Australian public sector
James Guthrie;
James Guthrie
Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Linda English
Linda English
Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6666
Print ISSN: 0951-3558
© MCB UP Limited
1997
International Journal of Public Sector Management (1997) 10 (3): 154–164.
Citation
Guthrie J, English L (1997), "Performance information and programme evaluation in the Australian public sector". International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 10 No. 3 pp. 154–164, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559710166039
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Efficiency measurement of Australian public sector organisations: The case of state secondary schools in Victoria
Journal of Educational Administration (June,2002)
Accountability for environmental performance of the Australian Commonwealth public sector
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (October,1997)
Top performing interlending operations: results of the Australian benchmarking study
Interlending & Document Supply (June,2002)
Standards: Locally Led Standards Form Part of a Developing Total Quality Culture
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (June,1992)
Public sector performance measurement: delivering greater accountability
Work Study (February,2003)
Related Chapters
What Characterises the Discussion of Performance Measurements in Public Value Accounting and What Are the Challenges?
Public Value Accounting and Accountability: Current and Future Issues
Knowledge Sharing and Transfer (KST) That Really Works: An Exploration of KST in Sub-Saharan South African Public Sector Institution
Contextualising African Studies: Challenges and the Way Forward
Value distribution in state-owned firms: The case of two companies in Uruguay
Performance Measurement and Management Control: Behavioral Implications and Human Actions
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
